Abstract: Early data on venetoclax-containing regimens for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) show promising results with deep remissions, but are hampered by potential risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Whether optimal duration of venetoclax treatment can be guided by minimal residual disease (MRD) is currently unknown. To study whether TLS risk can be mitigated in an unfit population by introducing preinduction, and whether MRD-guided duration of venetoclax treatment is a feasible and efficacious approach, we performed the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hemato-oncology (HOVON) 139/GIVE trial. The study treatment consists of 4 treatment phases: preinduction (2 cycles obinutuzumab), induction I (6 cycles obinutuzumab and venetoclax), induction II (6 cycles venetoclax), and a randomization phase (group A: maintenance with 12 additional cycles of venetoclax irrespective of MRD; group B: MRD guided venetoclax maintenance with a maximum of 12 cycles). Here we report on a planned interim safety analysis as well as preliminary efficacy and MRD data of the first 30 patients enrolled. Downgrading of TLS risk after preinduction occurred in 25 patients: 3 from high to medium, 3 from high to low, and 19 from medium to low risk. No patient remained high risk. From these 30 patients, peripheral blood MRD data were obtained for 28 patients at the end of induction II (6 months after the last obinutuzumab dose), of whom 26 had undetectable MRD levels, and for 18 patients who reached the 3-month after-randomization point, of whom 16 had undetectable MRD levels. Obinutuzumab preinduction is tolerated well in these unfit patients and results in abrogating high TLS risk in all patients. Preliminary data indicate that efficacy is maintained with a high proportion of patients with undetectable MRD levels after combination treatment.

Abstract: Morbidity and mortality due to immunosuppression remain among the foremost clinical challenges in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although immunosuppression is considered to originate within the lymph node (LN) microenvironment, alterations in T and natural killer (NK) cells have almost exclusively been studied in peripheral blood (PB). Whereas chemoimmunotherapy further deteriorates immune function, novel targeted agents like the B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor venetoclax potentially spare nonmalignant lymphocytes; however, the effects of venetoclax on nonleukemic cells have not been explored. We address these unresolved issues using a comprehensive analysis of nonmalignant lymphocytes in paired LN and PB samples from untreated CLL patients, and by analyzing the effects of venetoclax-based treatment regimens on the immune system in PB samples from previously untreated and relapsed/refractory patients. CLL-derived LNs contained twice the amount of suppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) and CLL supportive follicular T helper (Tfh) cells compared with PB. This was accompanied by a low frequency of cytotoxic lymphocytes. The expression of PD-1 by CD8+ T cells was significantly higher in LN compared with PB. Venetoclax-based treatment led to deep responses in the majority of patients, but also to decreased absolute numbers of B, T, and NK cells. Tfh cell, Treg, and PD-1+ CD8+ T cell numbers were reduced more than fivefold after venetoclax-based therapy, and overproduction of inflammatory cytokines was reduced. Furthermore, we observed restoration of NK cell function. These data support the notion that the immunosuppressive state in CLL is more prominent within the LN. Venetoclax-based regimens reduced the immunosuppressive footprint of CLL, suggesting immune recovery after the elimination of leukemic cells.

Abstract: Introduction Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by a profound immune suppression. In addition, CLL cells evade immune destruction by interacting with cells of the adaptive immune system, resulting in dysfunctional T cells. CD4+ T cells are skewed towards a TH2-profile and the number of regulatory T (Treg) cells, that diminish cellular immune responses, is increased in CLL patients. CD8+ T cells resemble exhausted T cells and have reduced cytotoxic, yet increased cytokine production capacity. The cytotoxic function of NK cells is impaired in CLL patients, but in contrast to CD8+ T cells their cytokine production is also compromised, presumably induced by CLL cells. These data are chiefly obtained from studies on peripheral blood (PB). Although the lymph node (LN) compartment has a central role in the pathobiology of CLL, very little is known about the composition of non-malignant lymphocytes in LN tissue. The Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven) is highly effective in CLL and, especially in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as obinutuzumab (O), results in high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD) undetectable responses. However, the prospective effects of venetoclax on non-malignant lymphocytes in patient samples remain largely unexplored. Methods PB and LN biopsy specimens were collected at baseline from patients enrolled in the 1st-line FCR-unfit HOVON 139 / GIVE trial. Study treatment consisted of O (cycle 1-2), Ven+O (cycle 3-8) and Ven (cycle 9-14). Immune composition was analyzed by 7-color flow cytometry. Baseline PB samples were compared to paired LN samples. Moreover, PB samples of the first patients that completed 6 cycles of Ven monotherapy (cycle 14) were compared to baseline. Cytokine production and degranulation of T and NK cells was studied after stimulation of PBMCs with PMA/Ionomycin. Results Comparison of LN (n=28) vs PB (n=48) revealed a larger proportion of T cells in LN (13.2% vs 5.1% of the lymphocytes), at the expense of CLL cells, with a skewed CD4:CD8 ratio (5.2 in LN vs 1.8 in PB). Within the CD4+ T cells, significantly higher levels of both follicular T helper cells (15. 