GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Efficacy and Toxicity Profile of Elotuzumab for Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    American Society of Hematology ; 2018
    In:  Blood Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5640-5640
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5640-5640
    Abstract: Background: Elotuzumab (elo) is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which has been approved by the FDA for use in combination with lenalidomide (lena) and dexamethasone (dexa) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Elotuzumab is effective as a single agent, as well as in combination for multiple myeloma treatments, supporting the use of elo in pts with RRMM and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) pts. Method: After review of literature using database searches was done on 6/27/18 (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Clinical Trials.gov), 9 prospective and 1 retrospective study with 1128 enrolled pts met the inclusion criteria to date in RRMM and 2 clinical trials including 123 pts in NDMM (Table 1). CMA software v.3 was used for meta-analysis. A random-effect model was applied. Result: Regimens used in RRMM: Based on pooled analysis (95% CI), an overall response rate (ORR) of 66% (54-76.2) was calculated in 685 evaluable pts treated with elo based regimens in RRMM (Figure 1). Most common grade (G) ≥ 3 hematological adverse events (HAE) and non-hematological adverse events (NHAE) based on regimen were calculated using pooled analysis in RRMM pts (Table 2). Anemia was noted in 12.1% ( 7.7-18.6) in 559 pts, while neutropenia in 14.5% (7.5-26.4) out of 591 pts and thrombocytopenia (tcp) in 11.9% (7.9-17.4) in 198 evaluable pts. Diarrhea 5.5% (3.6-8.3), pyrexia 2.4% (1.5-4), peripheral neuropathy (PN) 8.4% (3.8-17.8) were measured in 626, 668 and 143 pts respectively. Elotuzumab as monotherapy: 1 study (n=34) evaluated the efficacy of elo as single agent in RRMM. The median age, time from diagnosis and number of prior therapies were 64.5 years (y) (46-87), 4.4 y (0.9-12.8) and 4.5 y (2-10) respectively. It produced an ORR of 1.4% (0.1-19.1 95% CI) in 34 evaluable pts. Adverse events recorded were pyrexia and fatigue in 17.6% and 8.8% pts respectively. Elotuzumab in two drug regimen: In RRMM, 2 clinical trials (n=49) evaluated the efficacy (95% CI) of elo, ORR of 25% (4.1-72.3) was calculated. The best PFS (progression free survival) produced was in combination of elo 20 mg with bortezumib (bort) 1.3mg/m2 of 9.46 months as compared to 1.8 months when elo10mg/kg + dexamethasone (dexa) 28mg was used. In our analysis for safety, common G≥ 3 HAE calculated were, thrombocytopenia 8.7% (3.3-21.1) n=49, neutropenia 10.7 % (3.5-28.4) n=28 pts and anemia 7.1% (1.8-24.5) n=28 pts. NHAE included diarrhea 1.7% (0.1-22.3), PN 10.7% (3.5-28.4), pyrexia 1.7% (0.1-22.3) in 28 evaluable pts each. Elotuzumab in three drug regimen: In RRMM, 10 clinical trials including 602 pts evaluated the efficacy of elo as a part of triple drug regimen, producing an ORR of 72.2% (54-76.2). The best results were produced with the combination of elo 10-20mg/kg + lenalidomide (lena) 25mg + dexa 40mg producing a PFS of 32.2 mo and 28.62 mo in its phase I and II cohorts respectively. Based on pooled analysis (95% CI) common HAE calculated were neutropenia 17.5% (7.6-35.4) in n=563, thrombocytopenia 12.7% (8.2-19.4) in n=149 and anemia 13% (8-20.5) in n=531 pts. Common G ≥ 3 NHAE estimated were diarrhea 5.7% (3.7-8.6), PN 6.6% (2-19.2), pyrexia 2.5% (1.5-4.1) in 598, 115 and 640 pts respectively. Elotuzumab based regimen in NDMM: A currently ongoing clinical trial NCT02272803 has produced promising results in NDMM pts. As a part of three drug regimen with dose of elo 10mg/kg-20mg/kg, lena 25mg, dexa 20mg in 40 pts produced an ORR of 87.5% (73.2-95.8) versus control group of lena 25mg plus dexa 40mg in 42 pts with an ORR of 73.8% (58-86.1). The PFS rate recorded at 1 year was 93% (79-98%) and 91% (73-97%) respectively. The HAE G ≥ 3 included, neutropenia 18% and leukopenia 