GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (17)
  • Zhu, Qingqiang  (17)
Material
  • Online Resource  (17)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2021
    In:  Cancer Imaging Vol. 21, No. 1 ( 2021-12)
    In: Cancer Imaging, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 21, No. 1 ( 2021-12)
    Abstract: Benign and malignant renal tumors share similar some imaging findings. Methods Sixty-six patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), 13 patients with renal angiomyolipoma with minimal fat (RAMF) and 7 patients with renal oncocytoma (RO) were examined. For diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), respiratory triggered echo-planar imaging sequences were acquired in axial plane (3 b-values: 0, 500, 1000s/mm 2 ). Mean Diffusivity (MD), fractional Anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK), kurtosis anisotropy (KA) and radial kurtosis (RK) were performed. Results For MD, a significant higher value was shown in CCRCC (3.08 ± 0.23) than the rest renal tumors (2.93 ± 0.30 for RO, 1.52 ± 0.24 for AML, P   〈  0.05). The MD values were higher for RO than for AML (2.93 ± 0.30 vs.1.52 ± 0.24, P   〈  0.05), while comparable MD values were found between CCRCC and RO (3.08 ± 0.23 vs. 2.93 ± 0.30, P   〉  0.05). For MK, KA and RK, a significant higher value was shown in AML (1.32 ± 0.16, 1.42 ± 0.23, 1.41 ± 0.29) than CCRCC (0.43 ± 0.08, 0.57 ± 0.16, 0.37 ± 0.11) and RO (0.81 ± 0.08, 0.86 ± 0.16, 0.69 ± 0.08) ( P   〈  0.05). The MK, KA and RK values were higher for RO than for CCRCC (0.81 ± 0.08 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08, 0.86 ± 0.16 vs. 0.57 ± 0.16, 0.69 ± 0.08 vs. 0.37 ± 0.11, P   〈  0.05). Using MD values of 2.86 as the threshold value for differentiating CCRCC from RO and AML, the best result obtained had a sensitivity of 76.1%, specificity of 72.6%. Using MK, KA and RK values of 1.19,1.13 and 1.11 as the threshold value for differentiating AML from CCRCC and RO, the best result obtained had a sensitivity of 91.2, 86.7, 82.1%, and specificity of 86.7, 83.2, 72.8%. Conclusion DKI can be used as another noninvasive biomarker for benign and malignant renal tumors’ differential diagnosis.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-7330
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2104862-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2018
    In:  Acta Radiologica Vol. 59, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 114-120
    In: Acta Radiologica, SAGE Publications, Vol. 59, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 114-120
    Abstract: Cases of primary renal lymphoma (PRL) are quite rare and are often mistaken for renal cell carcinoma. Purpose To determine the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of PRL. Materials and Methods Twenty-three patients with PRL were identified by CT and MRI, and their tumor characteristics were assessed. Results Tumors exhibited single or multifocal nodules (n = 19) and diffuse renal enlargement (n = 4). Twenty-two tumors exhibited an infiltrative appearance. There was no evidence of calcification in any of the cases. Twenty-one tumors displaced or wrapped around abdominal vessels rather than encasing them. Enlarged retroperitoneal nodes were observed in three cases. Neither extension into the venous system nor distant metastasis was found. Tumor enhancement was of low attenuation compared with that of normal renal cortex and medulla ( P  〈  0.05). PRL was isointense on T1-weighted imaging, slightly hypointense on T2-weighted imaging and hyperintense on diffusion-weighted imaging. Twenty-two patients exhibited biopsy-confirmed PRN. There were four, 12, and seven cases of low-grade, intermediate-grade, and high-grade tumors, respectively. Patient were followed up over 16 to 166 months. Six patients died within three years and five patients died within five years. Conclusion Infiltrative appearance and tumor displacement or extension around abdominal vessels rather than vessel encasement are common findings on CT or MRI imaging and may suggest a diagnosis of PRL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0284-1851 , 1600-0455
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2024579-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2018
    In:  Acta Radiologica Vol. 59, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 121-127
    In: Acta Radiologica, SAGE Publications, Vol. 59, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. 121-127
