GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • History  (1)
  • PHILOS  (1)
Material
Person/Organisation
Language
Years
FID
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2019
    In:  Philosophy of Science Vol. 86, No. 5 ( 2019-12), p. 1111-1122
    In: Philosophy of Science, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 86, No. 5 ( 2019-12), p. 1111-1122
    Abstract: This article focuses on recent discussions about holobionts and evolutionary individuality to evaluate the merits of integrative pluralism. I argue that integrative pluralism is the wrong approach to take when it comes to holobiont research because integrative pluralism is not liberal enough to accommodate both single-species and multispecies individuals. I conclude by suggesting two points. First, a pluralistic view helps us better understand holobiont research. Second, the case of holobionts helps us develop a better account of scientific pluralism.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0031-8248 , 1539-767X
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2066891-0
    SSG: 11
    SSG: 19,2
    SSG: 5,1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...