In:
Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 19, No. 17 ( 2013-09-01), p. 4634-4637
Abstract:
Purpose: Although the translocation t(4;14) is supposed to be a primary event in multiple myeloma, we have been surprised to observe that in large relapse series of patients, the t(4;14) can be observed only in subpopulations of plasma cells, in contrast to what is seen at diagnosis. This observation raised the question of possible subclones harboring the translocation that would be observable only at the time of relapse. Experimental Design: To address this issue, we analyzed by FISH a cohort of 306 patients for whom we had at least two samples obtained at different disease phases. Results: We observed a “gain” of the t(4;14) in 14 patients, and conversely, a “loss” of the translocation in 11 patients. Two hypotheses were raised: either an acquisition of the translocation during evolution or the existence of small t(4;14)-positive subclones at the time of diagnosis. To address this question, we had the opportunity to analyze two patients at the time of diagnosis by RT-PCR (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) to look for the chimeric Eμ-MMSET transcript, and one patient positive at diagnosis, but negative at relapse. The samples were positive, supporting the second hypothesis. Furthermore, the IGH sequences of two patients who “lose” the t(4;14) were identical at diagnosis and relapse, confirming the existence of a common ancestral clone. Conclusion: Thus, the conclusion of this study is that the t(4;14) is not a primary event in multiple myeloma and that it can be present in silent subclones at diagnosis, but also at relapse. Clin Cancer Res; 19(17); 4634–7. ©2013 AACR.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1078-0432
,
1557-3265
DOI:
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-3866
Language:
English
Publisher:
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Publication Date:
2013
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1225457-5
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2036787-9
Permalink
