Abstract
Following a seismic event that occurred years ago in Central Italy, the public opinion was growing and growing a concern on the adequacy of educational buildings all across Italy. This activated several political decisions and a consequent technical effort is in progress. Technically speaking one has to manage the classical problem of retrofitting existing buildings. However, the legal environment goes across national codes, targeted guidelines and the professional need of achieving pragmatic solutions based on ethical and social acceptation schemes.This paper introduces the topic in its worldwide exception and focuses then on some operative aspects in the Italian situation. It outlines the consolidated steps along this technical process and emphasizes the weak aspects one meets when going across the designers’ reports.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Casciati F and Faravelli L (1991), Fragility Analysis of Complex Structural Systems, Research Studies Press, Taunton, UK.
Chrysostomou CZ, Kyriakides N, Kappos AJ, Georgiou E, Vasiliou O and Milis M (2012), “Seismic Retrofitting of School Buildings of Cyprus,” Proceedings of 15WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Erhorn-Kluttig H, Erhorn H, Kempe S, Höfle C, Görres J, Thomsen KE (2016), “EU Project “School of the Future”— Refurbishment of School Buildings Toward Zero Emission with High-Performance Indoor Environment,” ASHRAE Transactions, 122: Part 1.
Grant DN, Bommer JJ, Pinho R, Calvi GM, Goretti A and Meroni F (2007), “A Prioritization Scheme for Seismic Intervention in School Buildings in Italy,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(2): 291–314.
López OA, Hernández JJ, Del Re G, Puig J and Espinosa L (2007), “Reducing Seismic Risk of School Buildings in Venezuela,” Earthquake Spectra, 23(4): 771–790.
Luccio FD, Fukuyama E, Pino NA (2005), “The 2002 Molise Earthquake Sequence: What can We Learn About the Tectonics of Southern Italy?” Tectonophysics, 405: 141–154.
Maffei J and Bazzurro P (2004), “The 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake,” Earthquake Spectra, 20(S1): S1–S22.
Mora MG, Valcárcel JA, Cardona OD, Pujades LG, Barbat AH and Bernala GA (2015), “Prioritizing Interventions to Reduce Seismic Vulnerability in School Facilities in Colombia,” Earthquake Spectra, 31(4): 2535–2552.
Myrtle RC, Masri SF, Nigbor RL and Caffreya JP (2005), “Classification and Prioritization of Essential Systems in Hospitals under Extreme Events,” Earthquake Spectra, 21(3): 779–802.
Okumura H, Niino E, Takada S, Nakano Y, Ohta T and Okada T (2000), “Seismic Retrofit of RC School Buildings Using Post-Installed Walls With Openings,” Proceedings of 12WCEE, Auckland, New Zealand.
Shrestha HD, Pribadi KS, Kusumastuti D, Lim E (2008), Manual on “Retrofitting of Existing Vulnerable School Buildings–Assessment to Retrofitting” Part I, Save the Children.
Shrestha HD, Pribadi KS, Kusumastuti D, Lim E (2009), Manual on “Retrofitting of Existing Vulnerable School Buildings–Assessment to Retrofitting” Part II, Save the Children.
Sorace S and Terenzi G (2012), “Dissipative Bracing-Based Seismic Retrofit of R/C School Buildings,” The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 6: 334–345.
Syrmakezis CA, Mavrouli OA and Antonopoulos AK (2006), “Rehabilitation of Hospital Buildings Using Passive Control Systems,” Smart Structures and Systems, 2(4): 305–312.
Tesfamariam S and Wang Y (2012), “Risk-Based Seismic Retrofit Prioritization of Reinforced Concrete Civic Infrastructure: Case Study for State of Oregon Schools and Emergency Facilities,” Natural Hazards Review, 13(3): 188–195.
Ventura CE, Finn WDL, Bebamzadeh A, Pina F and Taylor GW (2012), “Seismic Retrofit of School Buildings in British Columbia,” Proceedings of 15WCEE, Lisbon, Portugal.
Wald D, Lin KW, Porter K, Turnerc L (2008), “ShakeCast: Automating and Improving the Use of ShakeMap for Post-Earthquake Decision-Making and Response,” Earthquake Spectra, 24(2): 533–553.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casciati, F., Casciati, S. Amelioration and retrofitting of educational buildings. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 17, 47–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0424-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0424-2