GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (9)
  • Samarasinghe, Sujith  (9)
  • Medicine  (9)
Material
  • Online Resource  (9)
Language
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • Medicine  (9)
RVK
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 1743-1743
    Abstract: Introduction: Immunotherapies like Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), Blinatumomab and Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) have revolutionized outcomes in patients with Relapse/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (R/R ALL) with event free survival (EFS) of 50% at 1 year (Maude et al. 2018). Optimal phasing of these agents has not been clearly defined and depends on antigen expression on blasts, CNS status, T cell number and prior disease response. InO, a CD22 targeting antibody-drug conjugate has proven efficacy in adults (Kantarjian et al., 2016) and children as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) with a favourable toxicity profile (Brivio et al. 2021). However, outcomes following the use of InO prior to CAR-T therapy are still not established. This study provides a retrospective analysis of children and young adults who received InO as part of pre-CAR-T management (before leucapheresis or as bridging therapy to CAR-T infusion). Methods: Patients aged 0-25years with R/R ALL were eligible for the study if they received InO pre-CAR-T therapy. Retrospective data collection was performed using a standardised form from CAR-T centres in the UK. Response to CAR-T therapy and/or relapse was evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 12 months or at last follow-up. Results were compared to a control cohort of R/R ALL patients treated with tisagenlecleucel but without preceding InO, over a contemporaneous period, at the largest paediatric CAR-T centre in the UK. Results: Fourteen patients from 5 paediatric and young adult centres in the UK received InO after screening for CAR-T therapy. InO was used pre-leucapheresis, as bridging and for both in 2, 11 and 1 respectively. Two were excluded from outcome analysis (1 adolescent with Trisomy 21 and transfusion induced hepatic siderosis died due to VOD while awaiting CAR-T production and 1 failed CAR-T manufacture despite achieving an adequate T cell harvest as per manufacturer guidance). Twelve (85%) patients were able to receive CAR-T infusion at a median of 1 month (range 0.7-5.6 months) from first InO dose. InO was well tolerated with 21% developing febrile neutropenia and grade 4 cytopenias. Use of InO pre-leucapheresis led to successful manufacture of CAR-T cells in 2/3 (66%). InO group was compared with 27 children who received CAR-T without preceding InO over the same time period. Table 1 summarises patient and CAR-T characteristics of the two groups which were comparable. Median follow-up of the InO and non-InO groups was 10 months (range 2.8- 30.1 months). In the InO group(n=12), 3 (25%) remained leukemia free at last follow up. Nine patients (75%) relapsed. All relapses occurred within 6 months from CAR-T infusion. Seven (58%) of those who relapsed died at a median of 7.8 months post CAR-T infusion and 2 (16.6%) were salvaged with further therapy. Subsequent therapy (alternate CAR-T and/or allo-SCT) was carried out in 4/12 (33%) patients in the InO group and in 5/27 (18.5%) in the non-InO group (p= 0.2). EFS was significantly higher in the non-InO group (53% vs 12%, p=0.0009), as was OS (86% vs 13%, p=0.004) (Figure 1). Conclusion: This study provides a direct comparison between two contemporaneously treated cohorts with R/R ALL receiving CAR-T therapy. InO prior to CAR T cell therapy was well tolerated despite the cohort being heavily pre-treated except for one patient who developed fatal VOD prior to CAR T cell infusion. InO was given for disease debulking, rather than to achieve MRD negativity and hence majority of the cohort (75%) received only 1 dose of InO in bridging rather than the usual schedule of three doses weekly per cycle. Outcomes for the non-InO group were comparable to those treated on the ELIANA study but the OS of the InO group was significantly lower (13% vs 86% p= 0.004). Potential reasons include an impact of InO on function of CAR-T cells in vivo or a deleterious effect of InO on the B cell compartment such that CAR-T cells prove less effective. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, it is possible there was an inherent bias to use InO in patients with more resistant disease, although the very comparable pre CAR-T bone marrow disease burden in each group suggests this was not the case. The small size of the cohorts may also have exaggerated differences in outcome. Ultimately, randomised controlled studies of InO pre-CAR-T are required before firm conclusions about its impact on outcomes post CAR-T therapy can be ascertained. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sharplin: Kite Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: Travel Support. Nicholson: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: Conference fees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Conference fees; Pfizer: Consultancy. Amrolia: ADC Therapeutics: Other: Named inventor on a patent which is being transferred to ADCT.; Autolus: Patents & Royalties. Ghorashian: Novartis: Honoraria; UCLB: Patents & Royalties.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: The Lancet, Elsevier BV, Vol. 396, No. 10266 ( 2020-12), p. 1885-1894
