GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Brigard, Felipe De  (1)
  • Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures  (1)
Material
Publisher
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
FID
Subjects(RVK)
  • Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures  (1)
  • Psychology  (1)
RVK
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2017
    In:  Cognitive Science Vol. 41, No. S5 ( 2017-05), p. 1216-1228
    In: Cognitive Science, Wiley, Vol. 41, No. S5 ( 2017-05), p. 1216-1228
    Abstract: Counterfactual thinking involves imagining hypothetical alternatives to reality. Philosopher David Lewis (1973, 1979) argued that people estimate the subjective plausibility that a counterfactual event might have occurred by comparing an imagined possible world in which the counterfactual statement is true against the current, actual world in which the counterfactual statement is false. Accordingly, counterfactuals considered to be true in possible worlds comparatively more similar to ours are judged as more plausible than counterfactuals deemed true in possible worlds comparatively less similar. Although Lewis did not originally develop his notion of comparative similarity to be investigated as a psychological construct, this study builds upon his idea to empirically investigate comparative similarity as a possible psychological strategy for evaluating the perceived plausibility of counterfactual events. More specifically, we evaluate judgments of comparative similarity between episodic memories and episodic counterfactual events as a factor influencing people's judgments of plausibility in counterfactual simulations, and we also compare it against other factors thought to influence judgments of counterfactual plausibility, such as ease of simulation and prior simulation. Our results suggest that the greater the perceived similarity between the original memory and the episodic counterfactual event, the greater the perceived plausibility that the counterfactual event might have occurred. While similarity between actual and counterfactual events, ease of imagining, and prior simulation of the counterfactual event were all significantly related to counterfactual plausibility, comparative similarity best captured the variance in ratings of counterfactual plausibility. Implications for existing theories on the determinants of counterfactual plausibility are discussed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0364-0213 , 1551-6709
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 282371-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002940-8
    SSG: 25
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...