GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (6)
  • Wang, Shusen  (6)
  • Medicine  (6)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 29 ( 2019-10-10), p. 2610-2619
    Abstract: Pyrotinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor, showed promising antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in a phase I trial. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of pyrotinib versus lapatinib, both in combination with capecitabine, in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chinese patients with HER2-positive relapsed or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab were assigned (1:1) to receive 400 mg pyrotinib or lapatinib 1,250 mg orally once per day for 21-day cycles in combination with capecitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 orally twice per day on days 1 to 14). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. RESULTS Between May 29, 2015, and March 15, 2016, 128 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the pyrotinib (n = 65) or lapatinib (n = 63) treatment groups. The overall response rate was 78.5% (95% CI, 68.5% to 88.5%) with pyrotinib and 57.1% (95% CI, 44.9% to 69.4%) with lapatinib (treatment difference, 21.3%; 95% CI, 4.0% to 38.7%; P = .01). The median progression-free survival was 18.1 months (95% CI, 13.9 months to not reached) with pyrotinib and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.8 months) with lapatinib (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.58; P 〈 .001). The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome in 16 of 65 patients (24.6%) in the pyrotinib group versus 13 of 63 (20.6%) in the lapatinib group; diarrhea in 10 patients (15.4%) versus three patients (4.8%), respectively; and decreased neutrophil count in six patients (9.2%) versus two patients (3.2%), respectively. CONCLUSION In women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes, anthracyclines, and/or trastuzumab, pyrotinib plus capecitabine yielded statistically significant better overall response rate and progression-free survival than lapatinib plus capecitabine in this randomized phase II trial.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. e13056-e13056
    Abstract: e13056 Background: For patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negeative metastatic breast cancer (HR+HER2-MBC), switching to another cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) or target drug with different mechanism are reasonable treatment strategies post-CDK4/6i. However, no clinical data has been reported on which of the two strategies is more effective. We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy of abemaciclib-based therapy versus tucidinostat-based therapy after progression on palbociclib. Methods: We identified patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who received abemaciclib-based therapy or tucidinostat-based therapy after progression on palbociclib from seven research centers in China. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), PFS in patients with PIK3CA-mutant and PIK3CA wild-type, and safety. Results: Between Apr 1 st 2020 and September 30 th 2022, a total of 149 patients were included, of whom 73 patients received abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy(ET), and 76 patients received tucidinostat plus ET. The majority of patients had visceral disease (124/149, 83.2%) and ≥3 metastatic sites (76/149, 51.0%) at baseline, one third of patients (48/149, 32.2%) had previously been treated ≥3 lines of endocrine therapy in MBC setting. More patients received sequential therapy after palbociclib in abemaciclib group(49.3%) than that in tucidinostat group(30.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in other baseline characteristics between the two groups. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 38.4% (28/73) in abemaciclib group and 17.1% (13/76) in ET plus tucidinostat group (p=0.0037). There was significant difference in PFS between abemaciclib group and tucidinostat group in both the whole population (5.0 months vs. 2.0 months; HR 0.44; 95%CI 0.31-0.64; P<0.001) and propensity score matched population. PIK3CA mutations occurred in 44.20% of patients who had undergone multigene sequencing. PIK3CA-mutant showed a negative effect on PFS of abemaciclib-based therapy. The most common any grade and grade 3-4 adverse events was neutropenia in either group. Common non-hematological toxicity occurred in abemaciclib group was diarrhea, and were increased AST, nausea, vomiting in tucidinostat group. Conclusions: Abemaciclib-based therapy improved clinical benefit rate and prolonged PFS compared with tucidinostat-based therapy, providing a superior treatment option in patients progressed on palbociclib.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1102-1102
