GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Antin, Joseph H.  (3)
  • 2005-2009  (3)
  • 2005  (3)
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 105, No. 4 ( 2005-02-15), p. 1810-1814
    Abstract: Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is increasingly used in older patients. The impact of the shift from myeloablative transplantation to NST on relapse, transplant complications, and outcome has yet to be fully examined. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 patients older than 50 years undergoing NST or myeloablative transplantation. Seventy-one patients received nonmyeloablative conditioning, fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d × 4) and intravenous busulfan (0.8 mg/kg/d × 4); 81 patients received myeloablative conditioning, primarily cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. NST patients were more likely to have unrelated donors (58% versus 36%; P = .009), a prior transplant (25% versus 4%; P = & lt; .0001), and active disease at transplantation (85% versus 59%; P = & lt; .001). Despite the adverse characteristics, overall survival was improved in the NST group at 1 year (51% versus 39%) and 2 years (39% versus 29%; P = .056). There was no difference in progression-free survival (2 years, 27% versus 25%; P = .24). The incidence of grade 2 to 4 graft-versus-host disease was similar (28% versus 27%). The nonrelapse mortality rate was lower for NST patients (32% versus 50%; P = .01), but the relapse rate was higher (46% versus 30%; P = .052). Our experience suggests that, in patients over age 50, NST with fludarabine and low-dose busulfan leads to an overall outcome at least as good as that following myeloablative therapy. (Blood. 2005;105:1810-1814)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 835-835
    Abstract: Donor-recipient disparity at HLA-C is an important determinant of clinical outcome after myeloablative unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but its importance in URD non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is less clear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 111 patients who underwent unrelated donor NST for hematologic malignancies from 2000–2004. Of these, 78 were 10/10 matched at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1, and 33 were mismatched at one or more HLA-C antigen/allele (21 single C, 3 double C, 9 single C + other HLA locus mismatch). A majority (78%) of the mismatches at HLA-C were detectable at the antigen level. Diseases included AML (24), ALL (3), MDS (17), CML (10), CLL (23), NHL (22), and HD (12). All patients received non-myeloablative conditioning with intravenous busulfan (0.8mg/kg/d x 4 days) and fludarabine (30mg/m2/d x 4 days). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included cyclosporine plus prednisone or tacrolimus plus low-dose methotrexate based regimens. Stem cell source was primarily G-CSF mobilized PBSC. Results: Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC & gt; 500/ul) among patients who nadired was 12 days (range 8–21 days) in both groups. Median unfractionated marrow donor chimerism were ≥ 90% donor at day+30 and day +100 in both groups. There was one late graft failure in the C-mismatched cohort, and one early graft rejection in the 10/10 matched cohort. HLA-C disparity was associated with an increased risk for grade III-IV acute GVHD (33% vs. 12%, p = 0.01) in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (odds ratio 3.6, p = 0.03). This finding remained significant even when baseline differences in GVHD prophylaxis between the 2 cohorts were taken into consideration. Cumulative relapse incidence was not statistically different: 35% in the C-mismatched group, versus 55% in the 10/10 matched cohort, p = 0.09. There was a higher incidence of treatment related mortality in the C-mismatched group: 48% versus 16% (p = 0.001). Overall survival at 2 years was 27% in C-mismatched, vs. 47% in 10/10 matched patients (p = 0.009). In Cox regression model, HLA-C disparity was an independent factor for poor survival (hazard ratio 1.85, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Donor recipient disparity at HLA-C does not influence engraftment or donor chimerism after URD NST, but is associated with increased acute GVHD and inferior survival. HLA-C is an important transplantation antigen and should be considered in the selection of unrelated donors for NST.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 560-560
    Abstract: CLL remains an incurable disease with standard chemotherapy. Although recent data suggest that CLL can respond to graft vs leukemia effects, myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with a high transplant-related mortality in this population of older, heavily pretreated patients. We report the outcomes of 50 patients with advanced CLL who underwent NST between January 2001 and August 2004. All patients received fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 4 days and intravenous busulfan 0.8 mg/kg/d x 4 days. 94% received G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells while 6% received bone marrow. Graft vs host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis included tacrolimus plus low dose methotrexate (56%) or cyclosporine plus prednisone (30%) based regimens. Most patients had a HLA-matched unrelated donor (62%), 30% a HLA-matched related donor, and 8% a HLA-mismatched donor. The median age of the patients was 53 years (range 35–67), with a median time from diagnosis to NST of 6.4 years (range 0.2–14.7). The patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 5 prior therapies; 98% of patients had received fludarabine, 96% alkylating agents, 80% rituximab, and 32% alemtuzumab. 22% of patients had relapsed after prior autologous stem cell transplant. Most patients had active disease at time of NST, with only 16% in complete remission and 26% in partial remission. 52% of patients were in active relapse and 6% had failed to respond to any attempted therapy (induction failures). 50% of patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and their median time to neutrophil engraftment was 11.5 days. The incidence of grade 2–4 acute GVHD was 36%, and of chronic extensive GVHD 33%. Eleven of 25 patients (44%) in active relapse or induction failure at time of NST achieved an objective response. The median follow-up of surviving patients is 12.4 months (range 5.6 mos-4.0 yrs), with one-and two-year PFS 38% (95% CI 24–52%) and 28% (13–42%). The one- and two-year OS in this highly refractory population is 59% (95% CI 44–75%) and 48% (31–65%). Patients achieving & gt;75% donor-derived hematopoiesis 1–2 months post-NST had a 30% risk of relapse or death from disease, as compared to 72% for those with lower donor chimerism (p= 0.007). Relapse was the principal cause of treatment failure, resulting in 10 deaths; other deaths were due to infection (n = 5), GVHD (n = 3) and respiratory failure (n = 1). In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis considering pre-transplant parameters such as age, sex mismatch, disease status (CR/PR vs relapse/induction failure), donor type, aGVHD prophylactic regimen and Rai stage, only disease status was an independent risk factor for poor OS (HR 4.7, p= 0.02). Both older age and disease status (HR 2.7, p= 0.02) were associated with poor PFS. Although treatment-responsive disease was the primary predictor of outcome, nonetheless 44% of patients with refractory disease still achieved objective responses after NST. High levels of donor chimerism 1–2 months post-NST were associated with a reduced risk of relapse or death from disease. These results suggest that NST is a reasonable treatment option for patients with advanced CLL, and that strategies to augment donor chimerism early after NST may result in improved long-term outcomes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...