GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e17061-e17061
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e17061-e17061
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e17054-e17054
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e17054-e17054
    Abstract: e17054 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death among males in the United States. Screening recommendations and treatments for PC have changed considerably over the past two decades, with differential effects across sociodemographic groups. This study aims to characterize trends in incidence of PC from 2000 to 2018 by age, race, region, and rurality to better understand these effects on incidence. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), which represents patients for all 50 states. Incidence rates and average annual percent change (AAPC) were calculated using SEER*Stat software. Incident rates were calculated as the number of new cancers arising in the prostate (ICD-O-3 Site Code: C619) per 100,000 males. Trends across sociodemographic groups were analyzed and visualized in R. Results: PC incidence decreased significantly for all ages 40 and above from 2000 to 2018. Ages 85+ experienced the sharpest decline with an AAPC of -5.5% (95% CI: -6.0% to -5.1%). However, for all 5-year age brackets between 60 and 85, incidence reaches a minimum in 2014 before rising again as shown by segmented regression analysis. All race/ethnicity groups experienced a significant decline in incidence from 2000 to 2018 with sharpest decline in Hispanics -3.9% (95% CI: -4.5% to -3.3%). All regions also experienced a significant decline, with the greatest decline in the West at -4.0 (95% CI: -4.7 to -3.3). Metropolitan counties experienced a greater decline than nonmetropolitan. Patients ages 65 to 79, of Black race/ethnicity, and metropolitan groups had the highest overall incidence over the study period in their respective categories with 2018 incidences of 663, 181, and 115 per 100,000 males respectively. Conclusions: Nearly all sociodemographic groups have experienced a decline in the incidence of PC from 2000 to 2018. However, PC incidence increased from 2014 to 2018 for several sociodemographic groups. Importantly, 65 to 79 year olds, Black Americans, and metropolitan groups had the highest incidence over the study period. This study demonstrates a sustained rise in incidence of PC for several sociodemographic groups, as well as identifies groups at higher risk of PC. These trends may be due to evolving PC screening guidelines and merit further investigation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2021
    In:  JAMA Network Open Vol. 4, No. 10 ( 2021-10-07), p. e2128530-
    In: JAMA Network Open, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 4, No. 10 ( 2021-10-07), p. e2128530-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2574-3805
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2931249-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 550-550
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 550-550
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: npj Breast Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 9, No. 1 ( 2023-06-08)
    Abstract: Adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for ER+/HER2− early-stage breast cancers (eBC) involve integrating prognostic and predictive information which rely on physician judgment; this can lead to discordant recommendations. In this study we aim to evaluate whether Oncotype DX improves confidence and agreement among oncologists in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations. We randomly select 30 patients with ER+/HER2− eBC and recurrence score (RS) available from an institutional database. We ask 16 breast oncologists with varying years of clinical practice in Italy and the US to provide recommendation for the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy and their degree of confidence in the recommendation twice; first, based on clinicopathologic features only (pre-RS), and then with RS result (post-RS). Pre-RS, the average rate of chemotherapy recommendation is 50.8% and is higher among junior (62% vs 44%; p   〈  0.001), but similar by country. Oncologists are uncertain in 39% of cases and recommendations are discordant in 27% of cases (interobserver agreement K 0.47). Post-RS, 30% of physicians change recommendation, uncertainty in recommendation decreases to 5.6%, and discordance decreases to 7% (interobserver agreement K 0.85). Interpretation of clinicopathologic features alone to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy results in 1 out of 4 discordant recommendations and relatively high physician uncertainty. Oncotype DX results decrease discordancy to 1 out of 15, and reduce physician uncertainty. Genomic assay results reduce subjectivity in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for ER +/HER2− eBC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-4677
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2843288-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2018
    In:  npj Breast Cancer Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2018-01-25)