    Abstract: 1102 Background: MRG002 is a novel HER2-targeted ADC, composed of a sugar-modified trastuzumab, MMAE payload and a cleavable vc-linker. MRG002 was effective in HER2-low expressing breast cancer in preclinical studies. Hence, we conducted the phase II study to evaluate the safety and anti-tumor efficacy of MRG002 in HER-low breast cancer. Methods: HER2 low tumor expression was determined by a central lab and had to be immunohistochemistry (IHC)1+ or 2+/ISH-. Eligible patients had advanced/metastatic HER2-low expressing breast cancer that failed standard therapies. MRG002 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks at the dose of 2.6 mg/kg, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity which ever occurred first. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee (IRC). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: A total of 56 female patients with HER2-low advanced or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled at the time of data cut-off (Dec 31, 2021) and had received at least one cycle of MRG002. The median age was 55 (30-72) years. Most patients were HER2 IHC1+ (83.9%), hormone receptor positive (HR+) (85.7%), and with a ECOG PS of 1 (57.1%). Twenty-eight patients (50.0%) had received at least 2 lines of chemotherapy and the median treatment was 3. Forty-one patients (73.2%) had visceral metastasis and 31 patients (55.4%) had bone metastasis. The ORR and DCR in 49 evaluable patients were 34.7% and 75.5%, with 17 PR, 20 SD and 12 PD. Subgroup analysis indicated that the ORR was 39.5% (15/38) and DCR was 76.3% (29/38) among the evaluable patients with visceral metastasis. The tumor responses were similar in both the HER2 IHC 1+ and IHC 2+ subgroups, as is 34.1% and 37.5% respectively, which might be attributed to fewer IHC 2+ enrollment in this trial. Although only 8 HR- subjects enrolled in our study, the ORR (37.5%) and DCR (62.5%) is promising in these triple negative BC patients post to ≥2 line therapies. Most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1 or 2. The most common TRAEs (≥20%) were neutrophil count decreased (53.6%), white blood cell count decreased (48.2%), AST increased (46.4%), alopecia and ALT increased (39.3%), blood lactate dehydrogenase increased(33.9%), GGT increased (32.1%), nausea (32.1%), vomiting (23.2%), constipation (23.2%), diarrhea(23.2%) and hyperglycemia (21.4%). Most common grade ≥3 TRAE(≥10%) was neutrophil count decreased(14.3%). No patients died due to MRG002. Conclusions: MRG002 shows promising efficacyand well tolerated in patients with HER2-low breast cancer. Further evaluation is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT04742153.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P5-18-10-P5-18-10
    Abstract: Background: A dose relationship may exist for both antitumor activity and toxicity of docetaxel in breast cancer (BC) patients, while 86% grade 4 neutropenia and 12% febrile neutropenia (FN) were reported when pretreated advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients received 100 mg/m2 docetaxel monotherapy without hematopoietic support. PHEDRA was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of adding pyrotinib to trastuzumab and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in women with HER2+ early or locally ABC (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03588091). We conducted this exploratory analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of mecapegfilgrastim, a long-acting recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF), as primary prophylaxis for neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in BC patients. Methods: Patients with HER2-positive early or locally ABC were randomly assigned (1:1) to pyrotinib arm receiving 4 neoadjuvant cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m2 iv d1 q3w), trastuzumab (8 mg/kg iv, cycle 1 d1, then 6 mg/kg d1 q3w), and pyrotinib (400 mg po qd, d1-21, q3w) or placebo arm with placebo, trastuzumab and docetaxel. Per protocol, patients were required to receive a single, 6-mg fixed dose of mecapegfilgrastim on Day 2 of each cycle. Other G-CSF was permitted if