GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (1)
  • Austin, R.  (1)
  • 2015-2019  (1)
Material
Publisher
  • Cambridge University Press (CUP)  (1)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 2015-2019  (1)
Year
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2016
    In:  British Actuarial Journal Vol. 21, No. 2 ( 2016-07), p. 314-363
    In: British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 21, No. 2 ( 2016-07), p. 314-363
    Abstract: Expert judgement has been used since the actuarial profession was founded. In the past, there has often been a lack of transparency regarding the use of expert judgement, even though those judgements could have a very significant impact on the outputs of calculations and the decisions made by organisations. The lack of transparency has a number of dimensions, including the nature of the underlying judgements, as well as the process used to derive those judgements. This paper aims to provide a practical framework regarding expert judgement processes, and how those processes may be validated. It includes a worked example illustrating how the process could be used for setting a particular assumption. It concludes with some suggested tools for use within expert judgement. Although primarily focussed on the insurance sector, the proposed process framework could be applied more widely without the need for significant changes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1357-3217 , 2044-0456
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2082039-2
    SSG: 3,2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...