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0140-6736
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2067452-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3306-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1476593-7
    SSG: 5,21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 135, No. 17 ( 2020-04-23), p. 1501-1504
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 132, No. Supplement 1 ( 2018-11-29), p. 5201-5201
    Abstract: Introduction: A recent phase I/II study of blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL), found 39-51% achieved complete, often MRD negative, remission after two cycles of therapy. Higher responses were observed in patients with less than 50% bone marrow blasts, compared to greater than 50% (55.6% vs 32.7% (95% CI 30.8-78.5 and 20.3-47.1 respectively)1. Furthermore, an adult study showed complete minimal residual disease (MRD) response rates of 78% when blinatumomab was used to treat MRD-positive ALL in haematological remission 2. Hence response rates (and toxicity) to blinatumomab are highly correlated with pre-treatment disease burden. We present preliminary data showing an excellent response to blinatumomab in children and young adults with resistant B-ALL who had persistent MRD, or after debulking chemotherapy to achieve a partial remission. Methods: Eleven patients were identified through a national survey. The mean age of patients was 10 years (range 0.7-22 years, 3 infants and 1 Down syndrome ALL). All patients had B-lineage ALL which was CD19 positive. None had active CNS disease at the point of receiving blinatumomab. Prior to administration of blinatumomab, all patients either had persistent MRD following several courses of intensive chemotherapy or received debulking chemotherapy for heavier marrow infiltrates. Pre-blinatumomab chemotherapy to which the patients had failed to obtain an adequate MRD response included UKALL 2011 Regimens A or C, UKALL R3, Interfant 06 or NOPHO high risk blocks. Patients received 5-15 µg/m2 of blinatumomab for 1-2 cycles prior to definitive therapy. Results: Pre-blinatumomab, all patients except one were in morphological remission with MRD measurable by PCR (0.003-1%), the remaining patient had 9% marrow disease by morphology. After 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab all patients had negative MRD when measured by flow cytometry and/or by PCR, giving a 100% response rate. This was followed by Haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in nine patients and the remaining two are awaiting transplant. Further data on patient characteristics, CNS status, relapse and survival outcome are being collected and will be presented at the meeting. Minimal toxicity was observed; of the seven patients in whom toxicity data were available, three had grade 1 CRS, which resolved spontaneously without interruption of therapy or treatment with corticosteroids or Tocilizumab. One patient reported grade 1 neurotoxicity. This preliminary UK experience demonstrates that excellent MRD response is observed with minimal toxicity in children and young adults who receive blinatumomab for persistent MRD or after debulking chemotherapy. This provided a bridge to transplant in patients who would otherwise not have benefited from the procedure because of persistent MRD. We are planning to extend these observations by undertaking a study of this strategy in first high-risk B-ALL relapse. Stackelberg Av, Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, et al. Phase I/Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(36):4381-4389. Gokbuget N, Dombret H, Bonifacio M, et al. Blinatumomab for minimal residual disease in adults with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2018;131(14):1522-1531. Disclosures Ghorashian: Celgene: Other: travel support; Novartis: Honoraria. Marks:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Vora:Amgen: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Jazz: Other: Advisory board; Medac: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 130, No. Suppl_1 ( 2017-12-07), p. 806-806
