Abstract
Cushion is a layer of granular materials between the raft and the ground. The shear behavior of the interface between the cushion and the raft may influence the seismic performance of the superstructure. In order to quantify such influences, horizontal shear tests on the interfaces between different cushion materials and concrete raft under monotonic and cyclic loading were carried out. The vertical pressure Pv, material type and cushion thickness hc were taken as variables. Conclusions include: 1) under monotonic loading, Pv is the most significant factor; the shear resistance Phmax increases as Pv increases, but the normalized factor of resistance μn has an opposite tendency; 2) for the materials used in this study, μn varies from 0.40 to 0.70, the interface friction angle δs varies from 20° to 35°, while umax varies from 3 mm to 15 mm; 3) under cyclic loading, the interface behavior can be abstracted as a “three-segment” back-bone curve, the main parameters include μn, the displacement u1 and stiffness K1 of the elastic stage, the displacement u2 and stiffness K2 of the plastic stage; 4) by observation and statistical analysis, the significance of different factors, together with values of K1, K2 and μn have been obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Desai C and Nagaraj B (1988), “Modeling for Cyclic Normal and Shear Behavior of Interfaces,” J. Eng. Mech., 114(7): 1198–1217, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1988).
Desai C, Drumm E, and Zaman M (1985), “Cyclic Testing and Modeling of Interfaces,” J. Geotech. Eng., 111(6): 793–815, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985).
Desai C, Pradhan S, and Cohen D (2005), “Cyclic Testing and Constitutive Modeling of Saturated Sand-Concrete Interfaces Using the Disturbed State Concept,” Int. J. Geomech., 5(4): 286–294, http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005).
Fakharian K (1996), “Three-Dimensional Monotonic and Cyclic Behaviour of Sand-Steel Interfaces: Testing and Modelling,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa.
Frost JD, Lee SW, Cargill PE (1999), “The Evolution of Sand Structure Adjacent to Geomembranes,” presented at the Geosynthetics Conference 1999, Boston, Massachusetts, Industrial Fabrics Association International.
Frost J, De Jong J, and Recalde M (2002), “Shear Failure Behavior of Granular–Continuum Interfaces,” Eng. Fracture Mech., 69(17): 2029–2048, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00075-9.
Frost J, Hebeler G, Evans T, and DeJong J (2004), “Interface Behavior of Granular Soils,” Proc., Ninth Biennial Conf. on Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, March 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers, League City, Houston, Texas, 65–72, http://dx.doi. org/10.1061/40722(153)10.
Gao JH, Yu HX, and Zhao WB (2000), “Characteristics Study of Interface Between Soil and Concrete by Using Large Size Single Shear Apparatus and Numerical Analysis,” China Civil Eng. J., 33(4): 42–46. (in Chinese)
GB 50152-2012 (2012), Standard Methods for Testing of Concrete Structures, MOHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China) and AQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China), Beijing, China. (in Chinese)
Hu LM and Pu JL (2001), “Experimental Study on Mechanical Characteristics of Soil-Structure Interface,” Chinese J. of Geotechnical Eng., 23(4): 431–435. (in Chinese)
Hu L and Pu J (2004), “Testing and Modeling of Soil-Structure Interface,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130(8): 851–860.
Lashkari A (2013), “Prediction of the Shaft Resistance of Nondisplacement Piles in Sand,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 37(8): 904–931.
Liu HB and Ling HI (2008), “Constitutive Description of Interface Behavior Including Cyclic Loading and Particle Breakage within the Framework of Critical State Soil Mechanics,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 32(12): 1495–1514, 10.1002/nag.682.
Liu HB, Song EX and Ling HI (2006), “Constitutive Modeling of Soil-Structure Interface through the Concept of Critical State Soil Mechanics,” Mech. Research Communications, 33(4): 515–531, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2006.01.002.
Liu J, Zou D and Kong X (2014), “A Three-Dimensional State-Dependent Model of Soil-structure Interface for Monotonic and Cyclic Loadings,” Computers and Geotechnics, 61: 166–177.
