In:
Perspectives on Science, MIT Press, Vol. 6, No. 3 ( 1998-09-01), p. 232-258
Abstract:
We question the claim, common since Duhem, that sixteenth century astronomy, and especially the Wittenberg interpretation of Copernicus, was instrumentalistic rather than realistic. We identify a previously unrecognized Wittenberg astronomer, Edo Hildericus (Hilderich von Varel), who presents a detailed exposition of Copernicus’s cosmology that is incompatible with instrumentalism. Quotations from other sixteenth century astronomers show that knowledge of the real configuration of the heavens was unattainable practically, rather than in principle. Astronomy was limited to quia demonstrations, although demonstration propter quid remained the ideal. We suggest that Oslander’s notorious preface to Copernicus expresses these sixteenth century commonplaces rather than twentieth century instrumentalism, and that neither ‘realism’, nor ‘instrumentalism’. in their modern meanings, apply to sixteenth century astronomy.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1063-6145
,
1530-9274
DOI:
10.1162/posc_a_00550
Language:
English
Publisher:
MIT Press
Publication Date:
1998
SSG:
24
SSG:
19,2
SSG:
5,1
Permalink