    Abstract: Introduction: Published studies of CD19 CAR T cells have shown unprecedented response rates in ALL but with a 23-27% incidence of severe Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and 27-50% incidence of severe neurotoxicity which may limit broader application. We developed a novel second generation CD19CAR (CAT-41BBz CAR) with a lower affinity and faster off-rate but equivalent on-rate than the FMC63-41BBz CAR (Kd 116 nM vs 0.9 nM, T1/2 10s vs 1260s) utilised in CTL019 currently under consideration by the FDA. Pre-clinical studies indicated T-cells transduced with CAT-41BBz mediate enhanced tumor clearance and show increased expansion in an NSG-NALM6 stress test model (Kramer et al., submitted). We here report interim results from a multi-centre, Phase I clinical study of autologous CAT-41BBz CAR T cells as therapy for high risk/relapsed paediatric ALL, CARPALL (NCT02443831) demonstrating efficacy with an excellent safety profile. Methods: Autologous T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads, transduced with a SIN lentiviral vector encoding CAT-41BBz CAR and expanded for 4 days prior to magnetic bead removal and cryopreservation. Transduction efficiency was assessed using an anti-idiotype antibody. Serum levels of cytokines associated with CRS were measured using cytometric bead array. All patients received lymphodepletion with fludarabine 150 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 1.5g/m2 followed by a single infusion of CAR T cells at a dose of 1x106 CAR+ T cells. Patients were monitored for the presence of CAR T cells in the blood by flow cytometry and by qPCR for the 41BBz junctional region, as well as circulating B cell count monthly for 6 months and then 6 weekly to 1 year. Disease status was assessed in the bone marrow morphologically, by IgH qPCR, as well as by flow cytometric assessment of MRD at the same time-points to establish durability of responses as a stand-alone therapy. The primary end-points were incidence of grade 3-5 toxicity related to CAR T cells within 30 days and the proportion of patients achieving molecular remission. Results: We have enrolled 10 patients and treated 8 to date. Six of 8 had relapsed post myeloablative SCT. The median disease burden prior to lymphodepletion was 9% blasts (ranging from molecular CR to 74% blasts, Table 1). It was possible to generate a product meeting release criteria in all but 1 patient (90% feasibility). Median transduction efficiency was 18.1% (range 6.7 to 76.3%). All treated patients received the anticipated dose of 1x106 CAR T cells/kg. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in all patients (grade 1 n=4, grade 2 n=4), but to date none have developed ≥ grade 3 CRS, required ICU admission or therapy with Tocilizumab. CRS was associated with modest elevations of IL-6, IFN-γ and IL-10 and resolved spontaneously in all. Grade 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 3 patients and resolved spontaneously, but no severe (≥grade 3) neurotoxicity was seen. Five patients had prolonged grade 4 neutropenia lasting & gt; 30 days but this resolved in all by 2 months. Only 1 patient experienced significant infective complications in the context of pre-existing poor marrow reserve following allogeneic SCT. 6/7 (86%) evaluable patients achieved molecular remission at a median of 30 days post infusion (range 30-60 days, Table 1). One patient did not respond and died of CD19+ disease progression. At a median follow-up of 5.9 months (range 28-328 days), 4/7 evaluable patients remain in flow MRD negative remission of whom 3 show no evidence of molecular MRD at 1, 7.5 and 9 months. Two patients relapsed with CD19- disease at 3 and 4 months post infusion: 1 of these remains alive with disease at 11 months and the other died of disease progression. Reflecting our pre-clinical data with CAT-41BBz CAR, we have seen excellent CAR T cell expansion (median 65459 copies/µg DNA at 1 month, range 609 to 230112) and persistence at up to 11 months post-infusion (Figure 1). All 7 evaluable patients have ongoing CAR T cell persistence detectable by both flow and qPCR as well as ongoing B cell aplasia at last follow-up. Conclusions: These interim results with a novel low affinity CD19 CAR show similar remission rates to those reported by US studies in paediatric ALL with an improved safety profile. No severe (grade ≥3) CRS or neurotoxicity has occurred to date despite high tumour burden in 4 patients. Excellent CAR T cell expansion has been documented, as well as long duration of CAR T cell persistence and associated B cell aplasia. Disclosures Ghorashian: UCL: Patents & Royalties: UCL Business. Kramer: UCL: Patents & Royalties: UCL Business. Lucchini: Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pule: Autolus Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; UCL: Patents & Royalties: UCL Business.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 138, No. Supplement 1 ( 2021-11-05), p. 3859-3859
