In:
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 33, No. 1 ( 2022-01), p. 81-86
Abstract:
No randomized controlled trial has compared the treatment outcome between surgical mandibular advancement and premolar extractions in class II malocclusion. This 2-arm parallel randomized controlled trial evaluated the treatment effects and lip profile changes in skeletal class II adult patients subjected to bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement and those treated with premolar extractions. Seventy skeletal class II patients were accessed and forty-six subjects who fulfilled inclusion criteria were distributed randomly into Group CG (patients: 23, mean age: 21.28 ± 2.69 years) and Group SG (patients: 23, mean age: 21.15 ± 2.64 years). Group CG was subjected to extraction of maxillary first premolars and mandibular second premolars followed by implant supported space closure and Group SG was managed by surgical mandibular advancement. Skeletal, dental, and soft-tissue changes were analyzed. The study was single-blinded (statistical analyzer). Groups were closely matched for baseline parameters. In the present trial there was no loss to follow-up. Though overjet and overbite were optimized in both the groups but significant improvement was seen in surgical cases. Group CG demonstrated statistically significant point “A” remodeling, dentoalveolar changes, and increase in nasolabial angle. Group SG exhibited significant sagittal and vertical skeletal improvement and lip position change. Surgical mandibular advancement was found to be a better treatment modality compared to premolars extraction for managing skeletal class II div 1 malocclusion as it permits greater improvement of the profile and skeletal relationship.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1049-2275
,
1536-3732
DOI:
10.1097/SCS.0000000000007986
Language:
English
Publisher:
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2060546-8
Permalink
