GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 2306-2306
    Abstract: Abstract 2306 In the last few years the usage of third party mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) as therapy for steroid-refractory Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) is constantly increasing and holds big promises. Nevertheless, at our knowledge, studies on MSC efficacy have been scarcely corroborated by biological analysis of patient response to cell infusion. Here, we report the immunological monitoring of 8 patients (7 male, 1 female; aged 4 to 33 years), with steroid-refractory GvHD (grade II to III), who received MSCs, between August 2009 and June 2010. GvHD presented as acute in 6 cases and chronic in 2 cases. In 5 cases GvHD occurred as a single organ pathology (2 skin, 2 gut, 1 liver), while in 3 cases GvHD had multi-organ involvement (1 liver and oral mucosa, 1 skin and oral/ocular mucosa, 1 skin, gut and liver). All patients received 2 to 3 MSC infusions from third party donors aiming at 1 × 106/kg recipient body weight MSCs for each infusion. After MSC therapy, 2 patients showed complete response, 3 patients showed partial response, whereas 3 patients did not respond to MSC infusion. To better comprehend the immunomodulatory effects of MSC infusions, we studied GvHD plasmatic markers, inflammatory cytokines and CD4+ T-cell subsets circulating in the peripheral blood (PB) of enrolled patients before MSC infusion and at day 7, 14 and 28 after cell therapy. In accordance with clinical observations, in patients responding to MSC infusions, we observed a dramatic decrease of three validated GvHD plasmatic markers TNFRI, IL2Rα and elafin (Paczesny S et al. Blood 2009) to the mean levels of Healthy Donors (HD). In particular, at day 28 after therapy, TNFRI and IL2Rα levels decreased of 2 times (range=1.9-2.4 and range=1.4-2.8, respectively) and elafin levels decreased of 2.5 times (range=1.7-3.6). Partially responding patients showed a transient decrease of TNFRI, IL2Rα and elafin levels, while non responding patients showed stable or even increasing levels of all analysed markers. Moreover, we investigated the effect of MSC infusion on lymphocyte counts. We demonstrated that patients responding to MSC infusion, oppositely to non responders, strongly decreased total and CD4+ lymphocyte counts in the PB (mean total T-cell Fold Decrease (FD)=11.85, range=1.3-116; mean CD4+ T-cell FD=12, range=1.5-116). Interestingly, after MSC infusion, CD4+ T-cell subsets changed significantly: Tregs increased and Th1 and Th17 populations decreased, and a new CD4+ cell subset balance was observed starting from day 7 after therapy. In particular, the mean FD of Th1/Treg ratio was 4.1 (range=4-4.2) and the mean FD of Th17/Treg ratio was 4.7 (range=3.3-6). Correspondingly, patient symptoms also gradually improved, suggesting an association between GvHD clinical course and CD4+ T-cell imbalance, reverted by MSCs in responding patients. In partially responding patients Th1/Treg and Th17/Treg showed a transient decreased and even slightly increased in the case of non responding patients. In accordance with the decrease of Th1 CD4+ T cells in the PB of patients responding to MSC infusion, we observed a valuable decrease of IFNγ plasma concentrations (mean FD=48, range=30-65 in complete responders), which reached the levels typical of HD. In summary, despite its limited size, the present study suggests that MSCs, upon infusion, are able to convert an inflammatory environment to a more physiological one, both at a cellular level, promoting the expansion of circulating Tregs, and at a molecular level, diminishing inflammatory cytokines. Further studies on a larger group of patients, clarifying the mechanisms of action used in vivo by MSC to tune ongoing allo-reactions, will be fundamental to provide the rationale for improving current clinical trials. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 19, No. 2 ( 2013-02), p. S135-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 743-743
    Abstract: Abstract 743 Background: Acute Graft versus host disease (aGvHD) is a severe complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Conventional treatment with high dose steroids fails to achieve a complete and sustained response in more than 50% of patients. Several second line treatments have been described but none of these can be considered superior or a standard of care (Paul J. Martin et al, BBMT 2012). Among these treatments, the use of third party mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) has been proposed (LeBlanc et al, Lancet 2008). In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of third party human MSC, in a prospective, multicenter, phase I study (EudraCT 2008–007869-23). Methods: Forty-seven patients with steroid-resistant, acute or chronic grade II-IV GvHD were enrolled into this study. Human MSC were obtained from bone marrow harvests of healthy donors and expanded in vitro using serum free medium supplemented with human platelet lysate (Capelli C et al, BMT, 2007; Capelli