In:
Progress in Transplantation, SAGE Publications, Vol. 14, No. 1 ( 2004-03), p. 29-32
Abstract:
Survival after transplantation has traditionally been the statistic most closely scrutinized as to the efficacy of the procedure and a program's performance. We propose that mortality from the time of listing is a more significant outcome measure for potential transplant candidates. We present our lung transplant program's outcomes using this measure. Methods An analysis was performed on all patients listed for lung transplantation at our institution between 1997 and 2002. Kaplan-Meier analyses of survival at 1, 2, and 3 years after listing were assessed. Results One hundred forty-eight patients qualified for the analysis; of these, 96 received transplants. The median time to transplantation was 142 days. Twenty-five of the patients died while waiting for a transplant. The median time to death for these patients was 311 days. Of the 27 transplant recipients who died, the median time from listing to death was 547 days. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality rates after being listed were 20.0%, 32.4%, and 39.7%, respectively, for all patients. Conclusions Mortality after listing is a more relevant statistic for prospective transplant candidates. Intraprogram comparisons of listed nontransplant survival to listed transplant survival may facilitate the acceptance of sicker patients for transplant consideration. It may also help foster the development of an “alternate” list for transplantation and prove useful in helping determine organ prioritization.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1526-9248
,
2164-6708
DOI:
10.1177/152692480401400104
Language:
English
Publisher:
SAGE Publications
Publication Date:
2004
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2864264-8
Permalink