GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) ; 2022
    In:  University of Toronto Law Journal Vol. 72, No. 2 ( 2022-03-01), p. 155-188
    In: University of Toronto Law Journal, University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress), Vol. 72, No. 2 ( 2022-03-01), p. 155-188
    Kurzfassung: We have a data transparency problem. Currently, one of the main mechanisms we have to understand data flows is through the self-reporting that organizations provide through privacy policies. These suffer from many well-known problems, problems that are becoming more acute with the increasing complexity of the data ecosystem and the role of third parties – the affiliates, partners, processors, ad agencies, analytic services, and data brokers involved in the contemporary data practices of organizations. In this article, we argue that automating privacy policy analysis can improve the usability of privacy policies as a transparency mechanism. Our argument has five parts. First, we claim that we need to shift from thinking about privacy policies as a transparency mechanism that enhances consumer choice and see them as a transparency mechanism that enhances meaningful accountability. Second, we discuss a research tool that we prototyped, called AppTrans (for Application Transparency), which can detect inconsistencies between the declarations in a privacy policy and the actions the mobile application can potentially take if it is used. We used AppTrans to test seven hundred applications and found that 59.5 per cent were collecting data in ways that were not declared in their policies. The vast majority of the discrepancies were due to third party data collection such as advertising and analytics. Third, we outline the follow-on research we did to extend AppTrans to analyse the information sharing of mobile applications with third parties, with mixed results. Fourth, we situate our findings in relation to the third party issues that came to light in the recent Cambridge Analytica scandal and the calls from regulators for enhanced technical safeguards in managing these third party relationships. Fifth, we discuss some of the limitations of privacy policy automation as a strategy for enhanced data transparency and the policy implications of these limitations.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0042-0220 , 1710-1174
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
    Publikationsdatum: 2022
    ZDB Id: 2067133-7
    SSG: 2
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    In: Human Biology, Project MUSE, Vol. 77, No. 5 ( 2005), p. 577-617
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1534-6617
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Project MUSE
    Publikationsdatum: 2005
    ZDB Id: 2066422-9
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Wiley ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Vol. 49, No. 2-3 ( 2017-03), p. 443-468
    In: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Wiley, Vol. 49, No. 2-3 ( 2017-03), p. 443-468
    Kurzfassung: Most dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models with a housing market do not explicitly include a rental market and assume a tight mapping between house prices and rents over the business cycle. However, rents are much smoother than house prices in the data. We match this feature of the data by adding both an owner‐occupied housing market and a rental market in a standard DSGE model. The intertemporal preference shock accounts for more than half of the variation in house prices and contributes to residential investment fluctuations through the liquidity constraint, and nominal rigidity in rental contracts captures the variation in the price‐rent ratio.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0022-2879 , 1538-4616
    URL: Issue
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2017
    ZDB Id: 2010422-4
    ZDB Id: 218362-6
    SSG: 3,2
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...