GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Neurology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 95, No. 7 ( 2020-08-18), p. e898-e909
    Abstract: To investigate prediction of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) by clinical variables and D-dimer levels. Methods This prospective multicenter study included consecutive patients with clinically possible CVT. On admission, patients underwent clinical examination, blood sampling for D-dimers measuring (ELISA test), and magnetic resonance/CT venography. Predictive value of clinical variables and D-dimers for CVT was calculated. A clinical score to stratify patients into groups with low, moderate, or high CVT risk was established with multivariate logistic regression. Results CVT was confirmed in 26.2% (94 of 359) of patients by neuroimaging. The optimal estimate of clinical probability was based on 6 variables: seizure(s) at presentation (4 points), known thrombophilia (4 points), oral contraception (2 points), duration of symptoms 〉 6 days (2 points), worst headache ever (1 point), and focal neurologic deficit at presentation (1 point) (area under the curve [AUC] 0.889). We defined 0 to 2 points as low CVT probability (negative predictive value [NPV] 94.1%). Of the 186 (51.8%) patients who had a low probability score, 11 (5.9%) had CVT. The frequency of CVT was 28.3% (34 of 120) in patients with a moderate (3–5 points) and 92.5% (49 of 53) in patients with a high (6–12 points) probability score. All low CVT probability patients with CVT had D-dimers 〉 500 μg/L. Predictive value of D-dimers for CVT for 〉 675 μg/L (best cutoff) vs 〉 500 μg/L was as follows: sensitivity 77.7%, specificity, 77%, NPV 90.7%, and accuracy 77.2% vs sensitivity 89.4%, specificity 66.4%, NPV 94.6%, and accuracy 72.4%, respectively. Adding the clinical score to D-dimers 〉 500 μg/L resulted in the best CVT prediction score explored (at the cutoff ≥6 points: sensitivity 83%/specificity 86.8%/NPV 93.5%/accuracy 84.4%/AUC 0.937). Conclusion The proposed new clinical score in combination with D-dimers may be helpful for predicting CVT as a pretest score; none of the patients with CVT showed low clinical probability for CVT and D-dimers 〈 500 μg/L. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00924859.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-3878 , 1526-632X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2020
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Neurology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 92, No. 13 ( 2019-03-26), p. e1517-e1525
    Abstract: To derive and externally validate a copeptin-based parsimonious score to predict unfavorable outcome 3 months after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods The derivation cohort consisted of patients with AIS enrolled prospectively at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. The validation cohort was prospectively enrolled after the derivation cohort at the University Hospital of Bern and University Hospital Basel, Switzerland, as well as Frankfurt a.M., Germany. The score components were copeptin levels, age, NIH Stroke Scale, and recanalization therapy (CoRisk score). Copeptin levels were measured in plasma drawn within 24 hours of AIS and before any recanalization therapy. The primary outcome of disability and death at 3 months was defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 3 to 6. Results Overall, 1,102 patients were included in the analysis; the derivation cohort contributed 319 patients, and the validation cohort contributed 783. An unfavorable outcome was observed among 436 patients (40%). For the 3-month prediction of disability and death, the CoRisk score was well calibrated in the validation cohort, for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.819 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.787–0.849). The calibrated CoRisk score correctly classified 75% of patients (95% CI 72–78). The net reclassification index between the calibrated CoRisk scores with and without copeptin was 46% (95% CI 32–60). Conclusions The biomarker-based CoRisk score for the prediction of disability and death was externally validated, was well calibrated, and performed better than the same score without copeptin. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00390962 (derivation cohort) and NCT00878813 (validation cohort).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-3878 , 1526-632X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2019
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 41, No. 4 ( 2010-04), p. 802-804
    Abstract: Background and Purpose— Spontaneous vertebral artery dissection (sVADs) mainly cause cerebral ischemia, with or without associated local symptoms and signs (headache, neck pain, or cervical radiculopathy), or with local symptoms and signs only. Methods— We compared the presenting characteristics of consecutive patients with single sVADs and ischemic events and those with local symptoms and signs only. Results— Of the 186 patients with first-ever unilateral sVAD, 165 (89%) presented with cerebral ischemia, and 21 (11%) presented with local symptoms and signs only. Patients with sVAD and ischemia were more often male (63% vs 29%; P =0.002), older (mean±SD age, 43.6±9.9 vs 38.6±9.0 years; P =0.027), and smokers (14% vs 3%; P =0.010), but less often, they had a history of migraine without aura (17% vs 38%; P =0.025) than did patients without ischemia. The multivariate analysis confirmed independent associations between male sex ( P =0.024), increasing age (0.027), and smoking ( P =0.012) and sVADs causing cerebral ischemia. Conclusions— These results suggest that men, older patients, and smokers with sVADs may be at increased risk for ischemic events.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 49, No. Suppl_1 ( 2018-01-22)
