Skip to main content
Log in

Amelioration and retrofitting of educational buildings

  • Special Section: Tenth Anniversary of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following a seismic event that occurred years ago in Central Italy, the public opinion was growing and growing a concern on the adequacy of educational buildings all across Italy. This activated several political decisions and a consequent technical effort is in progress. Technically speaking one has to manage the classical problem of retrofitting existing buildings. However, the legal environment goes across national codes, targeted guidelines and the professional need of achieving pragmatic solutions based on ethical and social acceptation schemes.This paper introduces the topic in its worldwide exception and focuses then on some operative aspects in the Italian situation. It outlines the consolidated steps along this technical process and emphasizes the weak aspects one meets when going across the designers’ reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Casciati F and Faravelli L (1991), Fragility Analysis of Complex Structural Systems, Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysostomou CZ, Kyriakides N, Kappos AJ, Georgiou E, Vasiliou O and Milis M (2012), “Seismic Retrofitting of School Buildings of Cyprus,” Proceedings of 15WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhorn-Kluttig H, Erhorn H, Kempe S, Höfle C, Görres J, Thomsen KE (2016), “EU Project “School of the Future”— Refurbishment of School Buildings Toward Zero Emission with High-Performance Indoor Environment,” ASHRAE Transactions, 122: Part 1.

  • Grant DN, Bommer JJ, Pinho R, Calvi GM, Goretti A and Meroni F (2007), “A Prioritization Scheme for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2): 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López OA, Hernández JJ, Del Re G, Puig J and Espinosa L (2007), “Reducing Seismic Risk of School Buildings in Venezuela,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(4): 771–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luccio FD, Fukuyama E, Pino NA (2005), “The 2002 Molise Earthquake Sequence: What can We Learn About the Tectonics of Southern Italy?” Tectonophysics, 405: 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei J and Bazzurro P (2004), “The 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, 20(S1): S1–S22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mora MG, Valcárcel JA, Cardona OD, Pujades LG, Barbat AH and Bernala GA (2015), “Prioritizing Interventions to Reduce Seismic Vulnerability in School Facilities in Colombia,” Earthquake Spectra, 31(4): 2535–2552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrtle RC, Masri SF, Nigbor RL and Caffreya JP (2005), “Classification and Prioritization of Essential Systems in Hospitals under Extreme Events,” Earthquake Spectra, 21(3): 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okumura H, Niino E, Takada S, Nakano Y, Ohta T and Okada T (2000), “Seismic Retrofit of RC School Buildings Using Post-Installed Walls With Openings,” Proceedings of 12WCEE, Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha HD, Pribadi KS, Kusumastuti D, Lim E (2008), Manual on “Retrofitting of Existing Vulnerable School Buildings–Assessment to Retrofitting” Part I, Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha HD, Pribadi KS, Kusumastuti D, Lim E (2009), Manual on “Retrofitting of Existing Vulnerable School Buildings–Assessment to Retrofitting” Part II, Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorace S and Terenzi G (2012), “Dissipative Bracing-Based Seismic Retrofit of R/C School Buildings,” The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 6: 334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syrmakezis CA, Mavrouli OA and Antonopoulos AK (2006), “Rehabilitation of Hospital Buildings Using Passive Control Systems,” Smart Structures and Systems, 2(4): 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesfamariam S and Wang Y (2012), “Risk-Based Seismic Retrofit Prioritization of Reinforced Concrete Civic Infrastructure: Case Study for State of Oregon Schools and Emergency Facilities,” Natural Hazards Review, 13(3): 188–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura CE, Finn WDL, Bebamzadeh A, Pina F and Taylor GW (2012), “Seismic Retrofit of School Buildings in British Columbia,” Proceedings of 15WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald D, Lin KW, Porter K, Turnerc L (2008), “ShakeCast: Automating and Improving the Use of ShakeMap for Post-Earthquake Decision-Making and Response,” Earthquake Spectra, 24(2): 533–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Casciati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casciati, F., Casciati, S. Amelioration and retrofitting of educational buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 17, 47–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0424-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0424-2

Keywords

Navigation