GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
  • Cohn, Allen Lee  (2)
  • English  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)  (2)
Language
  • English  (2)
Years
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 3_suppl ( 2014-01-20), p. 304-304
    Abstract: 304 Background: GIDEON is a global, prospective, noninterventional study to evaluate sorafenib (SOR) safety under real-life practice conditions. Here we examine potential factors that may have had an impact on initial SOR dose (ID) selection in the U.S. cohort of GIDEON. Methods: Patients (pts) with unresectable HCC who were candidates for systemic therapy and for whom a decision was made to treat with SOR were eligible for inclusion. ID choice was at physician discretion. Baseline characteristics were analyzed for their potential impact on the choice of ID. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated by ID. All results are descriptive. Results: 563 pts were valid for safety. 54% of pts received the recommended ID of 800 mg/d, 35% received 400 mg/d, and 11% other (includes 100, 200, 600 mg/d. dose). Among pts who had an ID 〈 800 mg/d, 37% underwent a dose increase to 800 mg/d. ID did not appear to differ by baseline Child-Pugh or its components, BCLC stage, etiology, or body mass index. By ECOG performance status (PS), IDs of 800/ 〈 800 mg/day were given as follows: PS ≤1: 55%/45%; PS ≥2: 44%/56%. By age, corresponding values were 57%/42% for 〈 75 yr; 33%/67% for ≥75 yr. The incidence of AEs was similar across dose levels (Table). Conclusions: Baseline liver function, tumor stage, and etiology did not seem to have an influence on ID selection. We observed a trend toward lower ID in pts with age ≥75 yr and PS ≥2. Despite differences in average daily dose and time on drug, the safety profile for each ID was similar and dose adjustments may have contributed. Additional analyses are being evaluated to assess these and other contributing factors. Clinical trial information: NCT00812175. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 3_suppl ( 2014-01-20), p. 323-323
    Abstract: 323 Background: Because HCC usually occurs in the presence of liver disease, patient (pt) evaluation and treatment are complex and require multidisciplinary care. Tumor staging and liver function scoring systems facilitate HCC research and treatment. However, specialists have varied training in these systems. We evaluated specialty-specific reporting of HCC-related staging/scoring data. Methods: GIDEON is a global, prospective, non-interventional study to evaluate sorafenib (SOR) in HCC under real-life practice conditions. Pts with unresectable HCC who were candidates for systemic therapy and for whom a decision was made to treat with SOR were eligible. Frequency of recorded Child-Pugh (CP); Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC); Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP); Tumor, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM); and calculated Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) data were analyzed by physician specialty. Results are descriptive. Results: In the safety population (n=563), 299 pts (41%) were enrolled by medical oncology (MO), 228 (40%) by hepatology/gastroenterology (H/G), and 39 (5%) by other (23 by surgeons; 7 by interventional radiologists). 89% were treated by a multidisciplinary team. MO pts were twice as likely as H/G pts to be not evaluable (NE) for CP (table). Unknown international normalized ratio (INR) was the primary reason CP was NE. MO and H/G pts had similar % NE for BCLC stage. H/G pts were more likely to have ECOG performance status (PS) not recorded. MO pts were less likely to have CLIP or MELD data, while H/G pts were less likely to have TNM data. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were unknown in 17% overall. Conclusions: The elements of HCC staging systems represent factors that may influence patient management. Lack of complete data in up to 44% of pts, despite registry enrollment requiring data collection, suggests clinicians may be missing important information and the prevalence of clinicians using comprehensive HCC staging systems is variable. Clinical trial information: NCT00812175. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...