In:
Essays in Philosophy, Philosophy Documentation Center, Vol. 13, No. 1 ( 2012), p. 257-284
Abstract:
The practice of appealing to intuitive judgments concerning esoteric cases, long standard in analytic philosophy, has recently fallen on hard times. Various recent empirical results have suggested that philosophers are not currently able to distinguish good intuitions from bad. This paper evaluates one possible type of approach to this problematic methodological situation: calibration. Both critiquing and building on an argument from Robert Cummins, the paper explores what possible avenues may exist for the calibration of philosophical intuitions. It is argued that no good options are currently available, but leaves open the real possibility of such a calibration in the future.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1526-0569
DOI:
10.5840/eip201213115
Language:
English
Publisher:
Philosophy Documentation Center
Publication Date:
2012
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2098189-2
SSG:
5,1
Permalink
