GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Choi, Chang-Min  (3)
  • Lee, Jung Shin  (3)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. e19079-e19079
    Abstract: e19079 Background: The introduction of EGFR inhibitors to standard chemotherapy is an attractive approach to improved outcome. However, the tumor cells which were driven to G0/G1 phase by gefitinib may not sensitive to cytotoxic chemotherapy which is active to G2M arrested tumor cells. This randomized phase II study compared the efficacy of PC intercalated with gefitinib versus PC, as first-line treatment in a clinically selected population of advanced NSCLC patients. Methods: Eligible patients were chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with good ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Non-smoking patients with adenocarcinoma or patients with activating EGFR mutation were excluded because they could benefit from gefitinib alone. They were randomized to either one of the treatments; standard chemotherapy alone (control arm, 46 pts) of paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) and carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1; or the same chemotherapy plus gefitinib 250 mg/day on day 2 through 15 (study arm, 44 pts). The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for maximum 4 cycles without maintenance. The primary endpoint included the response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 90 patients (male 85.6%, median age 59, adenocarcinoma 63.3%, smoker 90.0%, wild-type EGFR 24.4%, unknown EGFR status 75.6%) were included. There was no difference in terms of RR (the study arm, 40.9% [95% CI 27.3-56.8%] vs. the control arm, 37.0% [95% CI 23.8-51.2%] , p=0.701). There was also not difference in terms of PFS (the median PFS; 4.13 vs. 4.13, HR=0.941 [95% CI 0.61-1.45], p=0.781) and OS (the median OS; 9.33 vs. 10.53, HR=0.95 [95% CI 0.58-1.54] , p=0.827). Safety analyses showed a similar incidence of drug-related grade 3/4 toxicity in study group (20.9%) compared with control group (23.3%), while mild rash (58% vs. 9%) and diarrhea (14% vs. 7%) were more common in the study arm. Conclusions: PC chemotherapy intercalated with gefitinib did not improved RR, PFS, and OS compared to PC chemotherapy alone in clinically selected population of advanced NSCLC patients who were smoker or wild-type EGFR. Clinical trial information: NCT01196234.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e18052-e18052
    Abstract: e18052 Background: Efatutazone is a novel, third-generation thiazolidinedione (TZD) showing higher potency over second generation TZDs, such as pioglitazone. In non-Asian patients with advanced solid tumors, the recommended dose is 0.50 mg twice-daily (BID) in accordance with PK, PD and safety analyses in a US phase 1 study. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, PK, antitumor activity, PD, and determined the recommended dose of efatutazone in combination with erlotinib in Korean patients. Methods: This was an open-label, dose-escalation study using a 3+3 design in combination with erlotinib. Each patient participated in only 1 dose group and received oral efatutazone 0.25 or 0.50 mg BID with administration of erlotinib 150 mg QD. After determining the recommended dose of efatutazone, 9 additional patients were enrolled to the recommended dose for further assessment. PK samples were collected at day 1 and 22. PD samples were collected weekly until day 36. All subjects provided written informed consent. Results: A total of 14 patients were enrolled (10 male and 4 female; age range: 39–73 years; 12 Adenocarcinoma and 2 Squamous cell carcinoma; EGFR mutation: 5 positive, 4 negative and 5 not conducted) and received treatment at doses of 0.25 and 0.50 mg BID (n= 3 in 0.25mg, n= 11 in 0.50mg cohort). DLT were not observed, and the MTD was not reached. Efatutazone was well tolerated. The majority of patients experienced edema (78.6%, 11 out of 14 patients) and weight increase (64.3%, 9 out of 14 patients), often requiring diuretics. Five out of 14 patients showed PR (3 confirmed in 0.50mg cohort) and 4 patients showed SD. Efatutazone increased plasma adiponectin levels in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions: Efatutazone is a novel anticancer therapy and in combination with erlotinib was tolerated and demonstrated early evidence of antitumor activity. Although the MTD for efatutazone was not reached, 0.50 mg BID, corresponding to the global recommended dose, was selected as the recommended dose for Korean patients. Full safety data and clinical activity data will be presented.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 17, No. 15 ( 2011-08-01), p. 5093-5100
    Abstract: Purpose: To investigate whether 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may be a potential tool to select a subgroup of patients who might be spared maintenance treatment, if the metabolic response after first-line chemotherapy could predict time-to-progression (TTP). Experimental Design: A total of 43 patients who underwent baseline FDG-PET scan and did not show disease progression (DP) after 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and underwent second FDG-PET 3 weeks after completion of the first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was to compare percent decrease in maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) between early (TTP after second PET examination & lt;8 weeks) and late (TTP ≥8 weeks) DP subgroups. Secondary endpoints were to determine whether fractional decrease in SUVmax could predict TTP and overall survival (OS), both calculated from the date of the second FDG-PET. Results: Percent decreases in SUVmax in late DP subgroup were greater than those in early DP subgroup (mean reduction, 54.7% ± 27.2% vs. 27.8% ± 46.8%, P = 0.021). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a 50.0% decrease in SUVmax as the optimal threshold to distinguish these subgroups. Using this value as the cutoff resulted in a positive predictive value of 82.6% and negative predictive value of 60.0% in predicting TTP ≥8 weeks. Patients with SUVmax decrease & lt;50% had significantly longer median TTP (3.0 vs. 1.5 months, P = 0.001) and OS (not reached vs. 14.2 months, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Fractional decrease in SUVmax of the main lesion after completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy may discriminate patients with TTP ≥8 weeks and predict TTP and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res; 17(15); 5093–100. ©2011 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...