C. et al, Cytotherapy 2009). In vitro expanded MSC were produced in two officially authorized Cell Factories and tested in four Italian Hematology Units. The primary endpoint of this study was the safety. Secondary endpoints were the response of GvHD (evaluated 28 days after the last MSC infusion), as well as the overall survival and transplant-related deaths. Blood samples were periodically collected before and after MSC infusion to measure plasma levels of IL2Ralpha by ELISA, as previously described by our group (Dander E et al, Leukemia 2012). Results: Between August 2009, and June 2012, 47 patients (16 children, 31 adults, median age 25.5 years, range 1 to 67) were treated. The median dose of infused MSC was 1.5×106 cells per kg bodyweight. Enrolled patients presented with aGvHD in 37 cases, chronic overlap syndrome in 7 cases, and chronic classic GvHD in 3 cases. Fifteen pts had grade II GvHD, 23 grade III and 9 grade IV, according to NIH criteria. In 17 cases GvHD involved a single organ, in 24 cases 2, and in 6 cases 3 organs. Prior to MSC infusion 22 patients had received only high dose steroids, 12 patients received one cycle of pentostatin (1 mg/kg bodyweight for 3 days, Schmitt T. et al BMT, 2011: 46 580–585), while 13 received other conventional immunosuppressants. Patients received a median of 3 MSC infusions (range 1 to 8). No side effects were registered immediately after MSC infusion and no complications were lately referred as MSC-related. Overall, in 30 patients (63.8%) a clinical response of GvHD was registered. Thirteen of these patients (27.6%) had a complete response and 17 (36.1%) a partial response to treatment. Twenty-two of the 30 responding patients did not require further lines of immunosuppression after MSC infusion. Response was significantly more likely in patients exhibiting grade II GvHD versus those exhibiting more severe gradings (87.5% vs. 51.6%, p = 0.02) and in patients receiving MSC in a time interval of 30 days from the onset of GvHD (75.9% vs. 43.7%, p= 0.05). Current median follow up for this cohort is 200 days (range 30–1066). Responders show a significant lower transplant-related mortality (10.0% vs. 88.2%, p 〈 0.05) and a better overall survival probability than non responders (23.3% vs. 88.2%, p 〈 0.05, Fig. 1). Within the limit of a small subgroup analysis, adult patients receiving pentostatin before MSC had an apparent better response and survival (65% vs 27%, at 1 year), without an increased risk of infections. Measurements of plasmatic levels of IL2Ralpha, when comparing responders vs non-responders patients, showed a statistically significant difference in terms of fold decrease of the marker (p=0.027), corroborating clinical results. Similarly, a significant trend of fold decrease change (p=0.058) was observed when comparing responding patients receiving MSC within or after 30 days from the onset of the disease, in line with clinical results. Conclusions: This study confirms that human MSC prepared in academic cell therapy facilities may represent a safe and effective treatment of patients with steroid-refractory GvHD. Plasmatic inflammatory markers may help in evaluating and monitoring of clinical response. The sequential or combined administration of MSC and other immunosuppressants, such as pentostatin, is equally safe and feasible and deserves further investigation. We suggest to consider the use of MSC promptly, as early as possible, after steroid failure. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 16, No. 9 ( 2010-09), p. 1293-1301
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Stem Cells International, Hindawi Limited, Vol. 2012 ( 2012), p. 1-6
    Abstract: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are tested in clinical trials to treat graft versus host disease (GvHD) after stem cell transplantation (SCT). In vitro studies demonstrated MSC's broad immunosuppressive activity. As infections represent a major risk after SCT, it is important to understand the role of MSC in this context. We analyzed 24 patients (pts) receiving MSC for GvHD in our Unit between 2009 and 2011. We recorded viral reactivations as measured in whole blood with polymerase chain reaction for 100 days following MSC administration. In patients with a documented viral reactivation in the first 3 days following MSCs infusion the frequency of virus-specific IFNgamma-producing cells was determined through enzyme-linked immunospot assay. In our cohort of patients viral reactivation after MSC infusion occurred in 45% of the cases, which did not significantly differ from the incidence in a historical cohort of patients affected by steroid resistant GvHD and treated with conventional immunosuppression. No patient presented severe form of infection. Two cases could be checked for immunological response to viral stimulus and demonstrated virus specific T-cytotoxic lymphocyte activity. In our experience MSC infusion did not prove to trigger more frequent or severer viral reactivations in the post transplantation setting.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1687-966X , 1687-9678