    In: npj Breast Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2018-01-25)
    Abstract: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with bone only metastasis (BOM) are a unique population with limited characterization. We identified patients followed at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 01/01/1997 to 12/31/2015 for at least 6 months with a BOM diagnosis as first site of metastasis. Tumor subtype (TS) was assessed by initial breast biopsy immunohistochemistry using hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2 status, with four subtypes identified: HR+/HER2−, HR+/HER2+, HR−/HER2−, HR−/HER2+. HR+ was defined as estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor ≥1%. We identified 1445 patients with BOM, 1048 with TS data available. Among these patients, the majority were HR+/HER2− (78%). Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to first bone metastasis was 2.3 years (95% CI 2.1, 2.5) and varied significantly by TS, with longer time to distant disease in HR+/HER2− patients relative to all other TS ( p   〈  .0001). Median overall survival (OS) from breast cancer diagnosis was 8.7 years (95% CI 8.0, 9.7) and varied significantly by TS with poorer OS for HR−/HER2− and HR-/HER2+ patients relative to HR+/HER2− TS ( p   〈  .0001). The 442 patients with de novo BOM disease, defined as bone metastasis diagnosis within 4 months of breast cancer diagnosis, had significantly shorter OS ( p   〈  .0001). Overall, several higher risk BOM subsets were identified in this analysis, most notably HR−/HER2+ and HR−/HER2− TS and de novo BOM patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-4677
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2843288-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 23, No. 9 ( 2017-09), p. 1473-1477
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-8791
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3056525-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2057605-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 11043-11043
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 11043-11043
    Abstract: 11043 Background: The ASCO and American Society of Radiation Oncologists (ASTRO) have recently committed to initiatives on increasing URM representation in the radiation oncology workforce. This study aims to assess representation trends in radiation oncology training programs across five academic years in order to understand representation trends and better guide initiatives moving forward. Methods: Data on racial and ethnic representation from the ACGME Data Resource Books over a span of five academic years (2015-2020) was included. URM was defined as those who identified as Hispanic, Black, or Native American/Alaskan in concordance with AAMC definition. Chi square testing was used to compare the proportion of residency positions occupied by URM residents by self-identified race and ethnicity in radiation oncology to that of hematology and medical oncology, complex general surgical oncology, and all other specialties. Results: A total of 3,315 radiation oncology positions were identified over the study period, 2015 and 2020. 1,938 (58.5%) of radiation oncology residency positions were filled by residents who identified as White, 967 (29.2%) as Asian/ Pacific Islander, 126 (3.8%) as Hispanic, 120 (3.6%) as Black, 7 (0.2%) as Native American/ Alaskan, and 157 (4.7%) as Other. URM representation was 7.6% in total and was relatively stagnant, remaining between 7.3% and 8.0% across study years. Results of chi square comparative analysis demonstrated lower rates of representation in radiation oncology in comparison to hematology and medical oncology as well as all other specialties (Table). Conclusions: There is lack of racial and ethnic diversity in radiation-oncology residency training positions in the United States. Over the five-year study period, only 7.6% of trainees identified as URM. URMs have significantly lower rates of representation in radiation-oncology compared to hematology and medical oncology, and other specialties. Efforts to mitigate disparities require a multifaceted approach.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: The Oncologist, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 23, No. 11 ( 2018-11-01), p. 1282-1288
    Abstract: Patients with metastatic breast cancer with bone-only metastases (BOM) are a unique patient population without consensus regarding high-risk characteristics, which we sought to establish. Methods We identified 1,445 patients with BOM followed for at least 6 months at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2015. Results Seventy-one percent (n = 936) of the 1,325 patients with BOM with available pain characterization were symptomatic at time of BOM diagnosis. Pain was more common in patients with lytic compared with blastic or sclerotic metastases (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI,] 1.26–2.53) and multiple versus single bone metastases (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03–1.83). Poorer overall survival (OS) was also noted in patients with multiple bone metastases (median OS, 4.80 