Abstract
Seasonal inflow variability, climate non-stationarity and climate change are matters of concern for water system planning and management. This study presents optimization methods for long-term planning of water systems in the context of a non-stationary climate with two levels of inflow variability: seasonal and inter-annual. Deterministic and stochastic optimization models with either one time-step (intra-annual) or two time-steps (intra-annual and inter-annual) were compared by using three water system optimization models. The first model used one time-step sampling stochastic dynamic programming (SSDP). The other models with two time-steps are long-term deterministic dynamic programming (LT-DDP) and long-term sampling stochastic dynamic programming (LT-SSDP). The study area is the Manicouagan water system located in Quebec, Canada. The results show that there will be an increase of inflow to hydropower plants in the future climate with an increase of inflow uncertainty. The stochastic optimization with two time-steps was the most suitable for handling climate non-stationarity. The LT-DDP performed better in terms of reservoir storage, release and system efficiency but with high uncertainty. The SSDP had the lowest performance. The SSDP was not able to deal with the non-stationary climate and seasonal variability at the same time. The LT-SSDP generated operating policies with smaller uncertainty compared to LT-DDP, and it was therefore a more appropriate approach for water system planning and management in a non-stationary climate characterized by high inflow variability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batista Celeste A, Suzuki K, Kadota A (2008) Integrating long- and short-term reservoir operation models via stochastic and deterministic optimization: case study in Japan. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134:440–448. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:5(440)
Côté P, Haguma D, Leconte R, Krau S (2011) Stochastic optimisation of hydro-Quebec hydropower installations: a statistical comparison between SDP and SSDP methods. Can J Civ Eng 38:1427–1434
Faber BA, Stedinger JR (2001) Reservoir optimization using sampling SDP with ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) forecasts. J Hydrol 249:113–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00419-X
Fiseha BM, Setegn SG, Melesse AM et al (2014) Impact of climate change on the hydrology of upper Tiber River basin using bias corrected regional climate model. Water Resour Manag 28:1327–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0546-x
Gaudard L, Gilli M, Romerio F (2013) Climate change impacts on hydropower management. Water Resour Manag 27:5143–5156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0458-1
Haguma D, Leconte R, Côté P et al (2014) Optimal hydropower generation under climate change conditions for a northern water resources system. Water Resour Manag 28(13):4631–4644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0763-3
Haguma D, Leconte R, Krau S et al (2015) Water resources optimization method in the context of climate change. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141:4014051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000445
Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (2012) Perception of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:E2415–E2423. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205276109
Hawkins E, Sutton R (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37:407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6
Karamouz M, Houck MH (1987) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operating rule generation. J Am Water Resour Assoc 23:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1987.tb00778.x
Kelman J, Stedinger JR, Cooper LA et al (1990) Sampling stochastic dynamic programming applied to reservoir operation. Water Resour Res 26:447–454. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i003p00447
Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M et al (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915
Minville M, Brissette F, Leconte R (2010) Impacts and uncertainty of climate change on water resource management of the Peribonka River system (Canada). J Water Resour Plan Manag 136:376–385. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000041
Nakićenović N, Davidson O, Davis G et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios (SRES), a special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rahman M, Bolisetti T, Balachandar R (2012) Hydrologic modelling to assess the climate change impacts in a southern Ontario watershed. Can J Civ Eng 39:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1139/l11-112
Salathé EP (2005) Downscaling simulations of future global climate with application to hydrologic modelling. Int J Climatol 25:419–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1125
Stedinger JR, Sule BF, Loucks DP (1984) Stochastic dynamic programming models for reservoir operation optimization. Water Resour Res 20:1499–1505. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i011p01499
Vicuna S, Dracup JA, Lund JR et al (2010) Basin-scale water system operations with uncertain future climate conditions: methodology and case studies. Water Resour Res 46:W04505. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007838
Widmann M, Bretherton CS, Salathé EP (2003) Statistical precipitation downscaling over the northwestern United States using numerically simulated precipitation as a predictor. J Clim 16:799–816. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0799:SPDOTN>2.0.CO;2
Zambelli M, Siqueira TG, Cicogna M, Soares S (2006) Deterministic versus stochastic models for long term hydrothermal scheduling. In: 2006 I.E. power engineering society general meeting. IEEE, p 7
Acknowledgments
The climate model data was provided by the Earth System Grid. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada’s Collaborative Research and Development program, OURANOS and Hydro-Québec funded this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haguma, D., Leconte, R. Long-Term Planning of Water Systems in the Context of Climate Non-Stationarity with Deterministic and Stochastic Optimization. Water Resour Manage 32, 1725–1739 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1900-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1900-6