    Abstract: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can provide a unique view of tissue perfusion without the use of exogenous contrast agents. Purpose To investigate the value of IVIM in assessing grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC). Material and Methods A total of 107 patients with pathologically proven CRCC were included, 26 with grade I, 27 with grade II, 25 with grade III, and 29 with grade IV. These tumors were divided into low (I + II) and high grades (III + IV). Nine b values (0, 30, 50, 80, 150, 300, 500, 800, and 1500 s/mm 2 ) were used in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The tissue diffusivity (D), pseudodiffusivity (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated using bi-exponential fitting of the diffusion data. Results The D values of the four groups were 1.83 ± 0.38, 1.23 ± 0.19, 1.07 ± 0.26, and 0.37 ± 0.11 × 10 –3 mm 2 /s ( P  〈  0.05). The D* values of the four groups were 0.079 ± 0.021, 0.053 ± 0.019, 0.047 ± 0.022, and 0.033 ± 0.017 ( P  〈  0.05). The f values of the four groups were 0.208 ± 0.09, 0.341 ± 0.12, 0.373 ± 0.15, and 0.461 ± 0.17 ( P  〈  0.05). Both the D and D* values correlated negatively with CRCC grading ( r = –0.677 and –0.693, P  〈  0.05). The f values correlated positively with CRCC grading (r = 0.699, P  〈  0.05). The areas of the D, D*, and f values under the ROC curves to diagnose low and high CRCC grades were 0.934, 0.837, and 0.793, respectively. The cutoff values of D, D*, and f were 1.13, 0.056, and 0.376, respectively; the diagnostic performance for low and high CRCC grading had a sensitivity of 82.0%, 80.7%, and 83.2% and a specificity of 90.8%, 86.3%, and 82.6%. Conclusion IVIM may provide information for differentiating CRCC grades.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0284-1851 , 1600-0455
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2024579-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: European Journal of Radiology, Elsevier BV, ( 2012-11)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0720-048X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005350-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: The British Journal of Radiology, British Institute of Radiology, Vol. 96, No. 1150 ( 2023-10)
    Abstract: To quantitatively compare the diagnostic values of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) analysis of microstructural differences for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC). Methods: A total of 108 patients with pathologically confirmed CRCC, including 38 Grade I, 37 Grade II, 18 Grade III and 15 Grade IV, were enrolled and divided into groups according to tumor grade [low grade (Ⅰ+Ⅱ, n = 75) and high grade (Ⅲ+Ⅳ, n = 33)]. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK), kurtosis anisotropy (KA) and radial kurtosis (RK) were performed. Results: Both the ADC (r = −0.803) and MD (−0.867) values showed a negative correlation with tumor grading (p 〈 0.05) and MK (r = 0.812), KA (0.816) and RK (0.853) values a positive correlation with tumor grading (p 〈 0.05). Mean FA values showed no significant differences among CRCC grades (p 〉 0.05). ROC curve analyses showed that MD values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating low/high and Ⅱ/Ⅲ tumor grading. MD values gave AUC: 0.937 (0.896); sensitivity: 92.0% (86.5%); specificity: 78.8% (77.8%) and accuracy: 90.7% (87.3%). ADC performed worse than MD, MK, KA or RK (all p 〈 0.05) during pair-wise comparisons of ROC curves to show diagnostic efficacy. Conclusion: DKI analysis performs better than ADC in differentiating CRCC grading. Advances in knowledge: Both the ADC and MD values correlated negatively with CRCC grading. The MK, KA and RK values correlated positively with CRCC grading. MD values had the highest diagnostic efficacy in differentiating low/high and Ⅱ/Ⅲ CRCC grading.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1285 , 1748-880X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Institute of Radiology
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468548-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2014
    In:  Acta Radiologica Vol. 55, No. 2 ( 2014-03), p. 231-238
    In: Acta Radiologica, SAGE Publications, Vol. 55, No. 2 ( 2014-03), p. 231-238
    Abstract: Patients with metanephric adenoma have a good prognosis after undergoing total nephrectomy or local resection with kidney preservation. Accurate diagnosing is important for guiding clinical treatment. Only few previous case reports have been found focusing on the imaging findings of metanephric adenoma. Purpose To evaluate the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging characteristics of metanephric adenoma. Material and Methods The imaging findings in eight patients with metanephric adenoma were studied retrospectively. MSCT was undertaken to investigate tumor location, size, attenuation, cystic or solid appearance, calcification, capsule sign, and enhancement pattern. Results Tumors (mean diameter, 3.3 ± 1.0 cm) were solitary (8/8), solid (7/8) with cystic components (2/8), no calcifications (7/8), had a poorly-defined margin (8/8), were centered in the renal medulla (7/8), compressed the renal pelvis (3/8), and none had retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. The attenuation of metanephric adenoma tumors was less or equal compared to the renal cortex or medulla on unenhanced CT (30.6 ± 2.6 vs. 36.3 ± 4.6 vs. 33.2 ± 3.9, P  〉  0.05), while tumor enhancement after administration of an contrast agent was lower than that of normal renal cortex and medulla during all phases ( P  〈  0.05). Conclusion Metanephric adenoma tends to be a solitary, poorly defined margin, isodense or hypodense mass arising from the renal medulla with enhancement less than the cortex and medulla during all phases.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0284-1851 , 1600-0455
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2024579-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2015
    In:  World Journal of Surgical Oncology Vol. 13, No. 1 ( 2015-12)
    In: World Journal of Surgical Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 13, No. 1 ( 2015-12)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1477-7819
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2118383-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    British Institute of Radiology ; 2021
    In:  The British Journal of Radiology Vol. 94, No. 1122 ( 2021-06-01), p. 20201374-
    In: The British Journal of Radiology, British Institute of Radiology, Vol. 94, No. 1122 ( 2021-06-01), p. 20201374-
    Abstract: To explore the feasibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating different types of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: 36 patients with clear cell RCC (CCRCC, low-grade,n = 20 and high-grade, n = 16), 19 with papillary RCC, 11 with chromophobe RCC, and 9 with collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) were examined with DKI technique. b values of 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm 2 were adopted. The DKI parameters, i.e., mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK), kurtosis anisotropy (KA), radial kurtosis (RK) and signa-to-noise ration (SNR) of DKI images at different b values were used. Results: The mean SNRs of DKI images at b = 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm 2 were 32.8, 14.2 and 9.18, respectively. For MD parameter, a significant higher value was shown in CCRCC than those of papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC and CDC (p 〈 0.05). In addition, both chromophobe RCC and CDC have larger MD values than papillary RCC (p 〈 0.05), however, there was no significant differences between chromophobe RCC and CDC (p 〉 0.05). For MK, KA and RK parameters, a significant higher value was shown in papillary RCC than those of CCRCC, chromophobe RCC and CDC (p 〈 0.05). Moreover, both chromophobe RCC and CDC have significantly larger values of MK, KA and RK than CCRCC (p 〈 0.05). Conclusion: Our preliminary study demonstrated significant differences in the DKI parameters between the subtypes of RCCs, given an adequate SNR of DKI images. Advances in knowledge: 1.The MD value is the best parameter to distinguish CCRCC from other RCCs. 2.The MK, KA and RK values are the best parameters to distinguish papillary RCC from other RCCs. 3.DKI is able to provide images with sufficient SNRs in kidney disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1285 , 1748-880X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Institute of Radiology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468548-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    British Institute of Radiology ; 2016
    In:  The British Journal of Radiology Vol. 89, No. 1063 ( 2016-07), p. 20151068-
    In: The British Journal of Radiology, British Institute of Radiology, Vol. 89, No. 1063 ( 2016-07), p. 20151068-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1285 , 1748-880X
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Institute of Radiology
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468548-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2019
    In:  Acta Radiologica Vol. 60, No. 3 ( 2019-03), p. 382-387
    In: Acta Radiologica, SAGE Publications, Vol. 60, No. 3 ( 2019-03), p. 382-387
    Abstract: Few studies have reported on the use of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for renal tumors. Purpose To investigate the value of IVIM for distinguishing renal tumors. Material and Methods Thirty-one patients with clear cell renal cell carcinomas (CCRCCs), 13 patients with renal angiomyolipomas with minimal fat (RAMFs), eight patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (ChRCCs), and ten patients with papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs) were examined. The tissue diffusivity (D), pseudodiffusivity (D*), and perfusion fraction (f) were calculated. Results The D and f values were highest for CCRCCs, lowest for PRCCs, and intermediate for ChRCCs and RAMFs ( P  〈  0.05). The D values of CCRCCs differed significantly from those of ChRCCs and PRCCs ( P  〈  0.05). The D* values were highest for RAMFs, lowest for ChRCCs, and intermediate for CCRCCs and PRCCs ( P  〈  0.05). Statistically significant differences were observed between the D* values of CCRCCs and RAMFs ( P  〈  0.05). The D* values of the CCRCCs differed significantly from the D* values of the ChRCCs ( P  〈  0.05). Using the D and f values of 1.10 and 0.41, respectively, as the threshold values for differentiating CCRCCs from RAMFs, ChRCCs, and PRCCs, the best results had sensitivities of 81.0% and 66.8% and specificities of 85.7% and 81.0%, respectively. Using the D* value of 0.038 as the threshold value for differentiating RAMFs from CCRCCs, ChRCCs, and PRCCs, the best result obtained had a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 76.2%. Conclusion IVIM may provide information for differentiating renal tumor types.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0284-1851 , 1600-0455
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2024579-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...