15%. In another study with 41 pts, elo was used in combination with lena, bort and dexa producing an ORR of 100% and greater than grade 3 adverse events including Tcp 15%, PN 2%. Conclusion: Results produced in our study suggest that elotuzumab is highly effective when used in pts with RRMM and NDMM. Combination regimens for elo produces an ORR ranging from 79-83% with elo + lena+ dexa, proving that the best results were produced by three drug regimens. Large prospective studies are required to evaluate efficacy and safety of elotuzumab in combination therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-117209
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Antibody Based Three-Drug Regimens for Multiple Myeloma - a Systematic Review of Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trials
    American Society of Hematology ; 2019
    In:  Blood Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5546-5546
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5546-5546
    Abstract: Introduction Elotuzumab is monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically targets signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7) that is present on myeloma cells. It fights myeloma cells by stimulating phagocytic action of NK cells and via ADCC (antibody‐dependent cell‐mediated cytotoxicity) pathway. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 mAb with dual mechanisms of action i.e. tumoricidal and immunomodulation. The aim of this study is to review the efficacy and toxicity of elotuzumab and daratumumab based 3-drug combinations in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane and Web of Science was performed for elotuzumab and daratumumab based regimen in MM patients from inception to June 12, 2019. Out of 604 studies, 08 phase II and III clinical trials based on 3-drug regimen were finalized. Results Total 2809 patients (pts) were evaluated out of 2879 enrolled pts. 856 were newly diagnosed (ND) and 1953 were relapsed/refractory (R/R). Elotuzumab (E) based 3-drug regimen were evaluated in 560 whereas daratumumab (D) based 3-drug regimen were analyzed in 889 pts. ELOQUENT-3 trial (n=117) in phase II used E + pomalidomide (P) and dexamethasone (d) (EPd) for R/R pts with ≥2 prior therapies. Median (m) progression free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (mo) in EPd versus (vs) 4.6 mo in Pd arm [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.54 (95% CI: 0.34-0.86; p=0.008)], i.e. 46% lower risk of progression or death in EPd vs Pd arm. ORR (overall response rate) was 53% (complete response [CR] 5% + stringent CR [sCR] 3% + partial response [PR] 33% + very good partial response [VGPR] 12%) in EPd vs 26% in Pd arm (odds ratio [OR] : 3.25 (1.49-7.11). Grade (G) ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were anemia (10%), neutropenia and infections (13% each). (Dimopoulos et al. 2018). Phase II trial by Jakubowiak et al. (2016) observed 1 year (y) PFS of 39% in E-Bortezomib(B)-d vs 33% in Bd arm in 152 R/R pts (HR: 0.72; p = .09) with 28% decrease in progression or death with EBd vs Bd. ORR was 66% (4% CR+ 33% VGPR + 30% PR) vs 63%. OS (overall survival) at 1 y was 85% (EBd) and 74% (Bd) (HR:0.6). G≥3 AEs were infections (21%), thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy (9% each). In phase II trial, ELd (E-Lenalidomide-d) arm yielded ORR of 88% (CR 3% + sCR 5% + PR 43% + VGPR 38%) vs 74% in Ld arm in 82 ND pts. PFS at 1 yr was 93% vs 91%. G≥3 AEs included neutropenia (18%) and leukopenia (15%). (Takezako et al. 2017). Berenson et al. (2017) in phase II trial (n=70) studied G≥3 infusion reactions (IRs) using ELd in ND and R/R pts. ORR was 70% (CR 6% + VGPR 27% + PR 37%). G3 AEs included anemia in 10% pts (no G3 IRs). ELOQUENT-2 trial randomized 646 R/R pts in phase III. PFS at 4 y is 21% vs 14% (HR: 0.71, 0.59-0.86; p= .0004), favoring ELd with 29% reduction in myeloma progression or death. With VGPR of 30%, ORR was 79% vs 66 % (ELd vs Ld) with HR: 0.77; 0.62-0.95; p = 0.0176. OS at 4 y was 50% vs 43% (HR: 0.78; 0.63-0.96). G≥3 AEs included