years; 95% CI, 4.49–5.07) compared with single bone metastasis (median OS, 7.54 years; 95% CI, 6.28–10.10) and in patients with metastases in both the axial and appendicular skeleton (median OS, 4.58 years; 95% CI, 4.23–4.96) compared with appendicular-only (median OS, 6.78 years; 95% CI, 5.26–7.96) or axial-only metastases (median OS, 5.62 years; 95% CI, 4.81–6.69). Black/non-Hispanic patients had poorer outcomes, and patients aged 40–49 years at time of breast cancer diagnosis had significantly better OS compared with both younger and older patient groups. Conclusion Overall, several risk features for decreased OS were identified, including multiple bone metastases and both axial and appendicular skeleton involvement. Multiple bone metastases and lytic bone metastases were associated with increased pain. Implications for Practice Patients with metastatic breast cancer and bone-only metastases (BOM) represent a poorly characterized patient subset. The ability to identify unique patient characteristics at time of BOM diagnosis associated with increased morbidity or mortality would allow for recognition of patients who would benefit from more aggressive therapy. In this study, the largest sample of patients with BOM thus far reported is characterized, highlighting several higher-risk BOM groups, including those with multiple bone metastases and bone metastases in both the axial and appendicular skeleton at time of BOM diagnosis. In addition to tailoring current practices for these high-risk patients, ongoing studies of these patients are indicated.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1083-7159 , 1549-490X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2023829-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2020
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. P4-14-02-P4-14-02
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. P4-14-02-P4-14-02
    Abstract: Introduction: Breast cancer continues to be the most common cancer diagnosed in pregnant women. Management of breast cancer in pregnant patients requires finding a fine balance between treating the pregnant patient adequately while minimizing toxicity to the fetus. Our objective was to evaluate overall (OS) survival and disease-free survival (DFS) of women with breast cancer treated with standard chemotherapy during pregnancy compared to non-pregnant breast cancer patients. Methods: Pregnant patients treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center during 1989-2018 for stage I-III breast cancer were matched to non-pregnant breast cancer patients. We used coarsened exact matching (CEM) on pretreatment age category ( & lt; 30, 30-35, & gt; 35), diagnosis year ( & lt; 1997, 1997 - 2004, & gt; 2004), tumor stage (I vs. II/III), HER2 status, and hormone receptor status. Next, we used propensity score matching within CEM strata to prune matches to no more than 2 per pregnant case, and CEM weights were recalculated to use in analyses. Our resulting sample included 93 of 99 eligible pregnant patients from a registry trial and 190 of 13,470 non-pregnant patients from an institutional database of breast cancer patients. We reviewed medical records to collect follow-up data and compared OS and DFS between cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method log-rank test. The Institutional Review Board approved this study (protocol #PA 18-0038). Results: Median age at diagnosis was 33.5 (Interquartile range (IQR) 6.7) for the pregnant cohort and 33.5 (IQR 9.2) for the non-pregnant cohort. In each cohort, 7.5% had a stage I tumor, and for the pregnant vs. non-pregnant cohort, 46% vs. 60% were stage II and 46% vs. 32% were stage III. The median time to treatment start with chemotherapy from pathologic diagnosis was 35 days (IQR 32.5) for pregnant patients and 31 days (IQR 44) for non-pregnant patients. All patients in the pregnant cohort and 91% in the non-pregnant cohort received chemotherapy. For each cohort, 51% were hormone receptor positive, 22% were HER2 positive, and 41% had triple negative disease. Median follow-up for patients who were alive at the end of follow-up was 5.4 years (IQR 10.5). In univariable analyses, cohorts did not show statistically significant differences in DFS (p = 0.13) or OS (p = 0.38). For pregnant and non-pregnant cohorts respectively, 5-year DFS was 77% (95% CI 66%, 85%) and 65% (95% CI 52%, 76%), and 5-year OS was 82% (95% CI 72%, 89%) and 80% (95% CI 67%, 88%). Multivariable results will be reported. All pregnant patients had viable babies at term. Conclusion: This study suggests that patients with breast cancer during pregnancy can be treated safely with chemotherapy and have survival comparable to that of non-pregnant patients. Long term outcomes for pregnant breast cancer patients and their children exposed to chemotherapy in utero should continue. Citation Format: Oluchi Oke, Carla Warneke, Ashley Martinez, Richard Theriault, Jennifer Litton. Cohort study of women treated with chemotherapy for breast cancer during pregnancy compared with non-pregnant breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-02.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...