    Language: English
    Publisher: Hindawi Limited
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2573856-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 20, No. 3 ( 2014-03), p. 375-381
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Pediatric Blood & Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 61, No. 5 ( 2014-05), p. 827-832
    Abstract: The aim of this paper is to describe the results of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment in Nicaragua from 1995 to 2005 in the context of an international cooperation program. Procedures Patients 〈 18 years with ALL were treated with two consecutive protocols (1995 and 2000). After a steroid prophase, a three‐drug induction was administered in protocol 1995, and a four‐drug induction, including asparaginase, was administered in protocol 2000. In protocol 2000, a modified BFM phase IB with cyclophosphamide, 6‐mercaptopurine and cytosine arabinoside was administered to patients at high risk (HR), who also received IV methotrexate (500 mg/m 2 ) in the consolidation phase. Reinduction consisted of dexamethasone, vincristine, doxorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and 6‐thioguanine administered over 7 (protocol 1995) or 4 (protocol 2000) weeks; reinduction was repeated twice for patients at HR. Maintenance consisted of p.o. 6‐mercaptopurine and methotrexate, and vincristine and dexamethasone pulses were added in the 2000 study. The total duration of therapy was 24 months. Results In total, 540 patients were treated. Overall, 7% of patients died during induction, and 9% abandoned treatment. At 5 and 10 years from diagnosis, event‐free survival (EFS) rates of 38.1% and 36.6%, respectively, and overall survival rates of 48.0% and 39.6%, respectively, were obtained, considering abandonment as an event. Conclusions In our experience, a 10‐year EFS of 36.6% was achieved in a country with limited resources. Factors limiting a higher success rate were treatment abandonment and a high relapse rate. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:827–832. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1545-5009 , 1545-5017
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2130978-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 13, No. 9 ( 2012-09), p. 936-945
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 873-873
    Abstract: Abstract 873 Background. Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL accounts for 3–5% of pediatric ALL. An international survey on 640 children diagnosed between 1995 and 2005 and treated with chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation (SCT) without the use of tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKI) recently reported an overall 7-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 31.2% and 44.2%, respectively. In those years, only limited experience was accumulated on the use of Imatinib (IM) for children with Ph+ leukemia. The EsPhALL study was designed as an intergroup, open-label, randomized Phase II/III study, within the I-BFM-SG network, to assess the safety and efficacy of IM in association with chemotherapy. Ten national study groups participated in the study: AIEOP, BFM-G/CH, COALL, FRALLE, NOPHO, MRC, DCOG, CPH, PINDA and HONG KONG. Methods. Patients 1 to 18 years of age diagnosed with Ph+ ALL were eligible to the study. After the induction phase according to national treatment protocol, patients were classified as Good Risk (GR) or Poor Risk (PR) according to their response to treatment. GR patients were those who achieved both the early response (i.e. blast cell count 〈 1000/ml in peripheral blood after 7 days of prednisone and a single dose of intrathecal methotrexate or M1/M2 bone marrow at day 15 or M1 at day 21) and the complete remission after the frontline Induction course (1st complete remission, CR1). They were randomized to receive IM in combination with chemotherapy (GR-IM) or chemotherapy alone (GR-noIM). PR patients (those who did not achieved early response or CR1 or both) received IM in combination with chemotherapy. Due to the availability of external evidence, the randomization in GR was stopped in 2009 and an amended trial started, with all patients receiving IM continuously. The chemotherapy regimen was modeled upon a BFM high risk backbone and IM was delivered at the dose of 300 mg/m2/day. SCT in CR1 was recommended for all PR patients (any donor) and for GR patients if a genotype-matched donor (9/10 or 10/10 alleles) was available. The primary analysis for the randomized question (ITT) was on disease-free survival (DFS) in GR and EFS in PR patients, not censoring for SCT in CR1, with comparison based on the log-rank test. Results. Between 01-Jan-2004 and 31-Dec-2009, 178 patients (age 1.5–17.9 years) were enrolled and stratified as GR (108; 61%) or PR (70; 39%). Ninety GR patients were randomized (18 excluded for parental refusal or clinical decision); of these, 77% underwent SCT in CR1. Out of 35 PR patients who were resistant to Induction, 80% achieved CR1 after consolidation (Phase IB). 