lymphocytopenia (79%), neutropenia (36%), anemia (20%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). (Dimopoulos et al, 2018). POLLUX trial used daratumumab (D)-Ld regimen in 569 R/R patients in phase III. PFS at 3 y was 55% vs 27% (DLd vs Ld) in pts with 1-3 prior therapies. With 56% CR and 80% VGPR; ORR was 93% vs 76%. DLd arm achieved 30% minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status compared to 5% in Ld arm (p 〈 0.001). OS at 3-yr was 34% vs 42%. G≥3 AEs were neutropenia (55%), anemia (18%), thrombocytopenia (15%) and pneumonia (14%). (Bahlis et al. 2018). CASTOR trial in phase III (n=498) showed 18-mo PFS of 48% vs 7.9% in DBd vs Bd arm in R/R pts (HR: 0.31 (0.24-0.39); p 〈 0.0001). ORR was 83.8% (CR 28.8%+ sCR 8.8% + VGPR 62.1%) vs 63.2% (p 〈 0.001). DBd-treatment led to 11.6% MRD-negative status vs 2.4% in Bd-treated pts (p=0.000034). Thrombocytopenia (45.7%), anemia (15.2%) and neutropenia (13.6%) were G≥3 AEs. (Spencer et al. 2018). A Phase III trial (n=737) observed 30 mo PFS of (66 vs 52) % in ≥75 y old pts [HR 0.63 (0.44-0.92)] with DLd vs Ld arms in ND transplant ineligible pts with ORR of (90 vs 81) % (≥CR 41% + ≥VGPR 77%). MRD- negative rate was (19 vs 8) % in DLd vs Ld arms respectively. G≥3 AEs were neutropenia (60%), lymphopenia (19%), anemia (16%), pneumonia (15%) and leukopenia (12%). 〈 75 y old showed ORR of (95 vs 82) % with 30 mo PFS of (75 vs 58) % in both arms. (Usmani et al 2019). Conclusion: Elotuzumab and daratumumab based 3-drug combinations showing great improvements in ORR, PFS and OS of ND and RR MM patients with favorable toxicity profile. Disclosures Anwer: In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-121999
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Efficacy of Elotuzumab Based Combinations in Patients with Multiple Myeloma - a Systematic Review
    American Society of Hematology ; 2019
    In:  Blood Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5548-5548
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 134, No. Supplement_1 ( 2019-11-13), p. 5548-5548
    Abstract: Introduction Multiple myeloma afflicted cells express signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7 (SLAMF7). Elotuzumab; a monoclonal antibody (mAb), targets SLAMF7 and fights myeloma cells by stimulating phagocytic action of natural killer (NK) cells and via antibody‐dependent cell‐mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) pathway. This study focuses on the clinical utility and tolerability of elotuzumab based combinations in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods Literature search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane and Web of Science was performed from inception to June 12, 2019 for elotuzumab based combinations in MM patients. Total of 06 phase II and phase III clinical trials were selected for systematic review out of 292 studies. Results Elotuzumab (E) based combinations were evaluated in 1075 patients (pts) out of 1115 enrolled pts. 119 were newly diagnosed (ND) and 956 were relapsed/refractory (RR) patients. Newly Diagnosed MM patients: Takezako et al. 2017; in phase II trial, showed overall response rate (ORR) of 88% (complete response [CR] 3% + stringent CR [sCR] 5% + partial response [PR] 43% + very good partial response [VGPR] 38%) with ELd (E-Lenalidomide-dexamethasone) arm vs 74% in Ld arm in 82 ND pts. Progression free survival (PFS) at 1 year (y) was 93% versus (vs) 91%. Grade (G) ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (18%) and leukopenia (15%). Relapsed/Refractory MM patients: E-Bortezomib(B)-d arm in a phase II trial by Jakubowiak et al. (2016) showed 1 y PFS of 39% vs 33% in Bd arm in 152 RR pts (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; p = .09) with 28% decrease in progression or death with EBd vs Bd arm. Objective response rate (ORR) w as 66% (4% CR+ 33% VGPR + 30% PR) vs 63%. OS (overall survival) at 1 y was 85% (EBd) and 74% (Bd) (HR: 0.6). G≥3 AEs were infections (21%), thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy (9% each). Mateos et al. (2016) in