GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Quasi-truth and defective knowledge in science: a critical examination
    FapUNIFESP (SciELO) ; 2023
    In:  Manuscrito Vol. 46, No. 2 ( 2023), p. 122-155
    Details
    In: Manuscrito, FapUNIFESP (SciELO), Vol. 46, No. 2 ( 2023), p. 122-155
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2317-630X , 0100-6045
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.jd
    Language: English
    Publisher: FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2524791-8
    SSG: 7,36
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Logički relativizam kroz logičke kontekste
    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka ; 2021
    In:  European journal of analytic philosophy Vol. 17, No. 2 ( 2021-10-21), p. 5-28
    Details
    In: European journal of analytic philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka, Vol. 17, No. 2 ( 2021-10-21), p. 5-28
    Abstract: Zastupamo pristup logičkim kontekstima koji utemeljuju tvrdnju da je logika lokalna stvar: različiti konteksti zahtijevaju različitu logiku. Pristup je se temelji na razmišljanju o individuaciji konteksta i smatra da logika može biti konstitutivna za kontekst ili domenu primjene. Dodajemo naturalističku komponentu: različite domene su više od samo tehničkih zanimljivosti; Kako intuitistička matematika svjedoči, neki od različitih oblika zaključivanja u različitim područjima aktivno se provode kao legitimna područja istraživanja u sadašnjoj matematici, pa, osim ako je netko spreman revidirati sadašnju znanstvenu praksu, generalizam se mora napustiti. Ovaj pristup se brani kroz raspravu nekih komponenti sličnog argumenta kojeg zastupa Shapiro, u kontekstu shvaćanja logike kao modela. Kako bi se naše gledište učinilo privlačnijim, slijedimo naturalističku verziju pristupa logici kao modelu i približavamo logiku kako se modeli koriste u znanostima.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1849-0514 , 1845-8475
    URL: Journal
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.31820/ejap
    DOI: 10.31820/ejap.17.2.2
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences University of Rijeka
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2690851-7
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    On Physics, Metaphysics, and Metametaphysics
    Wiley ; 2021
    In:  Metaphilosophy Vol. 52, No. 2 ( 2021-04), p. 175-199
    Details
    In: Metaphilosophy, Wiley, Vol. 52, No. 2 ( 2021-04), p. 175-199
    Abstract: Nonrelativistic quantum mechanics (QM) works perfectly well for all practical purposes. Once one admits, however, that a successful scientific theory is supposed not only to make predictions but also to tell us a story about the world in which we live, a philosophical problem emerges: in the specific case of QM, it is not possible to associate with the theory a unique scientific image of the world; there are several images. The fact that the theory may be compatible with distinct ontologies, and that those ontologies may themselves be associated with a plurality of metaphysical approaches, gives rise to the problem of metaphysical underdetermination. This paper concludes that the available metametaphysical criteria fail to deliver objectivity in theory choice, and it puts forward its own criterion based on a tension between two methods of metaphysical inquiry: one that is closely related to science and another that is not.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0026-1068 , 1467-9973
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/meta.v52.2
    DOI: 10.1111/meta.12486
    RVK:
    CA 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002019-3
    SSG: 5,1
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Interpreting philosophical interpretations of paraconsistency
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2022
    In:  Synthese Vol. 200, No. 6 ( 2022-10-30)
    Details
    In: Synthese, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 200, No. 6 ( 2022-10-30)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1573-0964
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03941-2
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 204075-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2012638-4
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    spectrum of metametaphysics : Mapping the state of art in scientific metaphysics
    EDIPUCRS ; 2021
    In:  Veritas (Porto Alegre) Vol. 66, No. 1 ( 2021-12-27), p. e41217-
    Details
    In: Veritas (Porto Alegre), EDIPUCRS, Vol. 66, No. 1 ( 2021-12-27), p. e41217-
    Abstract: Scientific realism is typically associated with metaphysics. One current incarnation of such an association concerns the requirement of a metaphysical characterization of the entities one is being a realist about. This is sometimes called “Chakravartty’s Challenge”, and codifies the claim that without a metaphysical characterization, one does not have a clear picture of the realistic commitments one is engaged with. The required connection between metaphysics and science naturally raises the question of whether such a demand is appropriately fulfilled, and how metaphysics engages with science in order to produce what is called “scientific metaphysics”. Here, we map some of the options available in the literature, generating a conceptual spectrum according to how each view approximates science and metaphysics. This is done with the purpose of enlightening the current debate on the possibility of epistemic warrant that science could grant to such a metaphysics, and how different positions differently address the thorny issue concerning such a warrant.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1984-6746 , 0042-3955
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.15448/1984-6746.2021.1
    DOI: 10.15448/1984-6746.2021.1.41217
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: EDIPUCRS
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2394034-7
    SSG: 1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    The epistemic value of metaphysics
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2022
    In:  Synthese Vol. 200, No. 4 ( 2022-08-08)
    Details
    In: Synthese, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 200, No. 4 ( 2022-08-08)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1573-0964
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1007/s11229-022-03833-5
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 204075-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2012638-4
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Understanding Logical Evidence, With Lessons From The Paradoxes
    Philosophy Documentation Center ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Philosophical Research Vol. 47 ( 2022), p. 177-194
    Details
    In: Journal of Philosophical Research, Philosophy Documentation Center, Vol. 47 ( 2022), p. 177-194
    Abstract: In this paper, I discuss the relation between logical theory and evidence in the context of an anti-exceptionalist approach to logic. I hold not only that current versions of anti-exceptionalism failed to appreciate the fact that logical evidence is theory laden, but also that benefits for the view are expected when we engage with the appropriate philosophy of science. I make the discussion more vivid by considering the cases of both the Liar and Russell paradoxes, and disputes between the classical and dialetheist approaches to them. Disputes between these parties involve different understandings of the logical terminology involved in the evidence (the paradoxes), and they illustrate how the data gets contaminated with theory. As a result of the discussion, I conclude that pragmatical considerations are better guides to evaluate disputes in such cases, with scientific fertility being the criterion of legitimacy for a logical system.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1053-8364
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.5840/jpr202291187
    Language: English
    Publisher: Philosophy Documentation Center
    Publication Date: 2022
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...