GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Campone, M  (2)
  • 2010-2014  (2)
  • Medicine  (2)
Material
Language
Years
  • 2010-2014  (2)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (2)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2011
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P4-07-18-P4-07-18
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 71, No. 24_Supplement ( 2011-12-15), p. P4-07-18-P4-07-18
    Abstract: Purpose: Circulating tumors cells (CTC) have been recently proposed as a new dynamic blood marker whose positivity at baseline is a prognostic factor and whose changes under treatment are correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, serum markers levels are also used for the same purpose, and no clear comparison as been reported to date. Patients and methods: The IC 2006–04 enrolled prospectively 267 metastatic breast cancer patients treated by first line chemotherapy and confirmed that CTC levels are an independent prognostic factor for PFS and Overall survival (OS). A pre-planned endpoint was to compare prospectively the positivity rates and the value of CTC (CellSearch®), of serum tumor markers (CEA, CA 15–3, CYFRA 21.1), and of serum non-tumor markers (LDH, ALP) at baseline and under treatment for PFS prediction, independently from the other known prognostic factors, using univariate analyses and concordance indexes. Results: Table 1 shows the incidence of each of the 6 blood markers. Assessing all the 6 markers retrieved 90% of patients with at least one elevated marker at baseline. Interestingly, a combination of two markers (CA 15–3 and CYFRA 21.1, often used in lung cancer) retrieved 86% of patients with at least one marker elevated at baseline. All 6 markers were correlated with poor performance status, high number of metastatic sites and with each other. Each marker was associated, when elevated at baseline, with a significantly shorter PFS in univariate anlaysis. Serum marker changes during treatment, assessed either between baseline and week 3 or between baseline and week 6–9, were significantly associated with PFS, as reported for CTC. Concordance indexes comparison showed no clear superiority of any of the serum marker or CTC for PFS prediction. Conclusion: In the largest prospective CTC study in metastatic breast breast cancer, we previously reported that CTC count, but not serum markers, is an independent prognostic factor for PFS and overall survival. However, for the purpose of PFS prediction by measuring blood marker changes during treatment, currently available blood-derived markers (CTC and serum markers) had globally similar performances. Besides CEA and CA 15–3, CYFRA 21.1 is commonly elevated in metastatic breast cancer and has a strong prognostic value. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-18.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 70, No. 24_Supplement ( 2010-12-15), p. PD04-07-PD04-07
    Abstract: Introduction: CTC detection in peripheral blood is an independent prognostic factor in early breast cancer but with a low detection rate of 10% to 23% of the patients (B. Rack, ASCO 2010, FC Bidard, Ann Oncol 2010). Changes in the HER2 status of CTC compared to the primary tumor have been reported (Riethdorf S CCR 2010). Predictive value of CEC for response to anti-angiogenic agents is debated. Material and methods: CTC and CEC were detected in 7.5 ml and 4 ml of blood respectively in IBC (T4d) patients enrolled in the phase II multicenter trial, BEVERLY 2. This study is evaluating the efficacy of bevacizumab (15mg/kg q3w given concurrently) in combination with sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy of 4 cycles of FEC followed by 4 cycles of Docetaxel-Trastuzumab. Bevacizumab was stopped 4 weeks before and reintroduced 4 weeks (w) after mastectomy. All patients had non metastatic IBC and over expressed HER2 (3+ in IHC or FISH +). The CellSearch™ System, combining EpCAM immunomagnetic selection (IMS) followed by anti-cytokeratin (A45B/B3) and anti-HER2 fluorescently staining for CTC and CD146 IMS and CD105 staining for CEC, was used at baseline, before cycle 5, before and after surgery. Results: From Oct 2008 to Oct 2009, 52 patients were included in this study and 51 were evaluable for CTC. At baseline, 18 patients out of 51 had ≥ one detectable CTC (35.3%, 95%CI 22-48%, range 1 to 92). Pathological complete response rate according to local review was 33/47 (70%) or 15/22 (68%) for centrally reviewed cases. At baseline, CTC level was not correlated with CEC level, neither with other patients and tumor characteristics’ (age, nodal status, PeV) nor pCR (centrally reviewed in 24). All positive cases for CTC detection had HER2 positive CTC. Five pts out of 18 (28%) had both HER2+ and HER2 negative CTCs in their blood. A lower level of CEC ( & lt; 20/4ml) before C5 could be associated with a higher probability of pCR (Khi2 test, p=0.053). Conclusion: We observed a high CTC detection rate of 35% in this population of patients with HER2+ IBC and a dramatic drop in CTC level during treatment in concordance with the high efficiency of this combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy. We observed heterogeneity in the HER2 status of CTC in some patients. CEC levels increased progressively during neoadjuvant treatment and decreased after its interruption. Longer follow-up will show if CTC and CEC variations are early predictive factors for this highly efficient combination in HER2+ IBC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD04-07.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...