In:
Cognitive Science, Wiley, Vol. 42, No. 6 ( 2018-08), p. 1777-1832
Abstract:
ICAP is a theory of active learning that differentiates students’ engagement based on their behaviors. ICAP postulates that I nteractive engagement, demonstrated by co‐generative collaborative behaviors, is superior for learning to C onstructive engagement, indicated by generative behaviors. Both kinds of engagement exceed the benefits of A ctive or P assive engagement, marked by manipulative and attentive behaviors, respectively. This paper discusses a 5‐year project that attempted to translate ICAP into a theory of instruction using five successive measures: (a) teachers’ understanding of ICAP after completing an online module, (b) their success at designing lesson plans using different ICAP modes, (c) fidelity of teachers’ classroom implementation, (d) modes of students’ enacted behaviors, and (e) students’ learning outcomes. Although teachers had minimal success in designing Constructive and Interactive activities, students nevertheless learned significantly more in the context of Constructive than Active activities. We discuss reasons for teachers’ overall difficulty in designing and eliciting Interactive engagement.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0364-0213
,
1551-6709
DOI:
10.1111/cogs.2018.42.issue-6
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2018
detail.hit.zdb_id:
282371-8
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2002940-8
SSG:
25
SSG:
5,2
SSG:
7,11
Permalink