84% of PR patients received SCT in CR1. Relapse was the first event in 23 (33%), 12 (27%) and 10 (22%) of PR, GR-noIM and GR-IM patients, respectively. The most common site was the bone marrow (74%, 92% and 60% in PR, GR-noIM and GR-IM patients, respectively). Deaths in CR1 were 8, 4 and 2 in PR, GR-noIM and GR-IM patients respectively, none being related to IM. The 4-year DFS was 73% (95% CI: 56% – 84%) in the GR-IM arm and 62% (95% CI: 45% – 75%) in the GR-noIM arm (p=0.24), with a 4-year OS of 85% (95% CI: 70% – 93%) and 73% (95% CI: 54% – 85%), respectively (p= 0.37). A secondary ‘as treated' analysis was performed accounting for 13 patients who switched from GR-noIM to GR-IM, with 4-year DFS of 56% (95% CI: 36% – 72%) and 75% (95% CI: 61% – 85%), respectively (p=0.06). The EFS in PR patients was 54% (95% CI: 40% – 65%) at 2-years and remained constant through 3 and 4 years, with a 4-year OS of 64% (95% CI: 50% – 74%).The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) across the treatment arms were decreased leukocytes, platelets and granulocyte counts, decreased hemoglobin, and infections. There was no significant difference in the overall frequency of AEs across all 3 patients' groups. Severe adverse events rate was 28% in GR-IM group, 32% in GR-noIM and 34% in PR group. Conclusions. Results suggest that the addition of IM to intensive BFM-type chemotherapy regimens was associated with an approximate 10% advantage in long-term DFS in GR patients which, however, the study was not powered to detect. The PR group treated with IM had improved EFS and OS as compared to historical controls. IM was generally well tolerated on top of intensive chemotherapy with a reassuring safety profile. Disclosures: Biondi: BMS, Novartis, Micromed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1467-1467
    Abstract: Abstract 1467 Background. Prognosis of Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) ALL has generally improved after the introduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) on top of chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cells transplantation (SCT). Several studies in children and adults with ALL have shown that MRD status is a strong and independent prognostic factor. In the EsPhALL study, MRD was prospectively measured at relevant time-points (TP), and this allowed us to investigate the prognostic significance in this rare subgroup. Methods. A total of 178 patients aged 1 to 18 years diagnosed with ALL and documented presence of t(9;22)(q34;q11) were enrolled in the EsPhALL study and classified as Good Risk (GR) or Poor Risk (PR) according to early response to induction treatment. GR patients were randomized to receive (GR-IM) or not (GR-noIM) post-induction imatinib, while PR patients received post-induction imatinib along with chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was modeled upon a BFM high risk backbone with all patients receiving four post-induction blocks after which they became eligible to SCT. MRD was analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin genes and T-cell receptor genes at various TP during therapy on a subset of 112 study patients. Results. At baseline (TP1), in 35 GR and 47 PR patients treated with imatinib, positive MRD at any level (n=76) was associated to a lower outcome compared to negative MRD (n=6), although not significantly (4-year EFS (SE) was 60% vs. 100%, p=0.11). In GR patients, MRD at TP2 (i.e. after the first exposure to Imatinib in Protocol IB) was low ( 〈 5×10−4) in 26/30 (87%) patients receiving imatinib, compared to 8/13 (62%) patients not receiving imatinib (p=0.10). MRD at TP2 tends to have a prognostic impact with a 4-year EFS (SE) of 73% (12%), 58% (13%) and 42% (17%) in patients with negative (n=19), 〈 5×10−4 (n=15) and ≥5×10−4 (n=15) MRD levels, respectively (p=0.40). In patients with negative MRD at TP2, 5 did not receive imatinib and 2 relapsed, while 14 received imatinib and 1 relapsed (p=0.15). In patients with positive MRD at any level, 8 did not receive imatinib and 2 relapsed, while 16 received imatinib and 7 relapsed (p=0.66). Among 33 PR patients, MRD was low at TP1 in 2 patients (6%), while it became low in additional 5 patients after TP2 (21%). Of these 7 patients, 2 relapsed, while 7 relapsed among the 26 patients with high MRD (≥5×10−4) at both time-points. Conclusions. The exposure to Imatinib resulted in a reduced tumor load, providing a better quality of molecular remission, which turned to have clinical impact in the outcome. The evaluation of MRD after early exposure to Imatinib has a prognostic impact: low or negative MRD levels at TP2 identify a subgroup of GR patients with a better outcome. To lesser extent the same trend was observed in PR. Altogether, these findings support the current use of MRD at TP2 in clinical trials (amended EsPhALL and BMS CA-180372) to identify those patients eligible for receiving treatment with chemotherapy and TKI only, and accordingly spared SCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...