GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (1)
  • Portuguese  (1)
Material
  • Online Resource  (1)
Publisher
Language
  • Portuguese  (1)
Years
  • 1
    In: Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 57, No. 03 ( 2022-06), p. 480-487
    Abstract: Objective The present study aimed to correlate functional outcomes and implant positioning in a case series of partial shoulder resurfacing arthroplasties. Methods A total of 25 patients were assessed for range of motion, functional outcome per the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score and radiographic findings. Pre- and postoperative data were compared. In addition, patients were grouped according to the cervical-diaphyseal angle (CDA) determined by an anteroposterior radiography and to the retroversion angle (RVA) determined by an axillary radiography. A CDA from 130° to 140° and a RVA from 20° to 40° consisted in ideal positioning (anatomical standard). Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Kruskal-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney test as appropriate. Results The mean follow-up time was 48.3 months (12 to 67 months). The postoperative functional score (31.5) was higher than the preoperative score (15.5) (p  〈  0.001). In 6 patients, the implant was in anatomical positioning, while implant positioning was considered “nonstandard” in 19 subjects. Seven patients had a CDA  〈  130°, and 14 patients had a CDA ranging from 130° to 140°; in addition, the CDA was  〉  140° in 4 subjects. The RVA was up to 20° in 15 patients and ranged from 20° to 40° in 10 subjects. Using these criteria to group patients, the postoperative clinical-functional parameters were not statistically different from the preoperative findings (p  〉  0.05). Conclusion Partial shoulder resurfacing results in significant postoperative functional recovery in patients with degenerative joint diseases. However, implant positioning assessed by CDA and RVA does not correlate with clinical-functional outcomes and, therefore, it is an inaccurate indicator of surgical success. Level of Evidence IV; Case Series.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0102-3616 , 1982-4378
    Language: Portuguese
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2411301-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...