    Abstract: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a new, effective treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Tisagenlecleucel achieved a complete remission (CR) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity of 81% at 3 months in the pivotal study; overall survival (OS) was 76% at 12 months (Maude et al, 2018). Real world data confirmed similar outcomes, with 1-year OS of 77% and event free survival (EFS) of 52% (Pasquini et al, 2020). Relapse can occur in the form of CD19 negative or CD19 positive ALL. The latter is associated with lack of persistence of the CAR T product. B-cell aplasia (BCA) is an indirect measure of CAR T presence. Early ( & lt;6 months from infusion) loss of BCA is associated with high relapse risk (Pillai et al, 2019); therefore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is often considered. However, SCT is associated with therapy-related morbidity and mortality and not all patients will find a suitable donor. Therefore, the optimal management of patients with loss of BCA is yet to be defined. In our centre, we administered maintenance therapy to a cohort of children with early loss of BCA. When compared to UK patients undergoing SCT for the same indication, we noted promising early outcomes. We report the findings here. We collected data on children with r/r ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) from January 2018 to January 2021 who presented loss of BCA without evidence of disease (negative molecular or flow cytometry MRD) within 12 months from infusion. Loss of BCA was defined as peripheral B-cell count ≥0.10 x 10^9/L or bone marrow (BM) CD19+ events ≥0.1%. We compared outcomes of children who received maintenance as per UKALL 2011 protocol at GOSH to those who received SCT for the same indication from all UK paediatric centres. Fourteen patients from GOSH met the inclusion criteria. Four had loss of BCA after 6 months from CAR T infusion, none of them received additional therapy and they are all alive and in CR at a median of 535 days after CAR T infusion (Figure 1, A and B). Ten patients recovered B cells at & lt;6 months: 3 proceeded to SCT, 6 started on maintenance therapy, 1 received other treatment. In 2 cases, maintenance was commenced after a second CAR T infusion. Two patients from the UK cohort met the inclusion criteria for the SCT group. Analysis was performed on 6 children who received maintenance and 5 who had SCT. Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar (male/female ratio, median age at infusion, cytogenetics). Time from infusion to loss of BCA did not differ: the median was 80 days (range 28-168) in children who had maintenance vs 93 days (range 28-150) in those who had SCT. At a median follow up of 511 days (range 222-812), 3/6 children who received maintenance relapsed at median 210 days after infusion and proceeded to further treatment, no patient relapsed post SCT. One child died of disease in the maintenance group 237 days after infusion, 2 children died of transplant related mortality in the SCT group at 222 and 422 days post infusion. OS and EFS did not differ statistically between the 2 groups, as shown in Figure 1 (C and D). We observed that outcome for patients who presented loss of BCA within or at 2 months from infusion was poor regardless of the intervention (maintenance or SCT). Management of patients who experience early loss of BCA after CAR T is challenging and there are little data to support optimal treatment. In our experience, maintenance therapy compared favourably with SCT with similar rate of OS and EFS. Of note, 2/5 patients died of TRM in the SCT group highlighting the toxicity of this approach in such heavily pre-treated patients. On the other hand, maintenance is a well tolerated, low-cost treatment which can be easily delivered on an out-patient basis. Our preliminary data support investigation of this strategy in larger, prospectively-recruited cohorts of patients. Moreover, our preliminary data suggest that the time of loss of BCA is a crucial clinical parameter, as children who developed it within 2 months from infusion had the worst outcome, possibly reflecting prior therapy intensity and its impact on autologous T cells. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Amrolia: ADC Therapeutics: Other: Named inventor on a patent which is being transferred to ADCT.; Autolus: Patents & Royalties. Ghorashian: UCLB: Patents & Royalties: CARPALL; Novartis: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 186, No. 2 ( 2019-07), p. 327-329
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 190, No. 5 ( 2020-09)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: British Journal of Haematology, Wiley, Vol. 199, No. 3 ( 2022-11), p. 447-451
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1048 , 1365-2141
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1475751-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...