GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Chen, Yu  (2)
  • 2020-2024  (2)
  • 2020  (2)
  • Medicine  (2)
Material
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (2)
Year
  • 2020  (2)
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (2)
RVK
  • 1
    In: Arthritis & Rheumatology, Wiley, Vol. 72, No. 12 ( 2020-12), p. 1998-2004
    Abstract: Coagulopathy is one of the characteristics observed in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) contribute to coagulopathy, though their role in COVID‐19 remains unclear. This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and characteristics of aPLs in patients with COVID‐19. Methods Sera collected from 66 COVID‐19 patients who were critically ill and 13 COVID‐19 patients who were not critically ill were tested by chemiluminescence immunoassay for anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs), anti–β 2 ‐glycoprotein I (anti‐β 2 GPI) (IgG, IgM, and IgA), and IgG anti‐β 2 GPI–domain 1 (anti‐β 2 GPI–D1) and IgM and IgG anti–phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti‐PS/PT) antibodies were detected in the serum by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results Of the 66 COVID‐19 patients in critical condition, aPLs were detected in 31 (47% ). Antiphospholipid antibodies were not present among COVID‐19 patients who were not in critical condition. The IgA anti‐β 2 GPI antibody was the most commonly observed aPL in patients with COVID‐19 and was present in 28.8% (19 of 66) of the critically ill patients, followed by IgA aCLs (17 of 66, or 25.8%) and IgG anti‐β 2 GPI (12 of 66, or 18.2%). For multiple aPLs, IgA anti‐β 2 GPI + IgA aCLs was the most common antibody profile observed (15 of 66, or 22.7%), followed by IgA anti‐β 2 GPI + IgA aCL + IgG anti‐β 2 GPI (10 of 66, or 15.2%). Antiphospholipid antibodies emerge ~35–39 days after disease onset. A dynamic analysis of aPLs revealed 4 patterns based on the persistence or transient appearance of the aPLs. Patients with multiple aPLs had a significantly higher incidence of cerebral infarction compared to patients who were negative for aPLs ( P = 0.023). Conclusion Antiphospholipid antibodies were common in critically ill patients with COVID‐19. Repeated testing demonstrating medium to high titers of aPLs and the number of aPL types a patient is positive for may help in identifying patients who are at risk of developing cerebral infarction. Antiphospholipid antibodies may be transient and disappear within a few weeks, but in genetically predisposed patients, COVID‐19 may trigger the development of an autoimmune condition similar to the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), referred to as “COVID‐19–induced APS‐like syndrome.” Long‐term follow‐up of COVID‐19 patients who are positive for aPLs would be of great importance in understanding the pathogenesis of this novel coronavirus.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2326-5191 , 2326-5205
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2754614-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Massachusetts Medical Society ; 2020
    In:  New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 382, No. 17 ( 2020-04-23), p. e38-
    In: New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, Vol. 382, No. 17 ( 2020-04-23), p. e38-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-4793 , 1533-4406
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468837-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...