In:
Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 993-993
Abstract:
Context. The prognostic value of gene mutations in older AML patients (pts) treated intensively remains unclear. Only one study has explored the role of mutation patterns determined by NGS in older AML pts prospectively treated with various chemotherapies in years 2000-2010 (Eisfeld Leukemia 2018). Methods. Pts older than 60y enrolled in the ALFA-1200 trial (NCT01966497) between 09/2012 and 06/2016 were sequenced with a 37-gene myeloid panel. Pts received one 7+3 course followed by 2 intermediate-dose cytarabine courses. Pts with non-favorable risk were eligible for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Variable selection for multivariate analyses was performed by lasso penalized regression including age, gender and log(WBC) as covariates. Results. Sequencing was done in 471 (93%) of the 509 enrolled pts. Median age and WBC count were 68y and 5.3x109/L, respectively (resp). CR (including CRp) was achieved in 341 (72%) pts and 90 underwent RIC-SCT in first CR. With a median follow-up of 25.4 months, median OS was 20.7 months. Pts had a median of 3 mutations (range 1-10). The 17 mostly frequently mutated genes (≥5% of pts, by decreasing frequency: DNMT3A, NPM1, TET2, ASXL1, FLT3, SRSF2, IDH2, RUNX1, NRAS, IDH1, STAG2, BCOR, TP53, PTPN11, U2AF1, EZH2 and KRAS) were retained for prognostic analyses. Genes belonging to a common pathway (eg. NRAS and KRAS) may have divergent prognostic values, preventing biology-informed grouping of mutations. Cytogenetic risk (derived from ELN 2017, Döhner Blood 2017, not considering gene mutations) was favorable (fav), intermediate (int), adverse (adv) and missing in 3%, 72%, 18% and 7% resp. Because of the few pts with fav cytogenetics in our cohort, pts were further grouped into non-adv and adv cytogenetics. CR rates and median OS were 75.6% vs 56.6% and 24.8 vs 9.5 months in pts with non-adv and adv cytogenetics, resp (both p 〈 0.0001). Because of difference in mutational patterns and gene-gene interactions, the prognostic role of mutations was considered independently in these two non-adv and adv subgroups. In the 388 pts with non-adv cytogenetics, NPM1 mutations independently predicted improved CR rate (Odds Ratio [OR]=2.3, p=0.014), while mutations in ASXL1 (OR=0.46, p=0.012), RUNX1 (OR=0.46, p=0.013) and NRAS (OR=0.49, p=0.04) had independent adverse predictive value. In univariate analysis the shorter OS of FLT3-ITD pts was confined to allele ratios≥ 0.5 (FLT3-ITDhigh, p=0.02). In a multivariate analysis accounting for clinical covariates, mutations in NPM1 (Hazard Ratio [HR] =0.45, p 〈 0.0001) and in SRSF2 (HR=0.64, p=0.03) predicted improved outcome, while FLT3-ITDhigh (HR=2.00, p=0.03), mutations in DNMT3A (HR=1.74, p=0.001), ASXL1 (HR=1.84, p=0.002) and NRAS (HR=1.70, p=0.009), but not RUNX1 or TP53, independently predicted worse OS. Significant interactions (eg. NPM1 - SRSF2, p=0.009, NPM1 - DNMT3A, p=0.03) precluded a simple NPM1-based stratification of pts with non-adv cytogenetics. This led to define a new prognostic hierarchy (Figure). The 49 NPM1mut pts with SRSF2 mutation and/or without adverse co-mutations (FLT3-ITDhighDNMT3A, ASXL1 and NRAS) had a median OS of 49.7 months, defining very low risk. NPM1wt pts without adverse co-mutations (n=114) had a median OS of 30.7 months and were considered at low risk. Among pts with ≥1 adverse co-mutation, NPM1 status had no significant prognostic influence (p=0.18). Regardless of NPM1 status, pts with a single (n=187) or ≥2 (n=38) adverse co-mutations (FLT3-ITDhighDNMT3A, ASXL1 or NRAS) had a median OS of 21.0 and 12.0 months, resp, and were considered at intermediate and high risk, resp. In the 83 pts with adv cytogenetics, TP53 mutations predicted shorter OS (p=0.004). Among pts with adv cytogenetics, those without TP53 mutation had a median OS of 12.6 months and were thus classified as high risk while the median OS of the 30 pts with adv cytogenetics and TP53 mutations was only 5.4 months, defining very high risk disease. This stratification resulted in improved OS prediction compared to the full molecular ELN 2017 (C-index 0.63 vs 0.58, resp). This stratification also predicted Relapse-Free Survival (RFS, Figure, p 〈 0.0001). Censoring at SCT did not affect these results. Conclusion. In AML patients older than 60y treated intensively, mutations in 7 genes (NPM1, SRSF2, FLT3, DNMT3A, ASLX1, NRAS and TP53) can refine the prognosis of cytogenetic sub-groups. Figure Figure. Disclosures Cluzeau: MENARINI: Consultancy; CELGENE: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMA: Consultancy.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0006-4971
,
1528-0020
DOI:
10.1182/blood-2018-99-111144
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Society of Hematology
Publication Date:
2018
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1468538-3
detail.hit.zdb_id:
80069-7
Permalink