Lu TH, Wang W and Wang XN (2006), “Experimental Study on Soil-Structure Contact Surface Behavior by Improved Direct Shear Test,” J. Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 22(1): 82–85. (in Chinese)
Mortara G, Boulon M and Ghionna VN (2002), “A 2-D Constitutive Model for Cyclic Interface Behaviour,” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 26(11): 1071–1096.
Mortara G, Mangiola A and Ghionna VN (2007), “Cyclic Shear Stress Degradation and Post-Cyclic Behaviour from Sand–Steel Interface Direct Shear Tests,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44(7): 739–752.
Porcino D, Fioravante V, Ghionna VN and Sergio P (2003), “Interface Behavior of Sands from Constant Normal Stiffness Direct Shear Tests,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 26(3): 289–301, https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11308J.
Qian JH (2002), “The Investigation of Resisting Slip Text between the Concrete Slab and the Ground Soil,” J. Anhui Technical College of Water Resources and Hydroelectric Power, 2(1): 20–23. (in Chinese)
Saberi M, Annan CD, Konrad JM and Lashkari K (2016), “A Critical State Two-Surface Plasticity Model for Gravelly Soil-Structure Interfaces under Monotonic and Cyclic loading,” Computers and Geotechnics, 80: 71–82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.011.
Saberi M, Annan CD and Konrad JM (2017), “Constitutive Modeling of Gravelly Soil–Structure Interface Considering Particle Breakage,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 143(8): 04017044 (pp.14).
Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Wu Y (2005), Introduction to Orthogonal Arrays, Taguchi’s Quality Engineering Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, 741–753.
Tejchman J and Wu W (1995), “Experimental and Numerical Study of Sand-Steel interfaces,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 19(8): 513–536, 10.1002/nag.1610190803.
Uesugi M and Kishida H (1986a), “Influential Factors of Friction between Steel and Dry Sands,” Soils and Foundations, 26(2): 33–46, http://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26. 2_33.
Uesugi M and Kishida H (1986b), “Frictional Resistance at Yield between Dry Sand and Mild Steel,” Soils and Foundations, 26(4): 139–149, http://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.4_139.
Wong IH, Chang MF, Cao XD (2000), “Raft Foundations with Disconnected Settlement Reducing Piles,” In: Hemsley JA, Design applications of raft foundations, Thomas Telford Ltd., London, 469–486.
Wu SY, Song EX, Liu HB and Wang ZG (2007), “Shaking Table Test Study on Aseismic Behavior of Rigid Pile Composite Foundation,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, 28(1): 77–82. (in Chinese)
Yang Q, and Xue YS (1999), “Indoor Experimental Research of the Anti-slip between Concrete Mat Slab and Crushed Stone Cushion,” Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 27(6): 5–8. (in Chinese)
Zhang G and Zhang JM (2004a), “Experimental Study on Monotonic Behavior of Interface between Soil and Structure,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 26(1): 21–25 (in Chinese).
Zhang G and Zhang JM (2004b), “Experimental Study on Cyclic Behavior of Interface between soil and Structure,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 26(2): 254–258. (in Chinese).
Zhang G and Zhang JM (2006), “Monotonic and Cyclic Tests of Interface between Structure and Gravelly Soil,” Soils and Foundations, 46(4): 505–518.
Zhao SW, Dou YM, Guo R and Cai XY (2005), “An Experimental Study of Isolating Properties of Sand Cushion under the Foundation by Shaking Table,” Journal of Hebei University of Technology, 34(3): 92–97. (in Chinese)
Zhou JL (2006), “The Anti-Slip Properties between Cast-in-Place Concrete Slab and the Ground Soil (I),” Jiangsu Water Resources, 10(12): 9–11. (in Chinese)
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to acknowledge the support received from the State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science at South China University of Technology (Project No. 2011ZA05). The first author would like to acknowledge FRQNT (Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Nature et Technologies) for its support by Québec-China postdoctoral merit scholarship program for foreign students.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by: the State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science at South China University of Technology under Grant No. 2011ZA05, and Québec-China postdoctoral merit scholarship program for foreign students
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Han, X., Galal, K. et al. Experimental study on the shear behavior of the interface between cushion materials and the concrete raft. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 17, 165–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0432-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-018-0432-2