GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Wiley  (3)
  • Linguistics  (3)
Material
Publisher
  • Wiley  (3)
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
FID
  • Linguistics  (3)
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Seeking beyond with IntegraL : A user study of sense‐making enabled by anchor‐based virtual integration of library systems
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol. 64, No. 9 ( 2013-09), p. 1927-1945
    Details
    In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Wiley, Vol. 64, No. 9 ( 2013-09), p. 1927-1945
    Abstract: This article presents a user study showing the effectiveness of a linked‐based, virtual integration infrastructure that gives users access to relevant online resources, empowering them to design an information‐seeking path that is specifically relevant to their context. IntegraL provides a lightweight approach to improve and augment search functionality by dynamically generating context‐focused “anchors” for recognized elements of interest generated by library services. This article includes a description of how IntegraL 's design supports users' information‐seeking behavior. A full user study with both objective and subjective measures of IntegraL and hypothesis testing regarding IntegraL 's effectiveness of the user's information‐seeking experience are described along with data analysis, implications arising from this kind of virtual integration, and possible future directions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1532-2882 , 1532-2890
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.2013.64.issue-9
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22904
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2756770-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2755710-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052781-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2038742-8
    SSG: 24,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Understanding the evolution of multiple scientific research domains using a content and network approach
    Wiley ; 2013
    In:  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol. 64, No. 5 ( 2013-05), p. 1065-1075
    Details
    In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Wiley, Vol. 64, No. 5 ( 2013-05), p. 1065-1075
    Abstract: Interdisciplinary research has been attracting more attention in recent decades. In this article, we compare the similarity between scientific research domains and quantifying the temporal similarities of domains. We narrowed our study to three research domains: information retrieval ( IR ), database ( DB ), and W orld W ide W eb ( W 3), because the rapid development of the W3 domain substantially attracted research efforts from both IR and DB domains and introduced new research questions to these two areas. Most existing approaches either employed a content‐based technique or a cocitation or coauthorship network‐based technique to study the development trend of a research area. In this work, we proposed an effective way to quantify the similarities among different research domains by incorporating content similarity and coauthorship network similarity. Experimental results on DBLP (DataBase systems and Logic Programming) data related to IR , DB , and W 3 domains showed that the W 3 domain was getting closer to both IR and DB whereas the distance between IR and DB remained relatively constant. In addition, comparing to IR and W 3 with the DB domain, the DB domain was more conservative and evolved relatively slower.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1532-2882 , 1532-2890
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.2013.64.issue-5
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.22813
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2756770-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2755710-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2052781-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2038742-8
    SSG: 24,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Contrasting off‐line segmentation decisions with on‐line word segmentation during reading
    Wiley ; 2021
    In:  British Journal of Psychology Vol. 112, No. 3 ( 2021-08), p. 662-689
    Details
    In: British Journal of Psychology, Wiley, Vol. 112, No. 3 ( 2021-08), p. 662-689
    Abstract: In two experiments, we investigated the correspondences between off‐line word segmentation and on‐line segmentation processing during Chinese reading. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to read sentences which contained critical four‐character strings, and then, they were required to segment the same sentences into words in a later off‐line word segmentation task. For each item, participants were split into 1‐word segmenters (who segmented four‐character strings as a single word) and 2‐word segmenters (who segmented four‐character strings as 2 two‐character words). Thus, we split participants into two groups (1‐word segmenters and 2‐word segmenters) according to their off‐line segmentation bias. The data analysis showed no reliable group effect on all the measures. In order to avoid the heterogeneity of participants and stimuli in Experiment 1, two groups of participants (1‐word segmenters and 2‐word segmenters) and three types of critical four‐character string (1‐word strings, ambiguous strings, and 2‐word strings) were identified in a norming study in Experiment 2. Participants were required to read sentences containing these critical strings. There was no reliable group effect in Experiment 2, as was the case in Experiment 1. However, in Experiment 2, participants spent less time and made fewer fixations on 1‐word strings compared to ambiguous and 2‐word strings. These results indicate that the off‐line word segmentation preferences do not necessarily reflect on‐line word segmentation processing during Chinese reading and that Chinese readers exhibit flexibility such that word, or multiple constituent, segmentation commitments are made on‐line.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-1269 , 2044-8295
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/bjop.v112.3
    DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12482
    RVK:
    CL 1000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1493663-X
    SSG: 5,2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...