GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (2)
  • British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery  (2)
  • Albergo, J. I.  (2)
Material
  • Online Resource  (2)
Publisher
  • British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery  (2)
Language
Years
  • 1
    In: The Bone & Joint Journal, British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 98-B, No. 8 ( 2016-08), p. 1138-1144
    Abstract: The purpose of this study was to review a large cohort of patients and further assess the correlation between the histological response to chemotherapy in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma with the overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). Patients and Methods All patients treated for Ewing’s sarcoma between 1980 and 2012 were reviewed. Of these, 293 patients without metastases at the time of diagnosis and treated with chemotherapy and surgery were included. Patients were grouped according to the percentage of necrosis after chemotherapy: Group I: 0% to 50%, Group II: 51% to 99% and Group III: 100%. Results The mean age at diagnosis was 16 years (1 to 62) and the mean follow-up was 9.1 years (six months to 32.6 years). The OS and EFS for the series were 75% and 65% at five years. There were significant differences in survival between the groups of necrosis: 0% to 50% (OS: 49% and EFS: 45% at five years, respectively) compared with 51% to 99% (OS: 72% and EFS: 59% at five years, respectively) and 100% (OS: 94% and EFS: 81% at five years, respectively) (p  〈  0.001). There were no significant differences in survival between patients treated between 1980 and 1989 compared with those treated between 1990 and 1999, and those treated between 2000 and 2012 (p = 0.55). Conclusion Only patients with 100% necrosis after chemotherapy should be classified as having a good response to chemotherapy because they have significantly better rates of survival compared with those with any viable tumour in the surgical specimen. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1138–44.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2049-4394 , 2049-4408
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2697480-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery ; 2015
    In:  The Bone & Joint Journal Vol. 97-B, No. 12 ( 2015-12), p. 1698-1703
    In: The Bone & Joint Journal, British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, Vol. 97-B, No. 12 ( 2015-12), p. 1698-1703
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and therapeutic factors which influence the oncological outcome of parosteal osteosarcoma. A total of 80 patients with a primary parosteal osteosarcoma were included in this retrospective study. There were 51 females and 29 males with a mean age of 29.9 years (11 to 78). The mean follow-up was 11.2 years (1 to 40). Overall survival was 91.8% at five years and 87.8% at ten years. Local recurrence occurred in 14 (17.5%) patients and was associated with intralesional surgery and a large volume of tumour. On histological examination, 80% of the local recurrences were dedifferentiated high-grade tumours. A total of 12 (14.8%) patients developed pulmonary metastases, of whom half had either a dedifferentiated tumour or a local recurrence. Female gender and young age were good prognostic factors. Local recurrence was a poor prognostic factor for survival. Medullary involvement or the use of chemotherapy had no impact on survival. The main goal in treating a parosteal osteosarcoma must be to achieve a wide surgical margin, as inadequate margins are associated with local recurrence. Local recurrence has a significant negative effect on survival, as 80% of the local recurrences are high-grade dedifferentiated tumours, and half of these patients develop metastases. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of parosteal osteosarcoma is not as obvious as it is in the treatment of conventional osteosarcoma. The mainstay of treatment is wide local excision. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1698–1703.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2049-4394 , 2049-4408
    Language: English
    Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2697480-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...