7% vs 5.2%) and Tregs (11.5% vs 6.9%) were found in LN (see Table). CD4+ T cells mostly consisted of naïve and memory T cells in both PB and LN. There were fewer CD8+ T cells and especially fewer effector CD8+ T cells in the LN in comparison to PB. CD8+ T cells in LN mostly had a naïve and memory phenotype. An increased percentage of LN-residing CD8+ T cells expressed the exhaustion marker PD-1 as compared to PB CD8+ T cells (30.4% in LN vs 12.4% in PB). We then compared PB baseline samples to PB obtained after cycle 14 (n=11). Ten patients achieved MRD undetectable levels ( 〈 10-4, determined by flow cytometry) and 1 patient was MRD intermediate (10-4-10-2). As expected, the treatment regimen led to complete elimination of CD19+ B cells. In contrast, absolute numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells did not change during treatment. Differentiation status of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells remained similar. Interestingly, the proportion and absolute number of Tregs decreased after treatment (6.1% vs 0.9% of CD4+ T cells). After stimulation with PMA/Ionomycin, the percentage of IL-2 producing CD4+ T cells increased after treatment, leading to a higher IL-2:IL-4 ratio, that suggests normalization towards a TH1-profile. Fewer CD8+ T cells expressed PD-1 after treatment. The fraction of CD8+ T cells that produced IFN-γ (69.8% vs 56.2%) and TNF-α (58.4% vs 40.3%) decreased. Degranulation of CD8+ T cells did not change upon treatment. After treatment, the capacity of NK cells to degranulate increased. In addition, a larger proportion of NK cells produced IFN-γ, suggesting recovery of NK cell function after treatment. Conclusion In conclusion, our data strengthen the view that CLL cells reside in an immune suppressive environment in the LN. Moreover, we provide the first evidence that the Ven+O regimen does not harm non-malignant lymphocyte populations other than B cells. Both the improved cytokine production of NK cells and diminished cytokine production of CD8+ T cells may point to normalization of immune function. Collectively, the phenotypical and functional changes observed may reflect the eradication of the immunosuppressive CLL clone by Ven+O and subsequent recovery of the immune microenvironment in CLL patients. Disclosures Eldering: Celgene: Research Funding. Mobasher:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Other: Ownership interests non-PLC; Genentech Inc: Employment. Levin:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kater:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background: For fit CLL patients (pts), continuous BTK inhibitor treatment is replacing CIT as standard of care in frontline setting, particularly in pts with unfavorable prognostic factors. The time limited combinations venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (GVe) and venetoclax plus rituximab (RVe) have produced high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), which strongly associates with long progression-free survival (PFS) both in frontline and relapsed setting. For frontline therapy GVe is approved in this setting based on data from the CLL14 trial in an unfit population. However, data from a fit cohort are not yet available. The GAIA (CLL13) trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of three Ven+CD20 antibody-based regimens in comparison to CIT as a frontline treatment for fit pts with CLL and without TP53 mutation/deletion. Methods: Treatment-naïve fit (CIRS ≤6, normal creatinine clearance with ≥ 70ml/min) CLL pts requiring therapy were eligible. Based on known poor response to CIT, pts with TP53 aberrations were excluded. Pts were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive six courses of CIT (FCR for pt ≤65 years: fludarabine 25 mg/m² d1-3, cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² d1-3, rituximab 375 mg/m² d1 cycle 1 and 500 mg/m² d1 cycle 2-6; BR for pt & gt;65 years: bendamustine 90mg/m² d1-2, rituximab) or one of three venetoclax (V) combinations (standard ramp-up from cycle 1 d22, 400 mg/d cycle 2-12): V and rituximab (375/500mg/m² d1 cycle 1-6) [RVe], V and obinutuzumab (1000 mg d1, 8, 15 cycle 1 and d1 cycle 2-6) [GVe] , or V, obinutuzumab and ibrutinib (420 mg/d cycle 1-12, if MRD-detectable continued until cycle 36) [GIVe] . Pts were stratified according to country, Binet stage and age (≤ 65/ & gt; 65 years). The co-primary endpoints of the trial are (1) the rate of uMRD ( & lt;10-4) by flow in peripheral blood (PB) at month 15 (MO15, GVe vs CIT) and (2) PFS (GIVe vs CIT), each with a significance level of 2.5%. The co-primary endpoint PFS will be analyzed within a pre-planned interim analysis as soon as 138 (65%) PFS events will have been reported in the GIVe and CIT arm. The co-primary endpoint analysis of uMRD per protocol was performed after the last MO15 MRD sample had been collected. In addition, comparisons regarding uMRD for all study arms were performed using a pre-specified hierarchical test sequence. Bone marrow (BM) was evaluated 3 months after end of treatment (MO9 for CIT, MO15 for all others arms) in pts with clinical CR. Key secondary endpoints as investigator-assessed responses according to iwCLL 2008 guidelines and safety were analyzed. Trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02950051). Results: A total of 926 pts (CIT: 229 (150 FCR, 79 BR), RVe: 237, GVe: 229, GIVe: 231) with a median age of 61 years (range 27-84) were accrued between 12/2016 and 09/2019. The majority of pts were in advanced Binet stage (B: 37.8%, C: 35.6%) and unmutated IGHV status was present in 56%. Fourteen pts did not receive study treatment (13 FCR, 1 GVe) and were not included in the safety population. The data cut for the first co-primary endpoint analysis was February 28, 2021. The median observation time was 27.9 months. The co-primary endpoint uMRD in PB at MO15 was met as the rate of uMRD in ITT population was significantly higher in GVe compared to CIT: 86.5% (97.5% CI 