GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (7)
  • Bao, Ting  (7)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e21706-e21706
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e21706-e21706
    Abstract: e21706 Background: Up to 20% of breast cancer survivors develop breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL), and current therapies are limited. In a previous single armed study, acupuncture appeared to reduce BCRL. In this study, we compared our specific protocol of acupuncture (AC) to usual care wait list control (WL). Methods: Women with moderate persistent BCRL were randomized to AC or WL. The AC protocol included twice-weekly manual acupuncture over 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in circumference difference between affected/unaffected arms. Responders were defined as having 〉 30% improvement in arm circumference difference between arms. We also evaluated the change in difference between affected/unaffected arm bioimpedance. We used analysis of covariance for circumference and bioimpedance measurements and Fisher’s exact test for proportion of responders. Results: Among 82 patients, 73 (89%) were evaluable for the primary endpoint (36 in AC and 37 in WL). The median age in AC was 65 (IQR 54, 71) and 58 (IQR 49, 70) in WL. Most patients in both arms had undergone mastectomy (74%) and axillary lymph node dissection (96%), and had a history of prior lymphedema treatment (96%). Median duration of lymphedema was 2.2 years in AC (IQR 1.3, 3.0) and 2.5 years in WL (IQR 1.4, 3.4). We found no evidence of a difference in either arm circumference difference improvement (β -0.38cm, 95% CI -0.89, 0.12, p = 0.14) or bioimpedance difference improvement (β -1.06, 95% CI -7.85, 5.72, p = 0.8) between AC and WL at Week 6. There was also no difference in proportion of responders: 17% AC vs. 11% WL (6% difference, 95% CI -10%, 22%, p = 0.5). No severe adverse events (AE) were reported. Grade 1 treatment-related AEs such as bruising (58%), hematoma (2%), and pain (2%) were reported in patients receiving AC. Among the 837 acupuncture treatments provided, one possibly related grade 2 skin infection was reported. Conclusions: Although it appears to be safe and well tolerated, our acupuncture protocol did not offer additional clinically meaningful reductions in BCRL compared with usual care among patients who had received lymphedema treatment. This regimen should not be recommended for breast cancer survivors with persistent BCRL. Clinical trial information: NCT01706081.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e22201-e22201
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 11522-11522
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 11522-11522
    Abstract: 11522 Background: Cognitive impairment is a prevalent condition among cancer survivors that lacks effective treatment and can be maintained and exacerbated by poor sleep. This study explored whether treating insomnia with acupuncture or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) improves subjective and objective cognitive functions in cancer survivors. Methods: We analyzed cognitive outcomes from a pragmatic randomized trial comparing acupuncture versus CBT-I for cancer survivors with insomnia. Analysis was limited to those reporting cognitive impairment at baseline. Acupuncture and CBT-I were delivered over 8 weeks. Perceived cognitive ability was assessed using the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scale (BADDS). Objective cognitive function was evaluated with the Buschke Selective Reminding Test (BSRT). All outcomes were evaluated at baseline, Week 8 (end of intervention), and Week 20 (12 weeks post-intervention). Results: Among 99 cancer survivors, mean age was 60.4 years, 56.6% were women, and 26.3% were non-white. The most common cancer types were breast (31.3%) and prostate (19.2%). Perceived cognitive ability improved in both acupuncture and CBT-I groups at weeks 8 and 20 relative to baseline (all P 〈 0.001). No significant between-group differences were noted in BADDS total score (p = 0.28), but the CBT-I group demonstrated a better BADDS attention subscale score than the acupuncture group at weeks 8 and 20 (p = 0.031). With regards to objective cognitive functions assessed by BSRT, acupuncture improved attention (p = 0.017), learning (p = 0.040), and memory (p = 0.0020) at Week 8, whereas CBT-I only improved attention at Week 20 (p = 0.0002); between-group differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Among cancer survivors with insomnia, both acupuncture and CBT-I improved cognitive impairment relative to baseline, but their relative effects differed: the CBT-I group showed slightly better subjective attention, whereas the acupuncture group may have improved objective memory. Further investigation of these two therapies may lead to effective and personalized interventions for cancer survivors. Clinical trial information: NCT02356575.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 10001-10001
