In:
American Behavioral Scientist, SAGE Publications, Vol. 42, No. 8 ( 1999-05), p. 1254-1276
Abstract:
The debate over the relationship between economic development and environmental protection has polarized into the opposing perspectives of win-lose (distributive bargaining) or win-win (integrative bargaining) outcomes, reminiscent of the debate that occurred within the negotiations field 15 years ago. The authors argue that such polarization is unnecessary and inaccurate. Conflict between economics and the environment is neither purely win-win nor win-lose, but rather, it is a mixed-motive situation. In presenting this argument, the authors draw from the negotiations and managerial decision-making literature. Further-more, they consider some strategies for exposing mixed-motive solutions to environmental problems in the future.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0002-7642
,
1552-3381
DOI:
10.1177/0002764299042008002
Language:
English
Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Publication Date:
1999
detail.hit.zdb_id:
206867-9
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1499983-3
SSG:
3,4
SSG:
5,2
Permalink