GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2021
    Wiley ; 2022
    In:  Academic Emergency Medicine Vol. 29, No. 10 ( 2022-10), p. 1264-1274
    Details
    In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Wiley, Vol. 29, No. 10 ( 2022-10), p. 1264-1274
    Abstract: The objective was to identify the most important and impactful peer‐reviewed global emergency medicine (GEM) articles published in 2021. The top articles are summarized in brief narratives and accompanied by a comprehensive list of all identified articles that address the topic during the year to serve as a reference for clinicians, researchers, and policy makers. Methods A systematic PubMed search was carried out to identify all GEM articles published in 2021. Title and abstract screening was performed by trained reviewers and editors to identify articles in one of three categories based on predefined criteria: disaster and humanitarian response (DHR), emergency care in resource‐limited settings (ECRLS), and emergency medicine development (EMD). Included articles were each scored by two reviewers using established rubrics for original (OR) and review (RE) articles. The top 5% of articles overall and the top 5% of articles from each category (DHR, ECRLS, EMD, OR, and RE) were included for narrative summary. Results The 2021 search identified 44,839 articles, of which 444 articles screened in for scoring, 25% and 22% increases from 2020, respectively. After removal of duplicates, 23 articles were included for narrative summary. ECRLS constituted the largest category ( n  = 16, 70%), followed by EMD ( n  = 4, 17%) and DHR ( n  = 3, 13%). The majority of top articles were OR ( n  = 14, 61%) compared to RE ( n  = 9, 39%). Conclusions The GEM peer‐reviewed literature continued to grow at a fast rate in 2021, reflecting the continued expansion and maturation of this subspecialty of emergency medicine. Few high‐quality articles focused on DHR and EMD, suggesting a need for further efforts in those fields. Future efforts should focus on improving the diversity of GEM research and equitable representation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1069-6563 , 1553-2712
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/acem.v29.10
    DOI: 10.1111/acem.14575
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2029751-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2020
    Wiley ; 2021
    In:  Academic Emergency Medicine Vol. 28, No. 11 ( 2021-11), p. 1328-1340
    Details
    In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 11 ( 2021-11), p. 1328-1340
    Abstract: The objective was to identify, screen, highlight, review, and summarize some of the most rigorously conducted and impactful original research (OR) and review articles (RE) in global emergency medicine (EM) published in 2020 in the peer‐reviewed and gray literature. Methods A broad systematic search of peer‐reviewed publications related to global EM indexed on PubMed and in the gray literature was conducted. The titles and abstracts of the articles on this list were screened by members of the Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) Group to identify those that met our criteria of OR or RE in the domains of disaster and humanitarian response (DHR), emergency care in resource‐limited settings (ECRLS), and EM development. Those articles that met these screening criteria were then scored using one of three scoring templates appropriate to the article type. Those articles that scored in the top 5% then underwent in‐depth narrative summarization. Results The 2020 GEMLR search initially identified 35,970 articles, more than 50% more than last year’s search. From these, 364 were scored based on their full text. Nearly three‐fourths of the scored articles constituted OR, of which nearly three‐fourths employed quantitative research methods. Nearly 10% of the articles identified this year were directly related to COVID‐19. Research involving ECRLS again constituted most of the articles in this year’s review, accounting for more than 60% of the literature scored. A total of 20 articles underwent in‐depth narrative critiques. Conclusions The number of studies relevant to global EM identified by our search was very similar to that of last year. Revisions to our methodology to identify a broader range of research were successful in identifying more qualitative research and studies related to DHR. The number of COVID‐19–related articles is likely to continue to increase in subsequent years.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1069-6563 , 1553-2712
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/acem.v28.11
    DOI: 10.1111/acem.14356
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2029751-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Global Emergency Medicine: A Review of the Literature From 2019
    Wiley ; 2021
    In:  Academic Emergency Medicine Vol. 28, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 117-128
    Details
    In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Wiley, Vol. 28, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 117-128
    Abstract: The annual systematic search of the peer‐reviewed and gray literature relevant to global emergency medicine (EM) was conducted by the Global Emergency Medicine Literature Review (GEMLR) to screen, evaluate, and review the most rigorously conducted and relevant research in global EM published in 2019. Methods After a broad search of PubMed and websites of organizations publishing relevant gray literature, all articles that were deemed relevant to the fields of disaster and humanitarian response, emergency care in resource‐limited settings, and EM development by at least one reviewer, an editor, and the managing editors were then scored by two different reviewers using a 20‐point scoring template relevant to either original research (OR) or review (RE) articles. This scoring system rates articles on their clarity, research design, ethics, importance to global EM, and breadth of impact. Articles that then scored in the top 5% were then critiqued in depth. Results A total of 23,321 article titles and abstracts were screened by 22 reviewers with a wide swath of clinical and research experience in global EM. From these, a total of 356 articles underwent full‐text review and scoring on the 20‐point scale; 26% were categorized as disaster and humanitarian response, 58% as emergency care in resource‐limited settings, and 15% as EM development. Of these 356 articles, 276 (77.5%) were OR articles and 80 (22.5%) were RE articles. The 16 articles that scored in the top 5% ( 〉 17.5 of 20 points) received full in‐depth narrative summaries. Conclusions In 2019, the overall number of studies relevant to global EM that were identified by our search decreased from the prior year, but more high‐scoring articles related to the development of EM clinical practice and as a specialty in resource‐constrained settings were identified.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1069-6563 , 1553-2712
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/acem.v28.1
    DOI: 10.1111/acem.14107
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2029751-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...