Skip to main content
Log in

A Superposed Model for the Pipe Failure Assessment of Water Distribution Networks and Uncertainty Analysis: A Case Study

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pipe failure often occurs in water distribution networks (WDNs) and results in high levels of water loss and socio-economic damage. Physical-based, statistical and data-driven models have been developed to estimate pipe failure rates (failures per km of pipe per year) to efficiently manage water losses from WDNs and to ensure safe operations. Due to the complexities of pipe failure patterns, we develop a superposed statistical model to depict the relationship between pipe failure rate and pipe age. The model’s level of uncertainty was then quantified by simulating pipe failures as Poisson numbers. Part of Beijing’s WDN is taken as a study case, and pipe failure data for a 4-year period, as well as pipe properties, are collected to develop the pipe failure model. The case study results show that the pipe failure rates vary with time in a non-monotonic manner and that the proposed model captures pipe failure behaviour with an R2 value of 0.95. A 95% confidence interval of modelled pipe failures for each pipe age group is used to describe the uncertainty level of the model. We find that 88% of the observations fall under the 95% confidence interval. The established model could be applied to prioritize pipes with higher failure rates to optimize pipe replacement/rehabilitation strategies. Our uncertainty analysis of this model can help utility managers understand the model’s reliability and formulate reasonable WDN management plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreou SA, Marks DH, Clark RM (1987) A new methodology for modelling failure patterns in deteriorating water distribution systems: Theory. Adv Water Resour 10(1):2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo LS, Ramos H, Coelho ST (2006) Pressure control for leakage minimisation in water distribution systems management. Water Resour Manag 20(1):133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardi L, Kapelan Z, Giustolisi O, Savic D (2008) Development of pipe deterioration models for water distribution systems using EPR. J Hydroinf 10(3):113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantine AG, Darroch JN, Miller R (1996) Predicting underground pipe failure. Water (J Austra Water Assoc) 23(2):9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Haight FA (1967) Handbook of the Poisson distribution. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho CI, Lin MD, Lo SL (2010) Use of a GIS-based hybrid artificial neural network to prioritize the order of pipe replacement in a water distribution network. Environ Monit Assess 166(1):177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafar R, Shahrour I, Juran I (2010) Application of artificial neural networks (ANN) to model the failure of urban water mains. Math Comput Model 51(9–10):1170–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karadirek IE, Kara S, Yilmaz G, Muhammetoglu A, Muhammetoglu H (2012) Implementation of hydraulic modelling for water-loss reduction through pressure management. Water Resour Manag 26(9):2555–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettler AJ, Goulter IC (1985) An analysis of pipe failure age in urban water distribution networks. Can J Civ Eng 12(2):286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2001) Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models. Urban Water 3(3):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gat Y, Eisenbeis P (2000) Using maintenance records to forecast failures in water networks. Urban Water 2(3):173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZJ, Chen QW, Xu Q, Blanckaert K (2013) Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method in uncertainty analysis of numerical eutrophication models: Take BLOOM as an example. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/701923

  • Lindenschmidt KE, Fleischbein K, Baborowski M (2007) Structural uncertainty in a river water quality modelling system. Ecol Model 204(3):289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu YH, Huang ZJ, Zhang T (2013) Method and case study of quantitative uncertainty analysis in building energy consumption inventories. Energ Buildings 57:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mailhot A, Pelletier G, Noel JF, Villeneuve JP (2000) Modeling the evolution of the structural state of water pipe networks with brief recorded pipe failure histories: Methodology and application. Water Resour Res 36(10):3053–3062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannina G, Viviani G (2010) An urban drainage stormwater quality model: Model development and uncertainty quantification. J Hydrol 381(3–4):248–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulcini G (2001) Modeling the failure data of a repairable equipment with bathtub type failure intensity. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajani B, Kleiner Y (2001) Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: physically based models. Urban Water 3(3):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir U, Howard C (1979) An analytical approach to scheduling pipe replacement. J AWWA 71(5):248–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZY, Hong Q, Yu H, Liu RM (2008) Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Sci Total Environ 405(1):195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Adachi S (2013) Bathtub curves and pipe prioritization based on failure rate. Built Environ Proj Asset Manage 3(1):105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson TG, Christian CD, Mason AJ, Smith MH, Meyer R (2004) Bayesian-based pipe failure model. J Hydroinf 6(4):259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins DJ (2002) The bathtub curve and product failure behavior part one - The bathtub curve, infant mortality and burn-in. Reliab HotWire. No. 21. http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue21/hottopics21.htm

  • Xu Q, Chen QW, Li WF, Ma JF (2011) Pipe failure prediction based on evolutionary data-driven methods with brief recorded data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(8):942–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Chen QW, Ma JF, Blanckaert K (2013) Optimal pipe replacement strategy based on break rate prediction through genetic programming for water distribution network. J Hydro-environ Res 7:134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of People’s Republic of China (2017ZX07108-002) and by the Jiangsu Science Fund (BE2016617, GHB-HT-2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiuwen Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, Q., Qiang, Z., Chen, Q. et al. A Superposed Model for the Pipe Failure Assessment of Water Distribution Networks and Uncertainty Analysis: A Case Study. Water Resour Manage 32, 1713–1723 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1899-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1899-8

Keywords

Navigation