Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonnestmate kin recognition in the antLeptothorax lichtensteini: Evidence that genetic factors regulate colony recognition

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young monogynous colonies ofLeptothorax lichtensteini showed completely unagressive behavior toward unfamiliar kin-related workers which were experimentally introduced into their nest, whereas they were much more hostile toward nonrelated workers (42% of which were rejected). During the first 30 min of observation, related intruders received significantly more licking and participated in a significantly greater number of trophallactic exchanges than nonrelated ones. These experiments show clearly that genetically determined chemical cues are involved in colony recognition. The mechanisms whereby these factors contribute to kin recognition are discussed, and it is concluded that phenotype matching may be the main process involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. D. (1979).Darwinism and Human Affairs, University of Washington Press.

  • Bateson, P. P. G. (1980). Optimal outbreeding and the development of sexual preferences in Japanese quail.Z. Tierpsychol. 53:231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatkar, A. P. (1979). Trophallactic appeasement in ants from distant colonies.Folia Entomol. Mex. 41:135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein, A. R. (1983). Kin recognition mechanism: Phenotypic matching or recognition alleles?Am. Nat. 121:749–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonavita-Cougourdan, A., Clément, J. L., and Lange C. (1987). Nestmate recognition: The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in the antCamponotus vagus Scop.J. Entomol. Sci. 22:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonavita-Cougourdan, A., Clément, J. L., and Lange, C. (1988). Reconnaissance des larves chez la fourmiCamponotus vagus Scop. Phénotypes larvaires des spectres d'hydrocarbures cuticulaires.C.R. Acad. Sci. 306:299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breed, M. D., and Bennett, B. (1987): Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 243–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, N. F. (1988). Species, kin and other forms of recognition in the brood discrimination behavior of ants. In Trager, J. C. (ed.),Advances in Myrmecology, pp. 267–295.

  • Carlin, N. F., and Hölldobler, B. (1983). Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants.Science 222:1027–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, N. F., and Hölldobler, B. (1987). The kin recognition system of Carpenter ants (Camponotus spp). II. Larger colonies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20:209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, N. F., and Hölldobler, B. (1988). Influence of virgin queens on kin recognition in the Carpenter antCamponotus floridanus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ins. Soc. 35:191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, R. H. (1987). Genetic aspects of kin recognition: Concepts, models, and synthesis. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C.D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A., and Passera, L. (1974). Ponte des ouvrières et inhibition royale chez la FourmiTemnothorax recedens (Nyl) (Formicidae: Myrmicinae).Ins. Soc. 21:343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vroey, C., and Pasteels, J. M. (1978). Agonistic behaviour ofMyrmica rubra.Ins. Soc. 25:247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errard, C. (1984). Influence des stimulations sociales précoces, sur l'intégration sociale de l'adulte deCamponotus abdominalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In de Haro, A., and Espadaler, X. (eds.),Processus d'acquisition précoce. Les Communications, Universitaria Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errard, C., Bagneres, A. G., and Clément, J. L. (1989). Les signaux chimiques de la reconnaissance interspecifique chez les fourmis.Actes Coll. Ins. Soc. 5:285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, D. J. C. (1987). The behavioral analysis of kin recognition: Perspectives on methodology and interpretation. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 19–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar, R. (1985). Kin recognition in Social Insects and other animals. A review of recent findings and a consideration of their relevance for the theory of kin selction.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 94:587–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa, G. J., Reeve, H. K., and Pfennig, D. W. (1986). The evolution and ontogeny of nestmate recognition in social wasps.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31:431–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa, G. J., Klahn, J. E., Parman, A. O., and Ryan, R. E. (1987). Discrimination between nestmate and non-nestmate kin by social wasps (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen, A. (1990). Do animals really recognize kin?Anim. Behav. 39:42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964a). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.J. Theoret. Biol. 7:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964b). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.J. Theoret. Biol. 7:17–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper, P. G. (1986). Kin recognition: Functions and mechanisms: A review.Biol. Rev. 61:63–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Carlin, N. F. (1987). Anonymity and specificity in the chemical communication signals of social insects.J. Comp. Physiol. A 161:567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. G., and Sherman, P. W. (1983). Kin recognition in animals.Am. Sci. 71:46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isingrini, M. (1987). La reconnaissance coloniale des larves chez la fourmiCataglyphis cursor (M,F).Ins. Soc. 34:20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, R. (1960). Uber die Futterweitergabezwischen Angehörigen verschiedener Waldameisenstaaten.Z. Tierpsychol. 17:389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Masne, G. (1952). Sur la fécondité des ouvrières de Fourmis. Discussion dans Bernard, F.Coll. Intern. CNRS 34:134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C. D., and Smith, B. H. (1987). Kin recognition in primitively eusocial insects. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 209–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzer, A., and Vinson, S. B. (1985). Kinship and incompatibility between colonies of the acacia antPseudomyrmex ferruginea.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17:75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, L., and Blum, M. S. (1988). Nestmate recognition in Camponotus floridanus callow worker ants: Are sisters or nestmates recognized?Anim. Behav. 36:718–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig, D. W., Gamboa, G. J., Reeve, H. K., Shellman Reeve, J., and Fergusson, I. D. (1983). The mechanism of nestmate discrimination in social wasps (Polistes, Hymenoptera: Vespidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13:299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plateaux, L. (1970). Sur le polymorphisme social de la fourmiLeptothorax nylanderi (Förster). I. Morphologie et biologie comparées des castes.Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Ser. 12:373–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plateaux, L. (1978). L'essaimage de quelques fourmisLeptothorax: Rôles de l'éclairement et de divers autres facteurs. Effet sur l'isolement reproductif et la répartition géographique.Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Biol. Ser. 20:129–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R. H. (1986). Kin recognition: A selective overview. In L. Passera, and Lachaud, J. P. (eds.),The Individual and Society, Privat Int. Ethol. Conf., Toulouse, pp. 37–47.