80.6-91.1) vs 52.0% (CI 44.4-59.5; p & lt;0.0001), respectively. GIVe also showed a superior uMRD rate of 92.2% (CI 87.3-95.7) compared to CIT (p & lt;0.0001), while RVe (57.0%, CI 49.5-64.2) did not (p=0.317) (Figure 1A). Corresponding BM uMRD rates in ITT population were 37.1% (CIT), 43.0% (RVe), 72.5% (GVe) and 77.9% (GIVe), respectively. MO15 overall response rates and complete response rates (CRR) are shown in Figure 1B. The most common grade 3-5 treatment-emergent AE were neutropenia (50.5% of all pts), thrombocytopenia (12.2%), tumor lysis syndrome (7.5%), infusion-related reaction (7.2%), febrile neutropenia (6.5%) and pneumonia (5.3%)). Atrial fibrillation and bleeding events occurred more frequently in GIVe while infusion-related reactions were most common in the GVe arm (Table 1). The absolute numbers of second malignancies were 33, 19, 22 and 21 for CIT, RVe, GVe and GIVe. Fatal AEs occurred in 5, 7, 6 and 9 of the patients. Conclusions: The time-limited therapies of GVe and GIVe provided superior uMRD rates in PB at MO 15 compared to CIT. In addition, uMRD rates in BM and CRR were higher in GVe and GIVe in particular than in CIT. All arms showed a good safety profile in this fit pt population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Eichhorst: AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Speakers Bureau; Hexal: Speakers Bureau; ArQule: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oxford Biomedica (UK): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accomodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Consultant Department I for Internal Medicine: Consultancy; University Hospital of Cologne: Current Employment. Kater: Genmab, LAVA: Other: Ad Board, Steering Committee; Janssen, AstraZeneca: Other: Ad Board, steering committee, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Ad Board, Research Funding; BMS, Roche/Genentech: Other: Ad Board, , Research Funding. Von Tresckow: Celgene: Other: travel grant; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Reasearch support, travel grant; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Reasearch support, travel grant; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel grant. Staber: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tadmor: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Poulsen: Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Janssens: Sanofi: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Beigene, AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Trael Grant, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie, Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Noesslinger: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie,: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Jaeger: Norvartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frederiksen: Abbvie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Hebart: Roche: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Simon: Gilead: Other: Travel support. Fink: AbbVie: Other: travel grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Fischer: Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants. Kreuzer: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ritgen: Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Chugai: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel support. Brüggemann: Amgen: Other: Advisory Board, Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Levin: Roche, Janssen, Abbvie: Other: Travel Expenses, Ad-Board. Stilgenbauer: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis: Other: Research Support; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis: Consultancy; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis: Honoraria; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, GSK, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Sunesis: Research Funding. Hallek: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib in combaintion with Venetoclax + Obinutuzumab is not approved.

Abstract: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)–related symptoms and morbidity related to the advanced age at diagnosis impairs the well-being of older adult patients. Therefore, it is essential to tailor treatment according to geriatric characteristics and aim for an improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as a primary treatment goal. In the HOVON139/GiVe trial, 12 cycles of fixed-duration venetoclax plus obinutuzumab (Ven-O) were shown to be effective and tolerable in FCR (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab)-unfit patients with CLL (n = 67). However, prolonged venetoclax exposure as consolidation treatment led to increased toxicity with limited effect on minimal residual disease. To assess the impact of geriatric assessment on treatment outcomes and the patients’ HRQoL, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including function, depression, cognition, nutrition, physical performance, muscle parameters, comorbidities, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer C30 and CLL17 questionnaires were assessed. At baseline, geriatric impairments were present in & gt;90% of patients and ≥2 impairments present in 60% of patients predicted grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicity. During treatment, the number of geriatric impairments diminished significantly and clinically relevant improvements in HRQoL subscales were reached for global health status, physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, dyspnea, physical condition or fatigue, and worries or fears related to health and functioning. These improvements were comparable for patients receiving venetoclax consolidation and patients in whom treatment could mostly be discontinued. Collectively, frontline fixed-duration Ven-O improves overall PROs in older, unfit patients with CLL with and without geriatric impairments. This study was registered at EudraCT as 2015-004985-27 and the Netherlands Trial Register as NTR6043.