mecapegfilgrastim was unavailable at the local center or patients occurred mecapegfilgrastim intolerance. The incidence of neutropenia, FN, time to first neutropenia onset, duration per neutropenia event and cumulative neutropenia duration during neoadjuvant treatment period; and the incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia, FN and decreased WBC count in Cycle 1 to 4 (C1-4) were presented. The data cutoff date was April 30, 2021. Results: Between July 23, 2018 and January 8, 2021, 355 patients were randomized (pyrotinib arm, n=178; placebo arm, n=177). Among them, 291 (82.0%) patients received a single, 6-mg fixed dose of mecapegfilgrastim in Cycle 1 and 270 (76.1%) patients received mecapegfilgrastim in each of the 4 cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 33 (18.5%) patients in the pyrotinib arm and 36 (20.3%) patients in the placebo arm. Five (2.8%) patients in the pyrotinib arm and 2 (1.1%) patients in the placebo arm developed FN (5 FN occurred in C1; 2 FN occurred in C2). Median duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 3 days in the pyrotinib group and 3 days in the placebo group. Median cumulative duration of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 4 days and 3 days in the pyrotinib group and the placebo group, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia mainly occurred during the first cycle of treatment for both pyrotinib (13.5%) and placebo arm (15.8%), reduced in the second cycle (5.9% vs 4.0%) and thereafter (C3: 1.8% vs 3.4%; C4: 2.4% vs 1.7%). Similar trends were observed for grade 3/4 WBC count decreased in Cycle 1 to 4. No grade 4 infection occurred. Overview of neutropenia, FN and WBC count decreased was summarized in Table 1. Consistent findings were observed in 291 mecapegfilgrastim treated patients. Conclusion: The exploratory analysis demonstrated 6-mg fixed dose of mecapegfilgrastim was effective when administrated as primary prophylaxis for neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, which could be considered as a new treatment option for its advantage of once-per-cycle dosing and convenient dose management. Table 1.Overview of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and WBC count decrease during neoadjuvant treatment period.Docetaxel+Trastuzumab+Pyrotinib(N=178)Docetaxel+Trastuzumab+Placebo (N=177)All randomized patients(N=355)Neutropenia, n (%)Any grade57 (32.0)54 (30.5)111 (31.3)Grade 16 (3.4)5 (2.8)11 (3.1)Grade 218 (10.1)13 (7.3)31 (8.7)Grade 315 (8.4)20 (11.3)35 (9.9)Grade 418 (10.1)16 (9.0)34 (9.6)Median time to first onset (IQR), days7 (6-63)6 (6-49)7 (6-53)Median duration per grade 3 or higher neutropenia, days (range)3 (1-16)3 (2-12)3 (1-16)Median cumulative duration of grade 3 or higher neutropenia, days (range)4 (2-16)3 (2-14)3 (2-16)FN, n (%)5 (2.8)2 (1.1)7 (2.0)Grade 3 or higher neutropenia, n (%) *Cycle 124 (13.5)28 (15.8)52 (14.6)Cycle 210 (5.9)7 (4.0)17 (4.9)Cycle 33 (1.8)6 (3.4)9 (2.6)Cycle 44 (2.4)3 (1.7)7 (2.1)Grade 3 or higher FN, n (%) *Cycle 12 (1.1)2 (1.1)4 (1.1)Cycle 22 (1.2)02 (0.6)Cycle 3000Cycle 4000Grade 3 or higher WBC count decreased, n (%) *Cycle 120 (11.2)20 (11.3)40 (11.3)Cycle 28 (4.7)2 (1.1)10 (2.9)Cycle 32 (1.2)1 (0.6)3 (0.9)Cycle 44 (2.4)2 (1.1)6 (1.8)Note: IQR, interquartile range; FN, febrile neutropenia; WBC, white blood cell.*The denominator indicates number of patients with mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis use in this cycle. Citation Format: Min He, Benlong Yang, Jiong Wu, Zhenzhen Liu, Hongjian Yang, Jinhai Tang, Kun Wang, Yunjiang Liu, Haibo Wang, Peifen Fu, Shuqun Zhang, Qiang Liu, Zefei Jiang, Shusen Wang, Jian Huang, Chuan Wang, Shu Wang, Yongsheng Wang, Linlin Zhen, Xiaoyu Zhu, Shulin Liu, Ping Yan, Jianjun Zou. Mecapegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of neutropenia in 355 HER2+ breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel in combination with trastuzumab and/or pyrotinib: Exploratory analysis from randomized, double-blind, phase 3 PHEDRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-10.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. PD8-08-PD8-08
