GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Cheng, Sunfa  (3)
  • Tatsuoka, Yoshihisa  (3)
Material
Publisher
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Wiley, Vol. 59, No. 10 ( 2019-11), p. 1731-1742
    Abstract: A phase 2, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab for the prevention of episodic migraine in Japanese patients was conducted. Background Previous global clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of erenumab in the prevention of migraine. Methods Patients were randomized to placebo or erenumab 28, 70, or 140 mg administered subcutaneously once per month for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in mean monthly migraine days over months 4‐6 of the double‐blind treatment phase. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction from baseline in mean monthly migraine days (≥50% response) and change from baseline in mean monthly acute migraine‐specific medication treatment days (MSMD) and mean Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6™) scores. Efficacy outcomes were also determined at months 1, 2, and 3. Results Four hundred and seventy five patients were randomized 2:1:2:2 to placebo and erenumab 28, 70, and 140 mg, respectively. Greater reductions in monthly migraine days were observed for erenumab vs placebo with differences of –1.25 (95% CI: –2.10 to –0.41; P  = .004), –2.31 (95% CI: –3.00 to –1.62; P   〈  .001), and –1.89 (95% CI: –2.58 to –1.20; P   〈  .001) days for erenumab 28, 70, and 140 mg. The odds of having a ≥50% response were 3.2, 5.6, and 4.7 times greater for erenumab 28 mg (95% CI: 1.30‐7.88; P  = .009), 70 mg (95% CI: 2.60‐12.06; P   〈  .001), and 140 mg (95% CI: 2.24‐9.99; P   〈  .001) than for placebo. Greater reductions from baseline in mean acute monthly MSMD were observed for erenumab vs placebo with differences of –1.07 (95% CI: –1.80 to –0.35; P  = .004), –2.07 (95% CI: –2.66 to –1.49; P   〈  .001), and –2.04 (95% CI: –2.63 to –1.45; P   〈  .001) days for erenumab 28, 70, and 140 mg. Erenumab 70 and 140 mg also resulted in greater improvements in HIT‐6™ scores. The safety profile was similar across treatment groups. The most common adverse event was nasopharyngitis, which occurred in 29.4% of patients in the placebo group and 28.9%‐33.3% of patients in the erenumab groups. Conclusion Monthly subcutaneous injections of erenumab 70 mg demonstrated statistically significant and numerically maximal efficacy with a favorable safety profile, suggesting that erenumab is a potential new therapy for migraine prevention in Japan.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0017-8748 , 1526-4610
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020316-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Brain and Behavior, Wiley, Vol. 12, No. 3 ( 2022-03)
    Abstract: In two 24‐week migraine prevention studies in Japan, erenumab was associated with significantly greater reductions in migraine frequency versus placebo over Weeks 13–24 (primary endpoint). This post hoc analysis evaluated the onset of efficacy within the first 4 weeks after the initiation of erenumab from the 24‐week double‐blind periods of these studies. Methods Placebo‐adjusted differences in least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline in weekly migraine days (WMD) were assessed weekly in each study and by migraine type (episodic (EM]/chronic [CM] ) (Study 20170609). Results A total of 407 patients from Study 20120309 (70 mg: N = 135; 140 mg: N = 136; placebo: N = 136) and 261 patients from Study 20170609 ([EM] 70 mg: N = 78; placebo: N = 81; [CM] 70 mg: N = 52; placebo: N = 50) were included. For Study 20120309, onset of efficacy was observed as early as Week 1 in favor of erenumab versus placebo. Placebo‐adjusted differences in LSM (95% confidence interval [CI]) change from baseline in WMD at Week 1 were −0.38 (−0.71 to −0.05; p  = .022) and −0.49 (−0.82 to −0.16; p  = .004) in favor of erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively. For Study 20170609, significant placebo‐adjusted differences were observed with erenumab 70 mg at Week 1 in patients with EM (LSM [95% CI]: −0.55 [−0.97 to −0.12; p  = .012]), and at Week 2 in patients with CM (LSM [95% CI] : −0.81 [−1.53 to −0.09; p  = .028]) and for the overall population (LSM [95% CI] : −0.71 [−1.09 to −0.33; p   〈  .001]). Conclusions Erenumab treatment significantly reduced WMD compared with placebo. Onset of erenumab efficacy occurred as early as Week 1 in patients with migraine.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2162-3279 , 2162-3279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2623587-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, Wiley, Vol. 61, No. 4 ( 2021-04), p. 653-661
    Abstract: To assess long‐term (up to 2 years) efficacy, tolerability, and safety of erenumab for the prevention of episodic migraine (EM) in Japanese patients. Background Previously published results from the double‐blind treatment phase (DBTP) of a phase 2 clinical study have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese patients with EM. Methods Patients completing the 24‐week placebo‐controlled DBTP could continue into the 76‐week open‐label treatment phase (OLTP), receiving erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg subcutaneously once monthly. The initial dose in the OLTP was erenumab 70 mg monthly, which was later changed to 140 mg. After study completion, the following were assessed: change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD), change from baseline in monthly acute migraine‐specific medication days (MSMD), percentage of patients achieving ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in MMD, change from baseline in the 6‐item Headache Impact Test (HIT‐6™) score, and safety (exposure‐adjusted patient‐incidence of adverse events [AEs] , calculated as number of patients per 100 patient‐years). Results Of 475 patients enrolled in the DBTP, 459 (96.6%) continued in the OLTP. The mean (SD) MMD was 7.9 (2.3) at baseline with the overall change from baseline at week 100 of –2.9 (4.1) days. The monthly acute MSMD was 5.7 (2.8) at baseline with change from baseline at week 100 of −1.7 (3.7) days. The proportion of patients who achieved ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in MMD from baseline at week 100 was 177/398 (44.5%) and 94/398 (23.6%), respectively. The HIT‐6™ score was 58.4 (5.4) at baseline with a change of −6.4 (8.2) at week 100. The exposure‐adjusted patient‐incidence of AEs during the OLTP was 207.1/100 patient‐years for the combined erenumab group, similar to that observed for either erenumab (271.0/100 patient‐years) or placebo (257.3/100 patient‐years) during the DBTP, and no new safety signals were detected during the OLTP. Conclusion Long‐term erenumab treatment in Japanese patients with EM demonstrated sustained efficacy for up to 2 years, with a safety profile similar to previous studies, supporting erenumab as a potential new therapy for EM prevention in Japan.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0017-8748 , 1526-4610
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020316-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...