ISSN:
1573-5036
Keywords:
architecture
;
model
;
root map
;
root profile
;
root system
;
soil bulk density
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
Notes:
Abstract Differences between observed and simulated vertical root maps were studied in an attempt to evaluate the predictive ability of a simulation model of root system architecture under field conditions on mature plants, and to identify avenues for improvement. Some methodological problems associated with root mapping in the field are considered with a sensitivity analysis. Comparisons were made on a maize crop (early maturing hybrid F1 cultivar ‘Dea’) 15 days after silking. Four vertical root maps, perpendicular to the row and midway between two successive plants, were observed. Simulated root maps for different locations along the row showed essentially the same pattern, attesting of an approximately two-dimensional distribution of the roots in such a crop. Simulation of the intesection of roots with thin layers (thickness from 0 to 20 mm) instead of a perfect plane allowed us to assess effects due to the roughness of actual trench walls, and possible artefacts in the observation of root intersections. The simulated root profiles were very sensitive to this thickness, especially in the 0–5 mm range, in both average values, and overall shape. Actual data were close to the 3 mm thick simulations. This value seems plausible under our field conditions. Differences between simulated and actual root maps were shown to be mostly accounted for by the variations in soil bulk density. Thus, this environmental parameter appears as the most important one to include into the model for improving its predictions.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00029063
Permalink
