GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (2)
  • S. Karger AG  (2)
  • 2020-2024  (2)
Material
  • Online Resource  (2)
Publisher
  • S. Karger AG  (2)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
  • 2020-2024  (2)
Year
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2022
    In:  Oncology Research and Treatment Vol. 45, No. 1-2 ( 2022), p. 26-36
    In: Oncology Research and Treatment, S. Karger AG, Vol. 45, No. 1-2 ( 2022), p. 26-36
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Background: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Despite the advances that have been made to improve conventional chemotherapies, their use is limited by a narrow therapeutic window based on off-target toxicities. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are composed of an antibody and a toxic payload covalently coupled by a chemical linker. They constitute an elegant means to tackle the limitations of conventional chemotherapeutics by selectively delivering a highly toxic payload directly to target cells and thereby increasing efficacy of the delivered cytotoxic but at the same time limiting systemic exposure and toxicities. As such, they appear inspired by Paul Ehrlich’s concept of a “magic bullet,” which he envisioned as drugs that go directly to their target to attack pathogens but remain harmless in healthy tissues. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Summary: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The concept of conjugating drugs to antibodies via chemical linkers is not new. As early as in the 1960s, researchers started to investigate such ADCs in animal models and first clinical trials based on mouse antibodies began in the 1980s. Although the concept appears relatively straightforward, ADCs are highly complex molecules, and it took several decades of research and development until the first ADC was approved by the FDA in 2000 and the second followed not until 11 years later. The development of an effective ADC is highly demanding, and each individual component of an ADC must be optimized: the target, the antibody, the linker, and its conjugation chemistry as well as the cytotoxic payload. Today, there are 9 approved ADCs overall and 3 for breast cancer. So, the pace of development seems to pick up with over 100 candidates in various stages of clinical development. Many ADCs of the newest generation are optimized to elicit a so-called bystander effect, to increase efficacy and tackle heterogeneous antigen expression. This approach requires a balancing of efficacy and systemic toxicity. Hence, ADCs based on their complex biology cause relevant toxicities, which are characteristic for each specific compound and may include hematologic toxicities, elevated transaminases, gastrointestinal events, and pneumonitis but also ocular toxicities as well as others many physicians may initially not be very familiar with. Management of the side effects will be key to the successful clinical use of these potent drugs. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Key Messages: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 This review focusses on the clinical experience with ADCs approved in breast cancer as well as promising candidates in late-stage clinical development. We will discuss the mode of action, biology, and composition of ADCs and how each of these crucial components influences their properties and efficacy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2296-5270 , 2296-5262
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2749752-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2021
    In:  Breast Care Vol. 16, No. 2 ( 2021), p. 115-128
    In: Breast Care, S. Karger AG, Vol. 16, No. 2 ( 2021), p. 115-128
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Background: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 CDK4/6 inhibitors have become the standard for first-line treatment of metastatic luminal breast cancer based on consistent data from several phase 3 trials demonstrating clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free as well as overall survival. In addition, they are about to become a part of adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk luminal disease based on positive results from the first randomized phase 3 trial on abemaciclib. Nevertheless, the majority of patients with advanced or metastatic luminal breast cancer and prospectively a relevant proportion of patients treated in the adjuvant setting will eventually develop resistance to this endocrine based combination within 12–36 months, depending on the line of treatment. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Potential subsequent therapies include PI3K inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, endocrine monotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and chemotherapy. However, these therapies have mainly been developed in the pre-CDK4/6 inhibitor era and little is known about potential cross-resistance. The concept of continuing CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression is supported by some preclinical data, but to date there is very limited clinical evidence to support this strategy. Therefore, treatment of metastatic luminal breast cancer after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors remains a challenge. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Key Messages: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Here we review current evidence from pro- and retrospective studies and give an outlook on future developments with respect to novel therapeutic agents, including oral SERD and AKT inhibitors, which have the potential to change the therapeutic landscape in the future. Furthermore, clinical treatment algorithms and current research will also be discussed.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1661-3791 , 1661-3805
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2205941-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...