Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Matsuoka, Atsushi; Juhls, Bennet; Bécu, Guislain; Oziel, Laurent; Leymarie, Edouard; Lizotte, Martine; Ferland, Joannie; Doxaran, David; Maury, Juliette; Babin, Marcel (2021): Remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) of the surface water of the Mackenzie Delta Region during 4 expeditions from spring to fall in 2019 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.937583, In: Juhls, Bennet; Lizotte, Martine; Matsuoka, Atsushi; Mével, Gaëlle; Bécu, Guislain; Overduin, Pier Paul; Devred, Emmanuel; Doxaran, David; Ferland, Joannie; Forget, Marie-Hélène; Hilborn, Andrea; Leymarie, Edouard; Maury, Juliette; Oziel, Laurent; Tisserand, Lucas; Miles, Dillon; Anikina, David Obie James; Guilmette, Caroline; Béguin, Marine; Couture, Raoul-Marie; Bossé-Demers, Thomas; Laberge-Carignan, Audrey; Chaillou, Gwénaëlle; Bélanger, Simon; Bruyant, Flavienne; Babin, Marcel (2021): Hydrographical, biogeochemical and biooptical water properties in the Mackenzie Delta Region during 4 expeditions from spring to fall in 2019 [dataset bundled publication]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.937587

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Vertical profiles of downwelling irradiance (Ed) and upwelling radiance (Lu) were measured during legs 2, 3, and 4 using a Compact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS) in an ICE-Pro frame from Biospherical Instruments, Inc. (for a detailed description see Morrow et al. 2010 (see further details)). Additionally, above-surface incident downward irradiance (Es(0+)) was measured at about two meters above sea level and was used to correct in-water Ed and Lu for changes in the incident light field during Lu profiling (Zibordi et al., 2019; doi:10.25607/OBP-691). All radiometric quantities were measured at 19 wavelengths spanning from 380 to 875 nm. In-water profiles were obtained from the boat using a 3 m long pole, deployed towards the sun to avoid shading from the boat. The data that were acquired with a tilt of more than 5 degrees were discarded (Hooker et al., 2013; doi:10.5194/bg-10-4511-2013). Due to the high absorption and scattering coefficients in the sampled waters and considering relatively large dimensions of the ICE-Pro, self-shading correction was not negligible. Absorption observed in the present study were mostly outside the limits examined by Gordon and Ding (1992; doi:10.4319/lo.1992.37.3.0491), suggesting the application of the correction questionable. To overcome this issue, we performed Monte-Carlo simulations using the SimulO software (Leymarie et al., 2010; doi:10.1364/AO.49.005415) for examining the self-shading correction factor on Lu at null depth (Gerbi et al., 2016 (doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0067.1); Leymarie et al., 2018 (doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00437)). The exact dimensions of the ICE-Pro were simulated and virtually placed at a depth of 0.5 m. A wide range of IOPs was considered to cover the conditions encountered in the field. The simulations provide a robust relationship between the computed self-shading and the quantity x = a + bb, where a is the total measured absorption coefficient (i.e., the contributions of pure water, CDOM, algal and non-algal particles) and bb is the total backscattering coefficient (i.e., the contributions of water molecules and particles). The shade-corrected upwelling radiance (Lu corrected) can be expressed as a function of the measured radiance (Lu measured) as: (1) L_u(corrected)=(L_u(measured))/((1-ε)), (2) ε=1-e^(-0.14*(a+bb)), where (2) is fitted for solar zenith angles > 45° and bb (which was not measured in the field) was calculated using an empirical relationship from the Malina-cruise dataset (Doxaran et al., 2012 (doi:10.5194/bg-9-3213-2012); Massicotte et al., 2020 (doi:10.5194/essd-13-1561-2021)). Subsurface downward irradiance and upward radiance Ed(0-) and Lu(0-) were estimated with an iterative linear fitting of the log-transformed Ed(z) and Lu(z) vs depth z. Fitting was applied to successively greater depths until the correlation coefficient (r2) exceeded 0.99 or until the layer thickness reached 2.5 m (Bélanger et al., 2017; doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0176.1). Remote Sensing Reflectance (Rrs) was calculated following Mobley (1999; doi:10.1364/AO.38.007442) with: Rrs(λ)=(0.54*L_u (0^-,λ))/(E_s(0^+,λ)). To calculate the Rrs we used the R "Cops" package (https://github.com/belasi01/Cops) (Bélanger 2017: doi:10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0176.1).
