GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 16 ( 2013-06-01), p. 2004-2009
    Abstract: In clinical trials, traditional monitoring methods, paper documentation, and outdated collection systems lead to inaccuracies of study information and inefficiencies in the process. Integrated electronic systems offer an opportunity to collect data in real time. Patients and Methods We created a computer software system to collect 13 patient-reported symptomatic adverse events and patient-reported Karnofsky performance status, semi-automated RECIST measurements, and laboratory data, and we made this information available to investigators in real time at the point of care during a phase II lung cancer trial. We assessed data completeness within 48 hours of each visit. Clinician satisfaction was measured. Results Forty-four patients were enrolled, for 721 total visits. At each visit, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflecting toxicity and disease-related symptoms were completed using a dedicated wireless laptop. All PROs were distributed in batch throughout the system within 24 hours of the visit, and abnormal laboratory data were available for review within a median of 6 hours from the time of sample collection. Manual attribution of laboratory toxicities took a median of 1 day from the time they were accessible online. Semi-automated RECIST measurements were available to clinicians online within a median of 2 days from the time of imaging. All clinicians and 88% of data managers felt there was greater accuracy using this system. Conclusion Existing data management systems can be harnessed to enable real-time collection and review of clinical information during trials. This approach facilitates reporting of information closer to the time of events, and improves efficiency, and the ability to make earlier clinical decisions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. e19647-e19647
    Abstract: e19647 Background: In clinical trials, delayed and disorganized data reporting due to traditional toxicity symptom monitoring methods, paper documentation and out-dated collection systems lead to inaccuracies of critical study information and inefficiencies in the process. Electronic systems offer an opportunity to collect this information in real-time from various sources. The feasibility of such an approach is unknown. Methods: We created a computer software system to collect PROs of symptomatic toxicities, automated RECIST-based tumor response, and lab data, and made this information available to investigators in real-time at the point of care during a phase II lung cancer trial. We assessed data completeness within 48hrs of each visit. Clinician satisfaction was measured. Results: We enrolled 44 patients from 1/23/09 to 09/20/11. There were a total of 725 visits, with mean and median being 13 (range, 1-64) and 10, respectively. At each visit, patients completed self-reports using a dedicated wireless laptop 99.6% of the time; only 3 reports were not completed due to lack of a laptop or technical issues with the institutional Intranet. All PROs were completely distributed in batch throughout the system within 24hrs of the visit, and similarly lab data were available for review with a mean of 26hrs from the time the laboratory received the specimen. Manual attribution to lab toxicities in the system took a median of 1 day. Automated RECIST tumor measurements were available to clinicians online with a median of 2 days from the time of imaging; only 8% obtained 〉 7 days after scans were performed. Throughout the trial, there was improvement in data acquisition times (i.e., a “learning curve”). 89% (16/18) of clinicians and research study assistants felt there was greater accuracy in collection of PROs, radiographic responses and trial data. Conclusions: Existing data management systems can be harnessed to enable real-time collection and review of clinical information during trials. This approach facilitates reporting of information closer to the time of events and may improve accuracy and efficiency, as well as ability to make earlier clinical decisions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...