GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Oxford University Press (OUP)  (2)
  • Acharya, Upasana  (2)
  • 1
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 8, No. 8 ( 2021-08-01)
    Abstract: Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) and remdesivir (REM) have been approved for investigational use to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Nepal. Methods In this prospective, multicentered study, we evaluated the safety and outcomes of treatment with CPT and/or REM in 1315 hospitalized COVID-19 patients over 18 years in 31 hospitals across Nepal. REM was administered to patients with moderate, severe, or life-threatening infection. CPT was administered to patients with severe to life-threatening infections who were at high risk for progression or clinical worsening despite REM. Clinical findings and outcomes were recorded until discharge or death. Results Patients were classified as having moderate (24.2%), severe (64%), or life-threatening (11.7%) COVID-19 infection. The majority of CPT and CPT + REM recipients had severe to life-threatening infections (CPT 98.3%; CPT + REM 92.1%) and were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU; CPT 91.8%; CPT + REM 94.6%) compared with those who received REM alone (73.3% and 57.5%, respectively). Of 1083 patients with reported outcomes, 78.4% were discharged and 21.6% died. The discharge rate was 84% for REM (n = 910), 39% for CPT (n = 59), and 54.4% for CPT + REM (n = 114) recipients. In a logistic model comparing death vs discharge and adjusted for age, gender, steroid use, and severity, the predicted margin for discharge was higher for recipients of remdesivir alone (0.82; 95% CI, 0.79–0.84) compared with CPT (0.58; 95% CI, 0.47–0.70) and CPT + REM (0.67; 95% CI, 0.60–0.74) recipients. Adverse events of remdesivir and CPT were reported in  & lt;5% of patients. Conclusions This study demonstrates a safe rollout of CPT and REM in a resource-limited setting. Remdesivir recipients had less severe infection and better outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT04570982.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: Antibiotic treatment guidelines have been increasingly recognized as an effective tool to guide appropriate prescriptions and help curtail antibiotic resistance. We aimed to assess the quality of inpatient antibiotic prescribing practices for common infections in a tertiary centre in Kathmandu. Methods We conducted a retrospective monocentric review of medical records of adult inpatients diagnosed with Urinary Tract Infection; Pneumonia; and Skin and soft tissue infection between January 2018 till December 2019. Adherence was defined as the prescription of antibiotics for mentioned infection fulfilling the correct choice, correct dose, and correct duration of therapy. Flow diagram 1 Medical Records Review to assess adherence to guideline Results Clinical records of 354 inpatients were included in the analysis. Overall, 37.9% of antibiotic prescriptions were adherent to guideline recommendations. The non-adherent groups also had a higher proportion of patients in the age group between 45 and 60 years (66%, OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.09-3.21, p=0.2) and with the presence of co-morbidities (58%, OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.26-0.75, p & lt; 0.1). The department categories, gender, number of comorbidities, infectious disease diagnosis, and history of antibiotic drug allergy had no significant effect reported on adherence. Incorrect selection (20%, or: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.79, p=0.19) and incorrect antibiotic dosage (21%, OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.08-0.82, p=0.02) were prescribed among patients diagnosed with urinary tract infection. Likewise, an incorrect dosage of antibiotics (40%, OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.07-0.97, p=0.05) was prescribed for patients with pneumonia. Pneumonia (52%) and urinary tract infection (32%, p & lt; 0.01) had more de-escalations, while the antibiotic spectrum prescribed was significantly broad (81%, p & lt; 0.001). Study Schema Conclusion Our study revealed low adherence despite the availability of the updated guideline for an antibiotic prescription. These data demand an urgent need to confront the antibiotic prescription pattern in the tertiary care centres for tailored interventions to improve adherence to guidelines, particularly focusing on prescriptions of antibiotic types and in the elderly population. It is also an imperative to reduce the broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure to the patients with acute infections guided by the culture reports. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...