GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Alghamdi, Majed  (3)
  • 1
    In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 120 ( 2016-09), p. S81-S82
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0167-8140
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500707-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Canadian Urological Association Journal ; 2016
    In:  Canadian Urological Association Journal Vol. 10, No. 9-10 ( 2016-10-13), p. 314-
    In: Canadian Urological Association Journal, Canadian Urological Association Journal, Vol. 10, No. 9-10 ( 2016-10-13), p. 314-
    Abstract: Introduction: Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) can improve biochemical progression-free survival in patients with high-risk features (HRF) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Guidelines from Alberta andthe Genitourinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada (GUROC) recommend that patients with HRF be referred to radiation oncologists (RO) based on the findings from three randomized, controlled trials(RCT). Our study examines the impact of these recommendations both pre- (2005) and post- (2012) publication of RCT and GUROC guideline establishment.Methods: Patients undergoing RP during 2005 and 2012 were identified from the provincial cancer registry. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and variables of interest were linked to the registry data. RO referral patterns for each year were determined and variables influencing referral (extracapsular extension, positive margin, seminal vesicle invasion, and post-RP prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) were compared.Results: Median time to referral was 26.4 months in 2005 compared to 3.7 months 2012 (p 〈 0.001). Among patients referred post-RP, a higher proportion was referred within six months in 2012 (21%)as compared to 2005 (13%) (p=0.003). Among eligible patients in 2012, 30% were referred for discussion of aRT compared to 24% in 2005 (p=0.003). There was a marked drop in patients referredfor salvage radiation therapy beyond six months and a rise in the number of patients who are never referred.Conclusions: Despite an increase in referral rates to RO post-RP from 2005–2012, more than 50% of those patients with HRF did not receive a referral. Initiatives aimed at improving multidisciplinary care and guideline adherence should be undertaken.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1920-1214
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Canadian Urological Association Journal
    Publication Date: 2016
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Canadian Urological Association Journal ; 2016
    In:  Canadian Urological Association Journal Vol. 10, No. 11-12 ( 2016-12-15), p. 410-
    In: Canadian Urological Association Journal, Canadian Urological Association Journal, Vol. 10, No. 11-12 ( 2016-12-15), p. 410-
    Abstract: Introduction: We aimed to determine the impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on rates of radiation oncologist (RO) referral, androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), radiation therapy (RT), and radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PCa).Methods: All men 〉 18 years, diagnosed with PCa in 2005 and 2012 were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry. Patient age, aggregated clinical risk group (ACRG) score, Gleason score (GS), pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA), RO referral, and treatment received were extracted from electronic medical records. Logistic regression modelling was used to examine associations between RO referral rates and relevant factors.Results: HR-PCa was diagnosed in 261 of 1792 patients in 2005 and 435 of 2148 in 2012. Median age and ACRG scores were similar in both years (p 〉 0.05). The rate of patients with PSA 〉 20 were 67% and 57% in 2005 and 2012, respectively (p=0.004). GS ≤6 was found in 13% vs. 5% of patients, GS 7 in 27% vs. 24%, and GS ≥8 in 59% vs. 71% in 2005 and 2012, respectively (p 〈 0.001). In 2005, RO referral rate was 68% compared to 56% in 2012 (p=0.001), use of RT + ADT was 53% compared to 32% (p 〈 0.001), and RP rate was 9% vs. 17% (p=0.002). On regression analysis, older age, 2012 year of diagnosis and higher PSA were associated with decreased RO referral rates (odds ratios [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39–0.61; OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76; and OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39–0.61), respectively [p 〈 0.001]).Conclusions: Since CPG creation in 2005, RO referral rates and ADT + RT use declined and RP rates increased, which demonstrates a need to improve adherence to CPG in the HR-PCa population.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1920-1214 , 1911-6470
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Canadian Urological Association Journal
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2431403-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...