GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Berger, Tamar  (3)
  • 1
    In: Scientific Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 11, No. 1 ( 2021-06-07)
    Abstract: There is paucity of data regarding the diagnostic yield and safety of skin biopsies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), though skin eruptions are common in these patients. We evaluated 216 patients treated in our hemato-oncology unit at a tertiary medical center between 2007 and 2018 and identified 35 patients who underwent 37 skin biopsies. The majority of biopsies were performed during induction treatment for AML (n = 26, 70%), whereas the remainder of biopsies were done prior to induction initiation (n = 8, 22%) or during consolidation chemotherapy (n = 3, 8%). Pathology findings were inconclusive in 13 cases (35%), while diagnostic biopsies were positive for drug eruptions (24%), leukemia cutis (16%), infections (11%), reactive processes (8%) and Sweet syndrome (5.5%). In almost half of cases (16/37) tissue cultures were performed. Of those, only a quarter (4/16) were positive. Histopathology and tissue culture results altered immediate patient care in 3 cases (8%), yet information obtained from biopsies had potential to affect long term patient care in 8 additional cases (21.6%). Although most skin biopsies were performed while patients had severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, only one patient had a complication due to the biopsy (fever and local bleeding). With the limitation of a retrospective analysis, our study suggests that skin biopsies in patients treated for AML are relatively safe. Although biopsy results infrequently alter immediate patient management, long term effect on patient care expand the potential diagnostic yield of skin biopsies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-2322
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2615211-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 20 ( 2020-09), p. S175-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Hematology ; 2019
    In:  Blood Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5110-5110
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5110-5110
    Abstract: Introduction: Skin eruptions in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients are not uncommon. Skin biopsy is a minimal invasive procedure, yet potential complications, such as infection and bleeding, might be expected in these patients due to immunosuppression and thrombocytopenia. Data are scarce regarding the prevalence, etiology and characteristics of skin eruptions among AML patients during intensive therapies. Even less is known regarding the safety and diagnostic yield of skin biopsies in this setting. We sought to evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of skin biopsies obtained from adult AML patients during hospitalization for intensive chemotherapy. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult AML patients who underwent skin biopsies for histopathology and tissue culture during induction and consolidation treatment for AML at our hemato-oncology unit between 1.1.2007-1.9.2018. Data collection included demographic details, AML characteristics, chemotherapy regimens, clinical description of rush and associated symptoms (mainly fever, pruritus) and laboratory tests. We recorded whether biopsy results had an impact on patients' care. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Results: 37 skin biopsies from AML patients were identified in our cohort during the study period. Patient demographics and rash characteristics are presented in Table 1. 22% of the skin biopsies were performed at AML presentation prior to chemotherapy, and the remainder after chemotherapy commencement, i.e. after starting either induction or post-induction (consolidation or salvage) treatment (70% and 8%, respectively). Most skin eruptions were grade 1 (53%) or 2 (26%) in severity. Only 21% were grade 3 and 4 rashes. The most common body parts involved were the limbs (51%) and trunk (33%). At the time of skin biopsy 43% of patients had associated fever and 11% had bacteremia. Most patients (62%) had grade 4 neutropenia and 38% and 19% of patients had grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Elevated prothrombin time was evident in 66% of patients, whereas 5.5% of patients had an elevated partial thromboplastin time at the time of biopsy. Rash etiology according to skin biopsies histopathological findings consistent with drug eruptions (24.3%), infections (11%), leukemia cutis (16.2%), Sweet syndrome (5.5%) or a reactive process (8%). 35% of biopsies results were inconclusive. In 16 cases (43%) tissue cultures were performed and of those, 4 cultures were positive. However, only in 1 patient the positive culture result has led to a change of antimicrobial coverage. A proactive approach following biopsy results was conducted in 2 additional patients, when a suspected drug leading to the eruption was discontinued (n=1), and systemic steroids were prescribed instead of acyclovir (n=1). Hence, skin biopsy results changed patients' management only in 8% of cases (n=3). Skin biopsies were generally safe and only 1 patient suffered from a complication directly attributed to the biopsy - i.e. she became febrile and suffered from a local hemorrhagic bulla formation, necessitating administration of vancomycin. Conclusions: We suggest that skin biopsies from AML patients hospitalized for intensive chemotherapy treatment are relatively safe. Nevertheless, their diagnostic yield is limited and does not alter the management of most patients. Increased physician discretion should be exercised prior to performing a skin biopsy in this patient population, to avoid unnecessary usage of medical resources and invasive procedures. Further studies are needed to establish the role of skin biopsies in these patients. Disclosures Wolach: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...