Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical recognition of queen cells by honey bee workersApis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae)

  • Research papers
  • Published:
CHEMOECOLOGY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Honey bee workers are able to nurse or to destroy and thus to recognize the capped queen cells containing a pupa. Fatty acid esters, especially methyl oleate, methyl palmitate and ethyl oleate were found in significant amounts on the queen pupal cuticle. Methyl oleate, the major component, along with smaller amounts of methyl linoleate and methyl linolenate, were involved in the recognition of queen cells by workers. In natural conditions of the colony, queen cells containing a paraffin pupal lure with methyl oleate were accepted 5.9 days by workers, releasing about 1.8 queen pupa equivalents during that period, when control cells (without ester) were kept only 2.1 days. Although these esters are non specific to honey bees, they are of great importance in social regulation of the honey bee colony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergström G, Löfqvist J (1970) Chemical basis for odour communication in four species ofLasius ants. J Insect Physiol 16:2353–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassier P, Lansky Y (1992) Structure et rôle social de quelques glandes exocrines à sécrétion phéromonale chez l'abeille domestiqueApis mellifera L (Hymenoptera: Apididae). Ann Biol 2:61–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1967) Factors determining the collection of pollen by the honeybee foragers. Anim Behav 15:134–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Free JB, Williams IH (1975) The effect on the foraging behaviour of honeybees of the relative locations of the hive entrance and brood combs. Appl Anim Ethol 2:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free JB, Winder ME (1983) Brood recognition by honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers. Anim Behav 31:539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB, Ferguson AW, Simpkins JR (1989) The effect of different periods of brood isolation on subsequent brood-cell visits by workers honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). J Apic Res 28:22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang ZY, Otis GW (1991) Inspection and feeding of larvae by worker honey bees: effects of starvation and food quantity. J Insect Behav 4:305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay SC (1963) The development of honeybees in their cells. J Apic Res 2:117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeniger N (1978) Das Wärmen der Brut bei der Honigbiene. Apidologie 9:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeniger N, Veith HJ (1983) Glyceryl-1,2-dioleate-3-palmitate, a brood pheromone of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Experientia 39:1051–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte Y (1990) Contribution à l'étude des relations Abeilles-Varroas: approches comportementale, chimique, et génétique. Thesis, Université de Paris XI, Orsay, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte Y, Arnold G, Trouiller J, Masson C, Chappe B, Ourisson G (1989) Attraction of the parasitic miteVarroa to the drone larvae of honey bees by simple aliphatic esters. Science 245:638–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte Y, Arnold G, Trouiller J, Masson C, Chappe B (1990) Identification of a brood pheromone in honey bees. Naturwissenschaften 77:334–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte Y, Sreng L, Trouiller J, Poitout S (1993) Method for altering worker bee behaviour with brood pheromones. Patient WO 93/25070

  • Lensky Y, Slabezki Y (1981) The inhibitory effect of the queen bee (Apis mellifera L.) footprint pheromone on the construction of swarming queen cups. J Insect Physiol 27:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myser WC (1952) Ingestion of eggs by honey bee workers. Am Bee J 92:67

    Google Scholar 

  • Page RE, Erickson EH (1984) Selective rearing of queens by worker honey bees: kin or nestmates recognition. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77:578–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain J (1961) Sur la phéromone des reines d'abeilles et ses effets physiologiques. Ann Abeille 4:73–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Post DC, Mohamed MA, Coppel HC, Jeanne RL (1984) Identification of ant repellent allomone produced by social waspPolistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Chem Ecol 12:1425–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickli M, Guerin PM, Diehl PA (1992) Palmitic acid released from honeybee worker larvae attracts the parasitic miteVarroa jacobsoni on a servosphere. Naturwissenschaften 79:320–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. (1985) SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5, Cary, SAS Institute Inc. N.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato M, Kuwahara Y, Matsuyama S, Suzuki T (1993) Chemical ecology of astigmatid mites XXXVII. Fatty acid as food attractant of astigmatid mites, its scope and limitation. Appl Entomol Zool 28:565–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiery D, Le Quere JL (1991) Identification of an deterring pheromone in the eggs of the European corn borer. Naturwissenschaften 78:132–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiery D, Gabel B, Farkas P, Pronier V (1992) Identification of an oviposition-regulating pheromone in the European grapeline moth,Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Experientia 48:697–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouiller J (1993) La communication chimique inter- et intra-specifique chez l'abeille. Thesis, Université de Paris VII, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouiller J, Arnold G, Le Conte Y, Masson C, Chappe B (1991) Temporal pheromonal and kairomonal secretion in the brood of honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 78:368–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trouiller J, Arnold G, Chappe B, Le Conte Y, Masson C (1992) Semiochemical basis of the infestation of honey bee brood byVarroa jacobsoni. J Chem Ecol 11:2041–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson SB, Frankie GW, Blum MS, Wheeler JW (1978) Isolation, identification, and function of the Dufour gland secretion ofXylocopa virginica texana. J Chem Ecol 4:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher PK (1986) Kinship discrimination in queen rearing by honey bees (Apis mellifera). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuillaume M (1959) Nouvelles données sur la psychophysiologie de l'élevage des reines chezApis mellifica. Ann Abeille 2:113–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML, Slessor KN, Willis LG, Naumann K, Higo HA, Wyborn MH, Kaminsky LA (1989) The influence of the queen mandibular pheromones on worker attraction to swarm clusters and inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes Soc 36:15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston ML, Higo HA, Slessor KN (1990) Effect of various dosages of queen mandibular gland pheromone on the inhibition of queen rearing in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:234–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conte, Y.L., Sreng, L., Sacher, N. et al. Chemical recognition of queen cells by honey bee workersApis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Chemoecology 5, 6–12 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259967

Key words

Navigation