    Abstract: Background: Data on endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with stroke attributable to CeAD is scarce. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies comparing EVT to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in CeAD-patients and compared EVT to IVT with regard to 3-month outcome and complications. Additionally, we included data of IVT-/EVT-treated CeAD-patients from a Swiss multicenter IVT-/EVT registry based cohort study. Methods: We systematically searched the pubmed® database to identify all existing studies comparing IVT to EVT in CeAD-patients. Studies were eligible if IVT-treated CeAD- patients were compared to EVT-treated patients, and 3-month outcomes were reported as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Outcome measures in this study were favorable 3-month outcome (i.e. mRS 0-2), excellent 3-month outcome (i.e. mRS 0-1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and death. Additionally, in a Swiss multicenter IVT-/EVT registry based cohort-study (SWISS) we identified all consecutive patients with ischemic stroke attributable to CeAD and included outcome data of these patients in our analyses. In a meta-analysis across all studies, we compared EVT to IVT with regard to primary and secondary outcome measures using a fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel model. Results: The literature search yielded 388 results. We identified 7 eligible studies for a systematic comparison of EVT versus IVT. Data on 62 patients from the SWISS cohort were included as an additional study. In total, we compared EVT (n=102) versus IVT (n=110) in 212 CeAD-patients. With regard to the occurrence of mRS 0-2, there was no significant difference between both treatment groups (OR 1.04 (95% CI 0.57-1.88)). Separate Data on mRS 0-1 was available in 5 studies (OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.39-2.00)). There was no difference between groups with regard to death at 3 months (OR 0.66 (0.22-1.94)) which was separately reported in 6 studies. For sICH there were too few data (n=5 patients) available for meta-analysis. Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of all existing studies comparing EVT to IVT in CeAD patients there was no clear signal of superiority of EVT. Further investigation of EVT with up-to-date devices is warranted.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Stroke, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 49, No. 5 ( 2018-05), p. 1170-1175
    Abstract: The impact of smoking on prognosis after stroke is controversial. We aimed to assess the relationship between smoking status and stroke outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in a large cohort study by adjusting for potential confounders and incorporating recanalization rates. Methods— In a prospective observational multicenter study, we analyzed baseline and outcome data of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Using uni- and multivariable modeling, we assessed whether smoking was associated with favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1) and mortality. In addition, we also measured the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and recanalization of middle cerebral artery. Patients reporting active cigarette use were classified as smokers. Results— Of 1865 patients, 19.8% were smokers (n=369). They were younger (mean 63.5 versus 71.3 years), less often women (56% versus 72.1%), and suffered less often from hypertension (61.3% versus 70.1%) and atrial fibrillation (22.7% versus 35.6%) when compared with nonsmokers. Favorable outcome and 3-month mortality were in favor of smokers in unadjusted analyses (45.8% versus 39.5% and 9.3% versus 15.8%, respectively), whereas symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was comparable in both cohorts. Smoking was not associated with clinical outcome and mortality after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–1.61; P =0.197 and odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.68–1.71; P =0.755, respectively). However, smoking still independently predicted recanalization of middle cerebral artery in multivariable analyses (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.11–6.43; P =0.028). Conclusions— Our study suggests that good outcome in smokers is mainly related to differences in baseline characteristics and not to biological effects of smoking. The higher recanalization rates in smokers, however, call for further studies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0039-2499 , 1524-4628
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1467823-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...