GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 49, No. 3 ( 2022-02), p. 992-1001
    Abstract: To compare CT, MRI, and [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([ 18 F]-FDG PET/MRI) for nodal status, regarding quantity and location of metastatic locoregional lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Materials and methods One hundred eighty-two patients (mean age 52.7 ± 11.9 years) were included in this prospective double-center study. Patients underwent dedicated contrast-enhanced chest/abdomen/pelvis computed tomography (CT) and whole-body ([ 18 F]-FDG PET/) magnet resonance imaging (MRI). Thoracal datasets were evaluated separately regarding quantity, lymph node station (axillary levels I–III, supraclavicular, internal mammary chain), and lesion character (benign vs. malign). Histopathology served as reference standard for patient-based analysis. Patient-based and lesion-based analyses were compared by a McNemar test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were assessed for all three imaging modalities. Results On a patient-based analysis, PET/MRI correctly detected significantly more nodal positive patients than MRI ( p   〈  0.0001) and CT ( p   〈  0.0001). No statistically significant difference was seen between CT and MRI. PET/MRI detected 193 lesions in 75 patients (41.2%), while MRI detected 123 lesions in 56 patients (30.8%) and CT detected 104 lesions in 50 patients, respectively. Differences were statistically significant on a lesion-based analysis (PET/MRI vs. MRI, p   〈  0.0001; PET/MRI vs. CT, p   〈  0.0001; MRI vs. CT, p  = 0.015). Subgroup analysis for different lymph node stations showed that PET/MRI detected significantly more lymph node metastases than MRI and CT in each location (axillary levels I–III, supraclavicular, mammary internal chain). MRI was superior to CT only in axillary level I ( p  = 0.0291). Conclusion [ 18 F]-FDG PET/MRI outperforms CT or MRI in detecting nodal involvement on a patient-based analysis and on a lesion-based analysis. Furthermore, PET/MRI was superior to CT or MRI in detecting lymph node metastases in all lymph node stations. Of all the tested imaging modalities, PET/MRI showed the highest sensitivity, whereas CT showed the lowest sensitivity, but was most specific.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1619-7070 , 1619-7089
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2098375-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Nuclear Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 46, No. 3 ( 2021-3), p. 201-205
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to correlate prognostically relevant immunohistochemical parameters of breast cancer with simultaneously acquired SUVs and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived from hybrid breast PET/MRI. Patients and Methods Fifty-six women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive, histologically proven breast cancer (mean age, 54.1 ± 12.0 years) underwent dedicated prone 18 F-FDG breast PET/MRI. Diffusion-weighted imaging ( b -values: 0, 500, 1000 s/mm 2 ) was performed simultaneously with the PET acquisition. A region of interest encompassing the entire primary tumor on each patient’s PET/MRI scan was used to determine the glucose metabolism represented by maximum and mean SUV as well as into corresponding ADC maps to assess tumor cellularity represented by mean and minimum ADC values. Histopathological tumor grading and prognostically relevant immunohistochemical markers, that is, Ki67, progesterone receptor, estrogen receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), were assessed. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUV and ADC values as well as the immunohistochemically markers and molecular subtype. For the comparison with the tumor grading, a Wilcoxon test was used. Results A significant inverse correlation between SUV and ADC values derived from breast PET/MRI ( r = −0.49 for SUV mean vs ADC mean ; r = −0.43 for SUV max vs ADC min ; both P ’s 〈 0.001) was found. Tumor grading and Ki67 both showed a positive correlation with SUV mean from breast PET/MRI ( r = 0.37 and r = 0.32, P 〈 0.01). For immunohistochemical markers, HER2 showed an inverse correlation with ADC values from breast PET/MRI ( r = −0.35, P 〈 0.01). Molecular subtypes significantly correlate with SUV max and SUV mean ( r = 0.52 and r = 0.42, both P ’s 〈 0.05). In addition, estrogen receptor expression showed an inverse correlation with SUV max and SUV mean from breast PET/MRI ( r = −0.45 and r = −0.42, P 〈 0.001). Conclusions The present data show a correlation between increased glucose metabolism, cellularity, tumor grading, estrogen and HER2 expression, as well as molecular subtype of breast cancer primaries. Hence, simultaneous 18 F-FDG PET and diffusion-weighted imaging from hybrid breast PET/MRI may serve as a predictive tool for identifying high-risk breast cancer patients in initial staging and guide-targeted therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1536-0229 , 0363-9762
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2045053-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 47, No. 12 ( 2020-11), p. 2816-2825
    Abstract: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of whole-body MRI and whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/MRI for N and M staging in newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer. Material and methods A total of 104 patients (age 53.4 ± 12.5) with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer were enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/MRI. MRI and 18 F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were evaluated separately regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion characterization (malignant/benign) as well as the diagnostic confidence (5-point ordinal scale, 1–5). The N and M stages were assessed according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual in MRI datasets alone and in 18 F-FDG PET/MRI datasets, respectively. In the majority of lesions histopathology served as the reference standard. The remaining lesions were followed-up by imaging and clinical examination. Separately for nodal-positive and nodal-negative women, a McNemar chi 2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity of the N and M stages between 18 F-FDG PET/MRI and MRI. Differences in diagnostic confidence scores were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results MRI determined the N stage correctly in 78 of 104 (75%) patients with a sensitivity of 62.3% (95% CI: 0.48–0.75), a specificity of 88.2% (95% CI: 0.76–0.96), a PPV (positive predictive value) of 84.6% % (95% CI: 69.5–0.94), and a NPV (negative predictive value) of 69.2% (95% CI: 0.57–0.8). Corresponding results for 18 F-FDG PET/MRI were 87/104 (83.7%), 75.5% (95% CI: 0.62–0.86), 92.2% (0.81–0.98), 90% (0.78–0.97), and 78.3% (0.66–0.88), showing a significantly better sensitivity of 18 F-FDG PET/MRI determining malignant lymph nodes ( p  = 0.008). The M stage was identified correctly in MRI and 18 F-FDG PET/MRI in 100 of 104 patients (96.2%). Both modalities correctly staged all 7 patients with distant metastases, leading to false-positive findings in 4 patients in each modality (3.8%). In a lesion-based analysis, 18 F-FDG PET/MRI showed a significantly better performance in correctly determining malignant lesions (85.8% vs. 67.1%, difference 18.7% (95% CI: 0.13–0.26), p   〈  0.0001) and offered a superior diagnostic confidence compared with MRI alone (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 3.4 ± 0.7, p   〈  0.0001). Conclusion 18 F-FDG PET/MRI has a better diagnostic accuracy for N staging in primary breast cancer patients and provides a significantly higher diagnostic confidence in lesion characterization than MRI alone. But both modalities bear the risk to overestimate the M stage.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1619-7070 , 1619-7089
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2098375-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...