phase II trial (n=40) evaluated E-T (thalidomide)-d with or without Cy (cyclophosphamide) in heavily pre-treated RR pts. Pts received Cy if they failed to achieve PR by the 5th cycle or because of progressive disease (PD). Responses were better with ETd vs ETdCy. ORR was 38% (95% CI: 23-54) in ETd vs 9% (95% CI: 0-41) in ETdCy. Entire study yielded median PFS (mPFS) of 3.9 months (mo) (95% CI: 2.79%-9.43%) with 1-y PFS of 30% and mOS of 16.3 mo (95% Cl: 8.87%-25.66%) with 1-y survival rate of 63%. G≥3 AEs were lymphopenia (50%), anemia (20%), leucopenia (20%) and respiratory tract infections (RTI) (8%). Dimopoulos et al. 2018 studied E + pomalidomide (P) + d (EPd) for RR pts with ≥2 prior therapies in phase II ELOQUENT-3 trial (n=117). EPd arm yielded mPFS of 10.2 mo vs 4.6 mo in Pd arm [HR: 0.54 (95% CI: 0.34-0.86; p=0.008)], i.e. 46% lower risk of progression or death in EPd vs Pd arm. ORR was 53% (CR 5% + sCR 3% + PR 33% + VGPR 12%) in EPd vs 26% in Pd arm (odds ratio [OR] : 3.25 (1.49-7.11). G≥3 AEs were anemia (10%), neutropenia and infections (13% each). Phase III ELOQUENT-2 trial randomized 646 RR pts. PFS at 4 y was 21% vs 14% (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59-0.86; p= .0004), favoring ELd with 29% reduction in myeloma progression or death. With VGPR of 30%, ORR was 79% vs 66 % (ELd vs Ld) with HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.95; p = 0.0176. OS at 4 y was 50% vs 43% (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.63-0.96). G≥3 AEs included lymphocytopenia (79%), neutropenia (36%), anemia (20%) and thrombocytopenia (21%). (Dimopoulos et al, 2018). Newly Diagnosed & Relapsed/Refractory MM patients: Phase II trial (n=70) by Berenson et al. (2017) studied G≥3 infusion reactions (IRs) using ELd in ND (n=37) and RR (n=33) pts. ORR was 78% (95% CI: 62%‐90%) for ND and 61% (95% CI: 42%‐77%) for RR pts. Other response rates were CR 6%, VGPR 27% and PR 37% in all patients. G3 AEs included anemia in 10% pts (no G3 IRs were seen). Conclusion: Elotuzumab based combinations showing promising outcomes in terms of ORR, PFS and OS for ND and RR MM patients with tolerable toxicity profile. More clinical studies with elotuzumab in unique and newer combinations need to be tested in prospective trials. Disclosures Anwer: In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood-2019-122395
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The Use of Checkpoint Inhibitors before and after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantion: A Double-Edged Sword
    American Society of Hematology ; 2018
    In:  Blood Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5722-5722
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5722-5722
    Abstract: Introduction: Allogenic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative option for hematological malignancies. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have been successful in achieving remission for patients that relapse after allo-SCT. CPI can help relapsed/refractory (RR) patients to respond and bridge towards allo-SCT after achieving remission. Check point inhibition after allo-SCT carries an increased benefit of graft vs malignancy effect (GvL) but it may exaggerate the risk of immune system related toxicity such as graft versus host disease (GvHD). Methods: To assess the safety and efficacy of CPI use in conjunction with allo-SCT, after a comprehensive literature search, we included data (n=283) from a total of twenty-four studies (11 original manuscripts, 13 case reports or case series) and analysed the results. Results: Most common indication for CPI use was Hodgkin lymphoma (n=182). CPIs used in various studies included CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab, n=93) and PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, n=167 and pembrolizumab, n= 27). In patients who were exposed to CPI before allo-SCT (n=107), 56% patients developed acute (a) GvHD and 29% patients developed chronic (c) GvHD. The overall mortality risk (11/107) associated with GvHD was 11%. Interval between last