  • Porter, R. H. (1987). Kin recognition: Functions and mediating mechanisms. In Craxford, C., Smith, M., and Krebs, D. (eds.),Sociobiology and Psychology: Ideas, Issues, and Applications, London.

  • Provost, E. (1980a). La fermeture des sociétés de Leptothorax (Hym. Formicidae). Corrélation entre les tests de transfert d'individus dans une société étrangère et les expériences de mise en présence de deux sociétés. Congr. UIEIS, Sénanque,Biol. Ecol. Médit. 7:207–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provost, E. (1980b).Etude de la fermeture de la société chex quelques espèces de fourmis, Thèse de 3ème cycle, Univ. Aix-Marseille II.

  • Provost, E. (1983). Une nouvelle méthode de marquage permettant l'identification des membres d'une société de fourmis.Ins. Soc. 30:255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provost, E. (1985). Etude de la fermeture de la société chez les fourmis I. Analyse des interactions entre ouvrières de sociétés différentes, lors de rencontres expérimentales, chez des fourmis du genreLeptothorax et chezCamponotus lateralis Ol.Ins. Soc. 32:445–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provost, E. (1989). Social environmental factors influencing mutual recognition of individuals in the antLeptothorax lichtensteini Bondr. (Mymenoptera: Formicidae).Behav. Proc. 18:35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, P. W., and Holmes, W. G. (1985). Kin recognition: Issues and evidences. Experimental behavioural ecology and sociobiology. In Hölldobler, B., and Lindauer, M. (eds.),Fortschritte der Zoologie, Vol. 31, pp. 437–460.

  • Stuart, R. J. (1987). Individual workers produce colony-specific nestmate recognition cues in the ant,Leptothorax curvispinosus.Anim. Behav. 35:1062–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, B. (1987). Mechanisms of kin recognition.J. Theor. Biol. 128:159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1971).The Insect Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Eric Provost

    Present address: CNRS UPR 27 LNB 8, Communication Chimique, 31 Ch. J. Aiguier, 13402, Marseille Cedex 9, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNRS Equipe d'Ethologie UPR 38, 31 Ch. J. Aiguier, 13402, Marseille Cedex 9, France

    Eric Provost

Authors
  1. Eric Provost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Provost, E. Nonnestmate kin recognition in the antLeptothorax lichtensteini: Evidence that genetic factors regulate colony recognition. Behav Genet 21, 151–167 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066333

Key Words

Search

Navigation