Keyword(s):
biogeochemistry; Biooptics; Coastal waters; hydrographic data; Mackenzie
Related to:
Juhls, Bennet; Matsuoka, Atsushi; Lizotte, Martine; Mével, Gaëlle; Bécu, Guislain; Overduin, Pier Paul; El-Kassar, Jan; Devred, Emmanuel; Doxaran, David; Ferland, Joannie; Forget, Marie-Hélène; Hilborn, Andrea; Leymarie, Edouard; Maury, Juliette; Oziel, Laurent; Tisserand, Lucas; Babin, Marcel (accepted): Seasonal dynamics of dissolved organic matter of the Mackenzie Delta, Canadian Arctic waters: implications for ocean colour remote sensing.
Further details:
Morrow, John H; Hooker, Stanford B; Booth, C R; Bernhard, Germar; Lind, Randall N; Brown, lames W (2010): Advances in Measuring the Apparent Optical Properties (AOPs) of Optically Complex Waters. NASA Center for AeroSpace Information, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20110008342/downloads/20110008342.pdf
Funding:
Horizon 2020 (H2020), grant/award no. 773421: NUNATARYUK, Permafrost thaw and the changing Arctic coast, science for socioeconomic adaptation
Coverage:
Median Latitude: 69.101251 * Median Longitude: -134.991317 * South-bound Latitude: 68.264050 * West-bound Longitude: -138.135120 * North-bound Latitude: 69.648520 * East-bound Longitude: -133.031410
Date/Time Start: 2019-04-20T15:34:00 * Date/Time End: 2019-09-08T12:00:00
Event(s):
NunaWP4Mackenzie19_1_STN0a (1_STN0a) * Latitude: 68.504830 * Longitude: -134.147960 * Date/Time: 2019-04-20T15:34:00 * Location: Mackenzie Delta, Canada * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
NunaWP4Mackenzie19_1_STN0b (1_STN0b) * Latitude: 68.319030 * Longitude: -133.678190 * Date/Time: 2019-04-20T20:49:00 * Location: Mackenzie Delta, Canada * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
NunaWP4Mackenzie19_1_STN01 (1_STN01) * Latitude: 68.318910 * Longitude: -133.677500 * Date/Time: 2019-04-23T19:48:00 * Location: Mackenzie Delta, Canada * Method/Device: Multiple investigations (MULT)
Comment:
Empty cells = NA
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1Event labelEventJuhls, Bennet
2Cruise/expeditionExpeditionJuhls, Bennet
3LATITUDELatitudeJuhls, BennetGeocode
4LONGITUDELongitudeJuhls, BennetGeocode
5DATE/TIMEDate/TimeJuhls, BennetGeocode
6Station labelStationJuhls, Bennet
7Remote sensing reflectance at 395 nmRrs_3951/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
8Remote sensing reflectance at 412 nmRrs_4121/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
9Remote sensing reflectance at 443 nmRrs_4431/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
10Remote sensing reflectance at 490 nmRrs_4901/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
11Remote sensing reflectance at 510 nmRrs_5101/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
12Remote sensing reflectance at 560 nmRrs_5601/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
13Remote sensing reflectance at 665 nmRrs_6651/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
14Remote sensing reflectance at 683 nmRrs_6831/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
15Remote sensing reflectance at 710 nmRrs_7101/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
16Remote sensing reflectance at 765 nmRrs_7651/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
17Remote sensing reflectance at 778 nmRrs_7781/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
18Remote sensing reflectance at 865 nmRrs_8651/srJuhls, BennetCompact-Optical Profiling System (C-OPS), ICE-Pro frame (Biospherical Instruments, Inc.)calculated and corrected (see Belanger et al., 2017)
Status:
Curation Level: Enhanced curation (CurationLevelC)
Size:
856 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML