GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Online Resource  (1)
  • Li, Guoxin  (1)
  • Asia - CrossAsia  (1)
Material
  • Online Resource  (1)
Language
Years
FID
  • Asia - CrossAsia  (1)
  • 1
    In: Chinese Medical Journal, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 135, No. 8 ( 2021-10-26), p. 950-961
    Abstract: Previous studies have revealed that diabetes mellitus (DM) promotes disease progress of gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to further investigating whether DM advanced lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis in GC. Methods: The clinicopathologic data of GC patients with 〉 15 examined LN (ELN) between October 2004 and December 2019 from a prospectively maintained database were included. The observational outcomes included the number (N3b status) and anatomical distribution (N3 stations) of metastatic LN (MLN). Results: A total of 2142 eligible patients were included in the study between October 2004 and December 2019. N3 stations metastasis (26.8% in DM vs. 19.3% in non-DM, P   =  0.026) and N3b status (18.8% in DM vs. 12.8% in non-DM, P   =  0.039) were more advanced in the DM group, and multivariate logistic regression analyses confirmed that DM was an independent factor of developing N3 stations metastasis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.771, P   =  0.011) and N3b status (OR = 1.752, P   =  0.028). Also, multivariate analyses determined DM was independently associated with more MLN (β = 1.424, P   =  0.047). The preponderance of N3 stations metastasis (DM vs. non-DM, T1–2: 2.2% vs. 4.9%, T3: 29.0% vs. 20.3%, T4a: 38.9% vs. 25.8%, T4b: 50.0% vs. 36.6%; ELN16–29: 8.6% vs. 10.4%, ELN30–44: 27.9% vs. 20.5%, ELN ≥ 45: 37.7% vs. 25.3%), N3b status (DM vs. non-DM, T1–2: 0% vs. 1.7%, T3: 16.1% vs. 5.1%, T4a: 27.8% vs. 19.1%, T4b: 44.0% vs. 28.0%; ELN16–29: 8.6% vs. 7.9%, ELN30–44: 18.0% vs. 11.8%, ELN ≥ 45: 26.4% vs. 17.3%), and the number of MLN (DM vs. non-DM, T1–2: 0.4 vs. 1.1, T3: 8.6 vs. 5.2, T4a: 9.7 vs. 8.6, T4b: 17.0 vs. 12.8; ELN16–29: 3.6 vs. 4.6, ELN30–44: 5.8 vs. 5.5, ELN ≥ 45: 12.0 vs. 7.7) of DM group increased with the advancement of primary tumor depth stage and raising of ELN. Conclusions: DM was an independent risk factor for promoting LN metastasis. The preponderance of LN involvement in the DM group was aggravated with the advancement of tumor depth.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0366-6999 , 2542-5641
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2108782-9
    SSG: 6,25
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...