    Abstract: Background: Pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) plus capecitabine have shown clinically and statistically meaningful progression free survival and overall survival benefits and acceptable tolerability in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in phase 3 study. We compared the efficacy and safety of adding pyrotinib to trastuzumab and docetaxel vs placebo, trastuzumab and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in women with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer (ABC) in this randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study. Methods: Treatment naive patients with HER2-positive early or locally ABC (T2-3, N0-3, M0) were randomly assigned (1:1) to pyrotinib arm receiving 4 neoadjuvant cycles of pyrotinib (400 mg po qd, d1-21, q3w), trastuzumab (8 mg/kg iv, cycle 1 d1, then 6 mg/kg d1 q3w) and placebo arm with docetaxel (100 mg/m2 iv d1, q3w) or placebo, trastuzumab and docetaxel. Randomization was done via a centralized interactive web-response system and stratified by primary tumor size ( & gt;2 cm and ≤5cm, or & gt;5cm) and hormone receptor status (ER positive and/or PR positive, or negative for both). After surgery, patients received 3 cycles of intravenous fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide followed by anti-cancer treatment (anti-HER2 therapy, radiotherapy, or endocrine therapy) at physicians’ discretion in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was total pCR rate (tpCR; defined as absence of any residual invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes [ypT0/is, ypN0] ), assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03588091. The data cutoff date was April 30, 2021. Results: Between July 23, 2018 and January 8, 2021, a total of 355 patients were randomized (pyrotinib arm, n=178; and placebo arm, n=177; mean [SD] age, 48.8 [9.4] years). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced. In the full analysis set, IRC-assessed tpCR rates were 41.0% (73 of 178) in the pyrotinib arm and 22.0% (39 of 177) in the placebo arm (difference, 19.0% [95% CI, 9.5%-28.4%]; one-sided P & lt;0.0001). The local pathologist-assessed tpCR rates were 44.4% (79 of 178) and 24.3% (43 of 177) in the pyrotinib arm and the placebo arm, respectively. Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was 71.3% (127 of 178) in the pyrotinib arm and 37.3% (66 of 177) in the placebo arm. Of the most-common grade ≥3 AEs (≥5% of patients in either arm), the incidences of diarrhea (79 of 178 [44.4%] vs 9 of 177 [5.1%] ), decreased WBC count (29 of 178 [16.3%] vs 24 of 177 [13.6%] ), vomiting (23 of 178 [12.9%] vs 2 of 177 [1.1%] ), anemia (11 of 178 [6.2%] vs 2 of 177 [1.1%] ), and hypokalemia (9 of 178 [5.1%] vs 0) were higher in the pyrotinib arm compared with the placebo arm. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred mainly during the first treatment cycle and decreased in the second cycle and thereafter. No grade 4 or 5 diarrheas occurred. The median duration per grade 3 episode was 2.0 days and median cumulative duration of grade 3 episodes was 4.0 days. Only 1 patient (1 of 178 [0.6%] ) in the pyrotinb arm experienced diarrhea-related discontinuation. Serious AEs were reported in 14.6% of patients (26 of 178) in the pyrotinib arm and 6.8% of patients (12 of 177) in the placebo arm. Conclusions: Pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in IRC-assessed tpCR rate for patients with HER2-positive early or locally ABC compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel, with an acceptable and manageable safety profile. These findings support pyrotinib, trastuzumab, and docetaxel as a new neoadjuvant treatment option in this patient population. Citation Format: Jiong Wu, Zhenzhen Liu, Hongjian Yang, Jinhai Tang, Kun Wang, Yunjiang Liu, Haibo Wang, Peifen Fu, Shuqun Zhang, Qiang Liu, Zefei Jiang, Shusen Wang, Jian Huang, Chuan Wang, Shu Wang, Yongsheng Wang, Linlin Zhen, Xiaoyu Zhu, Fei Wu, Tao Zhang, Jianjun Zou. Pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer (PHEDRA): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-08.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P5-18-06-P5-18-06
    Abstract: Background: Diarrhea is a common side effect of many anti-cancer treatments, including chemotherapeutic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and pelvic radiotherapy. PHEDRA was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of adding pyrotinib (an irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) to trastuzumab and docetaxel (pyrotinib arm) vs placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel (placebo arm) as neoadjuvant treatment in women with HER2+ early or locally advanced breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03588091). We conducted this exploratory analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of proactive diarrhea management (PDM) according to the recommendation from independent data monitoring committee. Methods: Between July 23, 2018 and January 8, 2021, 355 patients were enrolled and randomized, of whom 212 and 143 patients were randomized before and after the implementation of PDM strategy. The diarrhea management strategy was strengthened with the early identification and proactive management of diarrhea, including use of loperamide as first choice of antidiarrheal agents and strict application of loperamide recommended dose (4 mg initially and an additional 2 mg following each diarrhea stool, not exceeding 16 mg/day). Primary prophylaxis with loperamide was not allowed. The incidence, severity, onset, and duration of diarrhea were summarized. The data cutoff date was April 30, 2021. Results: Of all 178 patients with pyrotinib arm, there were 43 (40.6%) and 56 (77.8%) patients applied loperamide as the first choice of antidiarrheal agents before and after the PDM implementation, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 diarrhea has decreased from 50.0% before the PDM implementation to 36.1% after the PDM implementation (Table 1). During neoadjuvant treatment period, grade 3 diarrhea mainly occurred during the first cycle of treatment for both treatment arms (C1: 20.8%), showing a sharp decreased trend during the following cycles (C2: 8.7%; C3: 5.4%; C4: 4.5%). Furthermore, among patients with pyrotinib arm, the incidences of grade 3 diarrhea in the first, second cycle and thereafter were lower in patients enrolled after the implementation of PDM than those enrolled before the PDM implementation (C1: 29.2%. vs 44.3%; C2: 10.1% vs 21.8%; C3: 7.2% vs 14.1%; C4: 4.5% vs 11.1%). Among patients with pyrotinib, compared with those enrolled before the PDM implementation, the median duration per diarrhea episode (4 days [IQR, 2-9] vs 2 days [1-5] ), median duration per grade 3 diarrhea episode (2 days [IQR, 2-3] vs 2 days [1-2] ), and median cumulative duration of grade 3 diarrhea (6 days [IQR, 3-9] vs 2 [2-5] days) were shortened in those enrolled after the PDM implementation. During neoadjuvant treatment period, 31 (17.4%) patients experienced diarrhea leading to pyrotinib dose reduction, and only 1 (0.6%) patient discontinued study treatment due to diarrhea in the pyrotinib arm. Conclusion: Pyrotinib tolerability was improved with PDM, which reduced the incidence and duration of grade 3 diarrhea. Grade 3 diarrhoea occurred mainly during the first cycle of treatment and reduced in the second cycle and thereafter. Diarrhea in the pyrotinib group was characterized by early onset and short duration and was generally manageable. Table 1.Characteristics of treatment-emergent diarrheaBEFORE the implementation of PDMAFTER the implementation of PDMPyrotinib+Trastuzumab+Docetaxel(N=106)Placebo+Trastuzumab+Docetaxel(N=106)Pyrotinib+Trastuzumab+Docetaxel(N=72)Placebo+Trastuzumab+Docetaxel(N=71)Diarrhea incidence, n (%)All grade106 (100.0)57 (53.8)72 (100.0)36 (50.7)Grade 112 (11.3)32 (30.2)7 (9.7)28 (39.4)Grade 241 (38.7)18 (17.0)39 (54.2)6 (8.5)Grade 353 (50.0)7 (6.6)26 (36.1)2 (2.8)Cycle 147 (44.3)4 (3.8)21 (29.2)2 (2.8)Cycle 222 (21.8)2 (1.9)7 (10.1)0Cycle 314 (14.1)05 (7.2)0Cycle 411 (11.1)2 (1.9)3 (4.5)0Grade 4 or 50000Median time to the first onset, days (IQR)All grade4 (2 to 5)7 (4 to 28)3 (2 to 4)6 (5 to 12)Grade 39 (5 to 11)16 (7 to 24)9 (6 to 12)11 (6 to 16)Median duration per diarrhea episode, days (IQR)All grade4 (2 to 9)2 (2 to 4)2 (1 to 5)2 (1 to 3)Grade 32 (2 to 3)2 (2 to 2)2 (1 to 2)1 (1 to 1)Median cumulative duration, days (IQR)Grade 36 (3 to 9)2 (2 to 3)2 (2 to 5)1 (1 to 1)Median time since the first onset to recovery, days (IQR)All grade7 (3 to 12)2 (2 to 4)3 (1 to 10)2 (1 to 4)Note: PDM, proactive diarrhea management; IQR, interquartile range. Citation Format: Benlong Yang, Jiong Wu, Zhenzhen Liu, Hongjian Yang, Jinhai Tang, Kun Wang, Yunjiang Liu, Haibo Wang, Peifen Fu, Shuqun Zhang, Qiang Liu, Zefei Jiang, Shusen Wang, Jian Huang, Chuan Wang, Shu Wang, Yongsheng Wang, Linlin Zhen, Fei Wu, Shulin Liu, Xiang Lin, Jianjun Zou. Proactive diarrhea management improved tolerability of pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel in patients with HER2+ early or locally advanced breast cancer: Exploratory analysis from randomized, double-blind, phase 3 PHEDRA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-06.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...