GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Wiley  (2)
  • 2000-2004  (2)
Material
Publisher
  • Wiley  (2)
Language
Years
  • 2000-2004  (2)
Year
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2001
    In:  Soil Science Society of America Journal Vol. 65, No. 5 ( 2001-09), p. 1516-1522
    In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Wiley, Vol. 65, No. 5 ( 2001-09), p. 1516-1522
    Abstract: The mapping of soil P concentration is necessary to assess the risk of P loss in runoff. We modeled the distribution of Mehlich‐3 extractable soil P (M3P) in an east‐central Pennsylvania 39.5‐ha watershed (FD‐36) with an average field size of 1.0 ha. Three interpolation models were used: (i) the field classification model—simple field means, (ii) the global model—ordinary kriging across the watershed, and (iii) the within‐field model—ordinary kriging within fields with a pooled within‐stratum variogram. Soils were sampled on a 30‐m grid, resulting in an average of 14 samples per field. Multiple validation runs were used to compare the models. Overall, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the models were 76, 71, and 66 mg kg −1 M3P for the field classification, global, and within‐field models, respectively. The field classification model performed substantially worse than did the kriging models in five fields; these fields exhibited strong spatial autocorrelation. The within‐field model performed substantially better than did the global model in three fields where autocorrelation was confined by the field boundary. However, no differences in P index classification were observed between the three prediction surfaces. The field classification model is simpler and less expensive to implement than the kriging models and should be adequate for applications that are not sensitive to small errors in soil P concentration estimates.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0361-5995 , 1435-0661
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 241415-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2239747-4
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 196788-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1481691-X
    SSG: 13
    SSG: 21
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2001
    In:  Journal of Phycology Vol. 37, No. s3 ( 2001-06), p. 12-12
    In: Journal of Phycology, Wiley, Vol. 37, No. s3 ( 2001-06), p. 12-12
    Abstract: Chopin, T. 1 , Yarish, C. 2 , Neefus, C. 3 , Kraemer, G. P. 4 , Belyea, E. 1 , Carmona, R. 2 , Saunders, G. W. 5 , Bates, C. 5 , Page, F. 6 & Dowd, M. 6 1 University of New Brunswick, Centre for Coastal Studies and Aquaculture and Centre for Environmental and Molecular Algal Research, P.O. Box 5050, Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L5, Canada; 2 University of Connecticut, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1 University Place, Stamford, Connecticut, 06901‐2315, USA; 3 University of New Hampshire, Department of Plant Biology, Office of Biometrics, G32 Spaulding Life Science Center, Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, USA; 4 State University of New York, Purchase College, Division of Natural Sciences, Purchase, New York, 10577, USA; 5 University of New Brunswick, Centre for Environmental and Molecular Algal Research, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5A3, Canada; 6 Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Biological Station, 531 Brandy Cove Road, St. Andrews, New Brunswick, E5B 2L9, Canada On a regional scale, finfish aquaculture can be one of the significant contributors to coastal nutrification. Contrary to common belief, even in regions of exceptional tidal and apparent “flushing” regimes like the Bay of Fundy, water mixing and transport may be limited and water residency time can be locally prolonged. Hence, nutrient bio‐availability remains significant for a relatively long period of time in some areas. Understanding the assimilative capacity of coastal ecosystems under cumulative pressure, then, becomes critical. To avoid pronounced shifts in coastal processes, conversion, not dilution, is the solution by integrating fed aquaculture (finfish) with organic and inorganic extractive aquaculture (shellfish and seaweed) so that the “ wastes” of one resource user become a resource for the others. Such a bioremediative approach provides mutual benefits to co‐cultured organisms, and economic diversification and increased profitability per cultivation unit for the aquaculture industry. These concepts will be discussed and illustrated by the results of our on‐going projects and we will demonstrate that seaweeds can also be excellent bio‐indicators of nutrification/eutrophication revealing symptoms of environmental stress and measuring the zone of influence of an aquaculture site. The aquaculture industry is here to stay in our “coastal scape”: it has its place in the global seafood supply and demand, and in the economy of coastal communities. To help ensure its sustainability, it needs, however, to responsibly change its too often monotrophic practices by adopting polytrophic ones to become better integrated into a broader coastal management framework.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3646 , 1529-8817
    URL: Issue
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2001
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 281226-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1478748-9
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...