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 10001-10001
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2016
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e21661-e21661
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 34, No. 15_suppl ( 2016-05-20), p. e21661-e21661
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 12004-12004
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 12004-12004
    Abstract: 12004 Background: The national opioid crisis has created new challenges in oncology pain management and highlighted an urgent need for non-pharmacological treatments. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of electro-acupuncture (EA) and auricular acupuncture (AA) versus usual care (UC) for chronic musculoskeletal pain in cancer survivors. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of cancer survivors experiencing moderate-severe musculoskeletal pain for at least 3 months. EA used a semi-individualized protocol involving electrical stimulation of needles placed in the body. AA used the standardized Battlefield Acupuncture protocol involving up to 10 needles placed in the ears. EA and AA groups received 10 weekly treatments, whereas participants in the UC group received standard care prescribed by their providers. The primary endpoint was average pain severity change measured by the Brief Pain Inventory at week 12 compared to baseline. Functional interference and quality of life were secondary outcomes. We analyzed longitudinal mixed-effects models based on intent-to-treat principles. Results: Among 360 participants, mean age (SD) was 62.1 (12.7) years, 251 (69.7%) were women, and 88 (24.4%) were non-white. Compared from baseline to week 12, EA significantly reduced pain severity by 1.9 points (95% Confidence Interval 1.5-2.3, p 〈 0.001), and AA significantly reduced pain severity by 1.6 points (1.1-2.0, p 〈 0.001). AA was non-inferior to EA at reducing pain severity (p = 0.04). Both EA and AA also significantly improved functional interference (both p 〈 0.001), physical health (both p 〈 0.001), and mental health (p = 0.003, p 〈 0.001) compared to UC. Adverse events (AEs) were mild in both groups; however, 16 (11.2%) in AA stopped treatment due to AEs (mostly ear discomfort) as compared to 1 in EA (0.7%), p = 0.001. Conclusions: Among cancer survivors with chronic musculoskeletal pain, both EA and AA effectively reduced pain and improved quality of life. AA was non-inferior to EA at reducing pain but associated with higher discontinuation rates. These results will guide implementation of acupuncture in oncology care to address the unmet pain management needs of cancer survivors in the era of the opioid epidemic. Clinical trial information: NCT02979574 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e24078-e24078
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e24078-e24078
    Abstract: e24078 Background: CIPN is a common, potentially debilitating, and dose-limiting side effect experienced by cancer survivors. CIPN encompasses symptoms such as pain, numbness, and tingling, which can be measured subjectively by PRO, or semi-objectively by QST; however, little is known about how QST measures differ among patients with and without CIPN, or if QST outcomes correlate with symptom profiles measured by PRO. Methods: CIPN is a common, potentially debilitating, and dose-limiting side effect experienced by cancer survivors. CIPN encompasses symptoms such as pain, numbness, and tingling, which can be measured subjectively by PRO, or semi-objectively by QST; however, little is known about how QST measures differ among patients with and without CIPN, or if QST outcomes correlate with symptom profiles measured by PRO. Results: 116 patients with CIPN and 10 control patients without CIPN were analyzed. NRS and FACT/GOG-Ntx scores were significantly worse in the CIPN group compared to controls (all p 〈 0.001). The mean (Standard Deviation) TT for CIPN and control patients was 3.61 (0.43) and 3.38 (0.32), respectively (p = 0.059), in hands; and 3.86 (0.70) and 3.38 (0.56), respectively (p = 0.043), in feet. The mean VT was 6.06 (3.45) and 3.87 (1.01), respectively (p=0.032), in hands; and 19.14 (11.09) and 8.43 (3.22), respectively (p 〈 0.001), in feet. There was no significant difference in THT between groups. The correlation coefficients between PRO with QST measures in all patients are listed in the table below. Conclusions: Our study suggested that patients with CIPN have significantly worse symptoms and tactile and vibratory threshold measured by QST when compared with controls. Mild to moderate correlations were observed between PROs and QST, suggesting that CIPN symptoms severity correspond to sensory sensitivity. As CIPN presents a diverse range of symptoms, improved quantification of subjective and objective measures for CIPN can help the incorporation of these tools into future clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03183037 and NCT03292328 . [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...