dose of CPI and allo-SCT ranged from 28-62 days. Median cycles of CPI therapy ranged from 4-9 cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was observed (42/62) to be 68% patients with complete remission (CR) in 47% patients and partial remission (PR) in 21% patients. Most common adverse events reported were non-infectious febrile syndrome (12%), infections (5%), hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (4%) and encephalitis (3%). In patients (n=150) who received CPI after allo-SCT for treatment of disease relapse, 13% patients developed aGvHD and 11% patients developed cGvHD. The overall mortality risk with GvHD was around 7% in this population. The interval between allo-SCT and first dose of CPI ranged from 12.5 months to 29 months. Nivolumab was given at doses 1 mg/kg to 3 mg/kg, weekly or two-weekly. Ipilimumab dose ranged from 0.1 mg/kg to 5 mg/kg. A combination with lenalidomide was also tried. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg/kg every three weeks. An ORR of 48% (59/123) was observed with CR in 34 (28%), PR in 25 (20%) and disease stabilization in 7 (6%) patients. Complications, other than GvHD, include hematological side effects (22%), most notably neutropenia followed by respiratory and hepatic complications (16% and 14% respectively). Thirteen case reports evaluated safety and efficacy of CPIs after allo-SCT. Among 26 cases, the reported ORR was 85% with fifteen and seven patients achieving CR and PR, respectively. Of the four patient deaths that occurred during the study period, one died of GvHD. Most common adverse reactions noted were in the GI tract, notably hepatitis (32%), followed by skin (25%) and pulmonary disease (25%). Conclusion: CPI use before and after allo-SCT can be highly effective for relapse disease control. For patients who received Allo-SCT, CPI exposure can lead to significantly increased risk of GvHD, GvHD related morbidity and mortality. There is need for caution while making decision for CPI use in this population. Prospective well-designed clinical trials are required to further explore the safety of CPIs in allo-SCT setting. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-110006
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Evidence Based Recommendations for Supportive Care in Multiple Myeloma
    American Society of Hematology ; 2018
    In:  Blood Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 1952-1952
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 1952-1952
    Abstract: Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with end organ damage that negatively impacts the quality of life (QOL)and supportive care has a potential to improve symptoms. Methods: After detailed search on Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and Clinical Trials.gov, we finalized total 36 articles on supportive care published after 2004. Results: Management of skeletal events: Mhaskar et al. (2017, n=3257) compared bisphosphonates (BPs) with placebo (PBO) in preventing pathological vertebral fractures, skeletal-related events (SRE), reported risk ratio (RR) of 0.74 in each; 95% CI 0.62-0.89 and 0.63-0.88 respectively. Both zoledronic acid (ZA) and clodronic acid prevent SRE, but mortality rate was better reduced with ZA (hazard ratio [HR]=0.84; p=0.0118), (Gareth et al. 2010, n=1960). In a study by Zuradelli et al. (2009, n= 240); hypocalcemia developed in 93 (38.8%) patients on ZA for a median of 2.3 months (range, 0-34.9). Vitamin D and calcium replacement is essential in patients developing hypocalcemia with BPs, (Kennel et al. 2009). Vertebral augmentation procedures improved pain after compression fracture (n=923) by 4.8, 4.6 and 4.4 points at 1 week, 1 year and beyond 1 year respectively, (Khan et al. 2014). Valerie et al. (2011, n=84) analyzed improvement in bone pain with radiotherapy (median 45 grays) in 92 % patients. Prophylaxis of infections: Leng et al. (2018, n=70,687) observed reduced risk of herpes zoster (HZ) reactivation in patients on bortezomib or carfilzomib + HZ prophylaxis (2.4%) vs 5.8% in non-prophylactic group, (attributable risk reduction: 0.42; 95% CI 0.31-0.56). Teh et al. (2016, n=199) reported reduced risk of varicella zoster virus reactivation with valacyclovir (500 mg) in patients on bortezomib based therapy and following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) vs no prophylaxis (HR=0.06 vs 16.9; p 〈 0.01). Dimopoulos et al. (2016, n=569) found higher risk of pneumonia, 8.2% in daratumumab group (n=286) vs 7.8% in control group (n=283). Prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole reduced risk of PCP in 85% patients after ASCT (RR=0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.62), Stern et al. (2014, n=1000). Incidence of Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), noninvasive CAP and invasive pneumococcal disease in elderly population (≥65 years) was seen in 49, 33 and 7 patients on Pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine group as compared to 90, 60 and 28 patients in placebo group respectively, (Bonten et al. 2015, n=84,496). Role of plasmapheresis in renal impairment (RI): Alkhatib et al. (2017) showed that plasmapheresis reduced dialysis dependency by removing serum free light chains (sFLC) in patients with RI (n=147), (RR 0.45; P = 0.02). Yu-X et al. (2015, n=147), showed lower 6-month dialysis dependency ratio with plasmapheresis and chemotherapy (PP + CTH) vs CTH alone, (15.6% vs 37.2%; RR=2.02; p = 0.04). High cut-off hemodialysis lowered sFLC level in 61% (n=42) and 63% patients at day 12 and 21 respectively. Out of these, 71% and 69% patients became dialysis independent, (Hutchison et al. 2012, n=67). Peripheral neuropathy (PN): Bortezomib caused PN in 124/331 (37%) patients (Richardson et al. 2009) whereas with thalidomide, the incidence of PN was 38% and 73% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, (Mileshkin et al. 2006, n=75). PN improved in 68% patients on bortezomib with dose modifications (n=72) vs 47% patients, without dose modification (n=19). (Table 1 and 2). Significant improvement in PN was seen with duloxetine vs placebo (1.06 vs. 0.34; p= 0.003), (Smith et al. 2013, n=231). Arbaiza et al. (2007, n=36) showed improvement in neuropathic pain with tramadol (p= 〈 0.001). Epoetin and derivates for anemia: Castelli et al. (2017, n= 31; median creatinine 1.2 mg/dL (0.8-3.0)) reported hemoglobin (Hb) increase of ≥1g/dL and ≥2g/dL in 71% and 31.7% patients respectively with epoetin α, transfusions requirement reduced from 2.39 ± 1.05 to 1.23 ± 1.36 (p 〈 0.001). Begiun et al. (2013, n= 72) compared the effect of darbepoetin (D) ± iron (Fe) vs placebo on erythroid recovery after ASCT. All patients receiving D + Fe achieved Hb ≥13 g/dL (p 〈 0.0001). Tonia et al. (2012, n= 16,093) showed 35% decrease in transfusion need with erythropoietin stimulating agents (RR=0.65; 95% CI 0.62-0.68). (Table 3) Conclusion: Along with anti-myeloma chemotherapy therapy, management of complications (anemia, infections, renal insufficiency) and other associated symptoms is necessary to improve the quality of life. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-110748
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Efficacy and Safety of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma - a Systematic Review of Early Phase Clinical Trials
    American Society of Hematology ; 2018
    In:  Blood Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5629-5629
    Details
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5629-5629
    Abstract: Introduction Recent studies in novel therapies have created opportunities for new treatment regimens to be used in the management of multiple myeloma. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors lead to epigenetic manipulation of multiple myeloma (MM) cells by reducing resistance to pro-apoptotic signals. Panobinostat is an FDA approved HDAC inhibitor for multiple myeloma. The aim of this article is to study the safety, efficacy and dose limiting toxicities of HDAC inhibitors in the early phase clinical trials in multiple myeloma. Methods We performed a comprehensive literature search for phase I & I/II trials of HDAC inhibitors during last ten years using following databases: PubMed, Embase, AdisInsight, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Studies involving HDAC inhibitors in multiple myeloma other than panobinostat irrespective of the age, sex or specific eligibility criteria were included. Results Out of 2537 studies, we included 25 trials (23 phase I, 2 phase I/II) of HDAC inhibitors in this systematic review having a total of 518 patients. Of these, 471(90.9%) patients were evaluable for response. Vorinostat (Vor) is the most studied drug used in 13 trials (n=281). Two trials had Vor-only regimen and the remaining 11 had combination regimens mostly with lenalidomide and bortezomib. Vor, in combination with lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V) and dexamethasone (d) has showed 100% overall response rate (ORR) in 30 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, (Kaufmann et al., 2016), fifty two percent patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR) and 28% patients showed complete response (CR). Another study using Vor + R regimen after autologous stem cell transplant in 16 NDMM patients showed VGPR in 7, stringent complete response (sCR) in 4, partial response (PR) in 2 and CR in 3 patients (Sborov et al.). Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 1 patient in this study. Richter et al, 2011 showed an ORR of 24% in 29 relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients with Vor only regimen. Another study (Kaufmann et al., 2012) with Vor only regimen used in 10 RRMM patients showed stable disease (SD) in 9 and minimal response (MR) in 1 patient. ORR of 65% was achieved in 31 RRMM patients receiving Vor in combination with doxorubicin & bortezomib (Vorhees et al, 2017). Thrombocytopenia & neutropenia were reported in 94% and 59% patients respectively. Ricolinostat in combination with Rd and Vd achieved an ORR of 55% and 29% respectively in two studies with 38 and 57 evaluable patients (NCT01583283, NCT01323751). Another ricolinostat regimen with pomalidomide & dexamethasone achieved ≥PR in 6/11 RRMM patients (Madan et al., 2016). Table 1 illustrates the efficacy, number of patients and regimens used in all the studies in this systematic review. Quisinostat in a 2017 study by Moreau P et al. (NCT01464112) showed an ORR of 88% in a combination regimen with Vd in RRMM patients (N=18). Drug related adverse events were seen in 13 patients, thrombocytopenia being most common in 11 patients, 2 patients had grade 3 cardiac disorders and 1 patient had a cardiac arrest. Romidepsin in a phase I/II study (Harrison et al., 2011) combined with Vd was used in 25 RRMM patients. ORR was 60% with VGPR n=7, CR n=2, PR n=6, SD n=5 and PD n=1. Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia in 16, neutropenia in 9 and peripheral neuropathy in 2 patients was seen. Popat et al used combination of two HDAC inhibitors CHR 3996 and tosedostat in 20 RRMM patients. ORR was 10% and SD was seen in 30% patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities seen were thrombocytopenia (n=12), leukopenia (n=6) and diarrhea (n=5). A phase I study on AR-42 drug in 17 RRMM patients (Sborov et al., 2017) showed SD in 10, PD in 4, MR in 3 patients with progression free survival (PFS) of 8.2 months. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and lymphopenia were seen in 11, 10 and 6 patients respectively. A detail of all grade 3 and higher adverse events along with dose limiting toxicity is given in table 2. Three trials (NCT02576496, NCT01947140, NCT03051841) of Edo-S101, romidepsin and CKD-581 are currently recruiting with 84, 93 and 18 planned number of patients. Conclusion Regimens containing vorinostat have shown an ORR up to 100% in NDMM patients. HDAC inhibitors have also shown promising efficacy up to 88% ORR in RRMM population. Majority of the patients developed cytopenias as hematological adverse events. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-99-114019
    RVK:
    XA 33000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...