GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e13010-e13010
    Abstract: e13010 Background: Brazil has a complex health-care system which comprises 76% of population in the public unified health system (SUS) and only 24% in private system. Even with most of the population in the public system low resources has been allocated SUS by the government compared with that in private system. Breast cancer (BC) is the more frequent malignant neoplasm in Brazilian women, including HER2 overexpression, and the most are treated in SUS. Although, the HER2 blockage benefits in overall survival have been demonstrated since 2005, the adjuvant and neoadjuvant HER2 blockage was included in SUS protocols only 2013 while the metastatic only 2018. Brazil and development countries have limited accesses to biological drugs and target therapies due to the high cost. The biosimilar technology would improve the patient access to these drugs, health-care savings with efficacy and safety. In 2017, Brazil has approved the first biosimilar in oncology, the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab-dkst. Our aim is understanding the reasons that hampered the Brazilian oncologists changing practice about biosimilars. Methods: We submitted an on-line survey with 12 questions to 144 Brazilian oncologists which are registered in Brazilian Clinical Oncology Society from North, Northeast, Center east, Center west and Southeast regions in Brazil. The questions were about the anti-HER2 biosimilars knowledge, the manufacturing process, the costs, the biosimilars-based clinical trial, the drug efficacy and safety. Results: We observed that all responders have 9 years experienced oncologist with mean of care 15 patient with HER2 BC per month. In total, 95% of oncologist knows biosimilar definition and 96% assume prescribe biosimilars without doubts. However, 81% oncologists would prescribe biosimilars to all patients, 82% would interchanges and 63% would extrapolate the indication. Conclusions: This survey was conducted to understand the Brazilian oncologist knowledge about biosimilar. We demonstrated a high knowledge of biosimilar definition, however with high percentage indicated adherence barriers. The pharmacovigilance, clinical trials that support biosimilar approval and extrapolation concepts are the main aspects to be addressed. The opportunity of patient access with biosimilars is real and it is the oncologist’s duty to engage in medical education programs. This study could highlight a crucial need for greater strategies to educate physicians, to disseminate biosimilars and provide more informed decision making.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. OT2-01-05-OT2-01-05
    Abstract: Background: Treatment with anti-HER2 therapy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive Breast Cancer (BC). In Brazil, Trastuzumab was the first biosimilar approved in the treatment of patients with breast (any disease setting) and advanced gastric cancer with overexpression of HER2. Increase access to this important treatment may be enhanced with biosimilar approval. The aim of this Real-World study is to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant biosimilar trastuzumab in Brazilian patients with early HER2+ BC. Methods: This is a national, multicenter, observational prospective, real-world study in a variety of Brazilian institutions. A hundred and seventy adult patients, with diagnosis of early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, who received at least one dose of biosimilar trastuzumab (Zedora) as adjuvant therapy will be included. Patients will be followed for 5 years after the use of biosimilar trastuzumab (Zedora), unless recurrence or death. Safety outcomes will be recorded. Efficacy outcomes include invasive relapse-free survival (IRFS) rate at 18, 24, 30 and 36 months treatment initiation. Given the inexistence of a specific hypothesis to be tested, sample size was based on the accuracy of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the invasive disease relapse-free survival rate. Results: In development countries such as as Brazil, oncology treatments with biological drugs have high costs and represent an import ibarrier to patients access to anti HER2 therapy. The use of biosimilars may result in significant health care savings. Conclusions: Considering the HERITAGE study, in which biosimilarity was clearly demonstrated between the reference monoclonal antibody and the biosimilar, we do expect to find the same safety and efficacy profile. Citation Format: Leandro Alves, Débora Gagliato, Mayara de Paula, Ana Carolina Cardoso, Alexandre Alcantara, Maristela Precivale, Vivienne Castilho. A prospective real-world national study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant biosimilar trastuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-01-05.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. e13023-e13023
    Abstract: e13023 Background: Real-World Evidence (RWE) are gain importance once they are designed to evaluate the effectiveness of drugs whose efficacy has already been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. In 2017, Brazil approved the first biosimilar of trastuzumab for treatment of breast cancer (BC) with overexpression of HER2. The anti-HER2 treatment significantly improves outcome in patients with HER2-positive BC. Trastuzumab-dkst is clinically effective biosimilar and help to increase access to BC treatment. The aim of this RWE is to address the effectiveness of adjuvant biosimilar trastuzumab-dkst in Brazilian women with early HER2+ BC. Methods: This is a national, multicenter, observational, prospective, RWE study conducted in Brazilian institutions. A hundred and seventy female adult patients, with diagnosis of early stage HER2-positive BC, who received at least one dose of trastuzumab-dkst as adjuvant therapy will be included. The follow-up period will be 5 years after the first dose of trastuzumab-dkst, unless tumor recurrence or death. The safety endpoints are the occurrence adverse events. The effectiveness endpoints are invasive disease relapse-free survival rate at 18, 24, 30 and 36 months after the start of biosimilar use, the invasive disease relapse-free survival after curative-intent surgery and overall survival after curative intent surgery. Given the inexistence of a specific hypothesis to be tested, sample size was based on the accuracy of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the invasive disease relapse-free survival rate. Results: The recruitment planning covered 21 sites across the five regions of Brazil: North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, and South. From those 21 sites, 14 ( 〉 50%) have already been approved by their local ethical committee for patient recruitment. At 7 months, we have enrolled 50 patients over the five Brazilian regions, which means 29.4% of the total. Conclusions: To conduct RWE in Brazil is still challenging and we have listed 5 possible reasons: (1) there are few RWE studies running in the country, (2) we do not have trialists experienced in RWE design; (3) low medical commitment to adverse event report in RWE; (4) low budget for RWE; (5) slow ethics and regulatory process approval in Brazil. Considering the pioneering and challenges to develop the RWE in Brazil, we are achieving optimum adherence from medical sites. Moreover, roughly one quarter of the target recruitment was reached in the first 7 months after the study start date. Clinical trial information: NCT03892655 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...