GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (4)
  • Zhang, Li  (4)
  • Medicine  (4)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (4)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (4)
RVK
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 29 ( 2021-10-10), p. 3273-3282
    Abstract: GEM20110714 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01528618 ), the first randomized, phase III study of systemic chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), reported significant progression-free survival improvement with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.68; P 〈 .001). Data from the final analysis of overall survival (OS) are presented here. METHODS From February 2012 to October 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to receive either GP (gemcitabine 1 g/m 2 once daily on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) or FP (fluorouracil 4 g/m 2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) once every 21 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which has been previously reported; OS was a secondary end point. RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 69.5 months with GP and 69.7 months with FP, 148 (81.8%) and 166 (91.7%) deaths occurred in the GP and FP arms, respectively. The estimated hazard ratio for OS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; two-sided P = .004). The median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 25.0 months) with GP versus 18.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 to 21.7 months) with FP. The OS probabilities at 1, 3, and 5 years were 79.9% versus 71.8%, 31.0% versus 20.4%, and 19.2% versus 7.8%, respectively. Poststudy therapy was administered in 51.9% and 55.2% of patients in the GP and FP arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Among patients with previously untreated advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, those who receive GP have longer OS than those receive FP. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin should be considered a preferred front-line option for these patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 9095-9095
    Abstract: 9095 Background: IBI305 is a recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, a biosimilar candidate to bevacizumab in analytical and functional comparisons. Pharmacokinetic similarity has been demonstrated in healthy males. Here we present primary efficacy and safety results from a phase 3 comparative study in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this double-blind, active-controlled study, subjects with advanced non-squamous NSCLC on first-line treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel were randomized (1:1) to IBI305 or bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV Q3W). After six cycles, patients were on maintenance treatment with IBI305 or bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg IV Q3W) till progression. Clinical equivalence of the primary endpoint, confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated by comparing the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of the risk ratio (RR) between study arms with the prespecified margin (0.75, 1.33). Results: A total of 450 subjects were randomized (IBI305: n = 224; bevacizumab: n = 226). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. ORR evaluated by Independent Radiological Review Committee (IRRC) in full analysis set (FAS) was 44.3% (98/221) for IBI305 and 46.4% (102/220) for bevacizumab; the RR for ORR was 0.95 (90% CI: 0.803, 1.135). Sensitive analysis result on RRs of ORR in Intention to Treat (ITT) population (IBI305: n = 224; bevacizumab: n = 226) and other analysis set were consistent and all within the prespecified equivalence margin. The medium PFS were 8.4 months for IBI305 and 8.3 months for bevacizumab and duration of response (DOR) was also similar in both arms. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were well balanced between treatment arms and consistent with the known adverse event profile of bevacizumab. Patients developing binding antibodies were 0.5% in the IBI305 arm vs 0% in the bevacizumab arm; no subject tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This is the first released phase 3 clinical study with maintenance treatment for bevacizumab biosimilar in NSCLC patients till now. The comparative study met its predefined primary endpoint that the RR for confirmed ORR was within the prespecified equivalence margin. There was no significant difference between the two arms in safety profile and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02954172.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3020-3020
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3020-3020
    Abstract: 3020 Background: KN046 is a bispecific antibody that blocks PD-L1 and CTLA-4 by interaction with PD1 and CD80/CD86. KN046-CHN-001 (NCT03529526) is a, dose escalation and expansion phase Ia/Ib clinical trial in China. Here we reported safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy in patients failed on prior immune checkpoint inhibiters (ICIs) treatment. Methods: Patients progressed on ICIs (including but not limited to antibodies targeting PD-1, PD-L1, OX40, et al) with pathologically confirmed solid tumor, ECOG 0-1, measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1, no immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) led to ICIs discontinuation, were enrolled and received intravenous KN046 treatment across four dose levels including 3.0 mg/kg (n = 3) and 5.0 mg/kg (n = 20) Q2W; and 5.0 mg/kg (n = 4), 300.0 mg flat dose (n = 2) Q3W. Safety and tolerability were assessed per NCI-CTCAE v5.0. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and IRAEs were decided by investigators. Efficacy was evaluated by investigators per RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. Results: Twenty-nine who progressed on prior ICIs therapy were enrolled (25anti-PD-1 antibody; 3 anti-OX40 antibody; and 1 anti-CD137 antibody) and were included in the current analysis. Among 29 patients, 19 were nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and 9 were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The median duration of the exposure of KN046 was 12 weeks (range 2 to 40). Eleven patients remained on the treatment and 18 discontinued due to disease progression (n = 13), AE (n = 1), death (n = 1) and others (n = 3). Twenty-six (89.7%) patients experienced TRAEs of all grades and 2 (6.9%) experienced grade≥3 TRAEs (1 grade 3 anemia and 1 grade 3 infusion-related reaction). The most common (≥10%) TRAEs were pruritus (8, 27.6%), rash (8, 27.6%), asthenia (6, 20.7%), fatigue (6, 20.7%), pyrexia (5, 17.2%), infusion related reaction (4, 13.8%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (3, 10.3%) and white blood cell count elevation (3, 10.3%). Eleven (37.9%) patients experienced irAEs (with no grade≥3). Objective responses were occurred in 3 (12.0%, 25 evaluable) patients, disease control rate was 52.0% (10 stable disease). Median progression free survival was 2.69 (95%CI 1.31,5.52) months. Median overall survival was not reached. PFS rates for 3 and 6 Months were 41.0% (95%CI 18.5, 62.5) and 21.9% (95%CI 4.6, 47.3). OS rates for 6 and 9 months were88% (95%CI 57.2, 97.1) and 58.7% (95%CI 8.3, 89.2), respectively. Conclusions: Overall, KN046 showed a favorable safety profile and promising clinical benefit in advanced solid tumor patients who failed on prior ICIs therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03529526 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 6521-6521
    Abstract: 6521 Background: GEM20110714, the first randomized, phase III study (NCT01528618) of systemic chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), reported significant reduction of disease progression with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0·44–0·68; P 〈 .001). This study establishes GP as the standard-of-care for first-line treatment of R/M NPC. We present the final overall survival (OS) analysis here. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label study conducted in China, patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and R/M NPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive up to six cycles of either GP or FP once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was PFS, which has been previously reported; OS was a secondary endpoint. The final OS analysis was conducted with the data cutoff date of December 17, 2019. Results: After a median follow-up time of 64.4 months (95% CI, 61.1-67.6), 148 (81.8%) and 165 (91.2%) deaths occurred in the GP and FP arms, respectively. The estimated hazard ratio for OS was 0.723 (95% CI, 0.578 to 0.904; two-sided P = .004). The median OS was 22.1 months with GP versus 18.6 months with FP. The OS probabilities at 1, 3, and 5 years were 79.9% vs. 71.8%, 31.0% vs. 20.4%, and 18.5% vs. 7.6%, respectively. Un-predefined subgroup analyses based on baseline characteristics were consistent with the primary OS analysis. Postdiscontinuation systemic therapy use was similar: GP, 52%; FP, 57%. No new safety signals emerged. Conclusions: In patients with R/M NPC, GP is the first regimen to show significant improvement in OS in a phase III randomized study compared with a traditional chemotherapy regimen (i.e. FP). GP should be considered the standard treatment option for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01528618 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...